Do stop blathering. It's clear that you know next to nothing about the formation of the canon and I said nothing of Hebrew whatsoever. I'm Christian, not Jewish. Nor did I speak of the writing of the books but the collection of them - that's what the formation of the canon means.
The compilation of the canon did not come from a group of monks at all. The Old Testament canon is inherited from the Septuagint, which was compiled by Jews at Alexandria between about 300 and 100 BC. The New Testament canon was likewise compiled by a long process involving many individuals and councils between the 2nd and 5th centuries AD. Most of the canon is already agreed on very early, but the first complete list isn't seen in the opinions of any Father or council until much, much later. Unless you are going to posit a group of monks who lived for several hundred years and could simultaneously be in more than one place, then your conspiracy theory is completely unworkable.
And as for King James (and his version has no weight whatsoever with me), he didn't translate anything - not one word. His name is on the translation because he patronised it, not because he created it. You really should learn to shut your mouth if you aren't sure of your facts. This sort of historical naivetee passed off as knowledge, especially combined with your pontificating attitude, simply makes you look foolish.
James