roger1440
I do stuff
Are you saying the instinct to survive does not come from God?That is Tribal survival instinct, - not something from a God.
*
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you saying the instinct to survive does not come from God?That is Tribal survival instinct, - not something from a God.
*
Indeed, if you take any lineage, we see that there exists only one life that is passed on from generation to generation, capable of embodying multiple beings at once. If evolution is true, and it very well may be, and if it is true as many evolution scientists agree, that all life came from a first living being, whatever that may have been, then indeed there is but one life, and that every living thing embodies that life, or visa-versa, however it may be. It seems most reasonable to assume that life itself likely preexisted that first life form or life forms, whichever it may be.Perpetual motion is something that is powered by itself. It does not require something outside of itself to move. Life is powered by its own instinctive need to survive. There is a force behind every living creature to continue its existence. This continuation does not stop with the individual. We have the instinctive will to continue our species by procreation. Our offspring is literally an extension of ourselves. All our offspring has half our DNA. We are driven to protect our offspring because they are an extension of ourselves. This instinctive drive to protect does not end with our offspring. From there it goes to our extended family, then our tribe or community and so on. There is a sort of connectivity between ALL people.
Interestingly, I found his point to be quite clear. Life is something that a living body possesses. It is something which exists. It is passed on from generation to generation. It is something separate from a body, as a body can exist which does not contain it. Therefore it is something which is continually passed on, and is therefore something which is in motion. And so long as something does or does not occur to prevent that life force from propagating, it is indeed has perpetual motion.Which is completely unrelated to perpetual motion.
Perpetual motion is also something that does not exist, so i can not imagine what point it is you are trying to make.
Then I would stop posting if I were you. At present you are doing a fantastic job of making believers look like morons.
The only alternate explanation for your behaviour is that you are an anti-theist pretending to be a believer in order to demean, discredit and diminish them. If that is the case, it is a despicable tactic.
Interestingly, I found his point to be quite clear. Life is something that a living body possesses. It is something which exists. It is passed on from generation to generation. It is something separate from a body, as a body can exist which does not contain it. Therefore it is something which is continually passed on, and is therefore something which is in motion. And so long as something does or does not occur to prevent that life force from propagating, it is indeed has perpetual motion.
An object in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by another force.
Are you saying the instinct to survive does not come from God?
How so? Acting like a fool deliberately is hardly productive. It also makes other believers look bad.Bunyip you are missing the point!
I'd happily agree.Are you saying the instinct to survive does not come from God?
Let me turn it around. What does come from God?
How so? Acting like a fool deliberately is hardly productive. It also makes other believers look bad.
No, you got that wrong. The bible gives followers clear instructions on how to behave towards unbelievers when discussing their faith. And no, it doesn't say that you get to cheat, be a 'rogue' etc.The clue is in the "rogue". The challenge is in the "rogue". If you remove the "rogue", then you remove the challenge. It is a game. "It also makes other believers look bad." Bunyip, Thief's approach also gives other believers the opportunity to look good. Defending one's beliefs in an intellectual sense is an artform and a game. Thief and others like him create the game. "Worry not what you will say, for the Holy Spirit will tell you what to say " And the Holy Spirit is the master of the game. Opportunity begets interesting opportunities and when the Holy Spirit is envolved you get to cheat because you have answers that they do not have and you can make other believers look good.
According to the book of Genesis, the very first thing God said to man was make babies.
Every religion needs a new generation of adherents to keep the ball rolling.
Procreation will happen....no matter whose ball is in play.
True, it's a biological imperative but there's a difference between procreation and being encouraged to procreate as much as you can, whether you can afford to take care of the kids or not, because "God will provide".
No, you got that wrong. The bible gives followers clear instructions on how to behave towards unbelievers when discussing their faith. And no, it doesn't say that you get to cheat, be a 'rogue' etc.
I'm an atheist mate, I'm just pointing out that scrioture specifically instructs followers to be polite and share their beliefs with grace and humility - as opposed to lying , playing the fool and acting like a 'rogue' which you may like to pretend is ok but is clearly against scripture.Well I guess that that srteightens me out , thank you sir! And just for the record there was nobody more rogue that Lord Jesus in His day. And if God Himself is actually telling you what to say, then it is cheating. At least relative to normal people attempting to prove a point. And nobody completely follows the words of Lord Jesus even though they claim to be His followers, not even you.