Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No because Prophets come with revelation and accompanying signs to show their truthfulness. I'm not aware of any signs produced by Baha'ullah and secondly, Muhammad pbuh proved his truthfulness, was sent with accompanying signs, and we are told, he was the Final Prophet.It doesn't really matter because different groups have different criteria. Do you consider Baha'ullah to be a prophet?
Moses is considered a reliable prophet because the entire nation heard G-d speak to Moses at Mt. Sinai. Unless the entire nation experiences another mass revelation between G-d and another prophet, any other prophet has to rely on Moses. By that I mean, anyone coming with any sort of message from G-d has to first prove that he can indeed tell the future by describing future events a number of times, that end up being exactly as described (obviously that means vague descriptions won't cut it). After that, he's believed so long as his prophecy or message doesn't contradict or revoke anything that Moses said. He also needs to have some personal qualities befitting a man of G-d.I'm wondering how people try to distinguish between "true" prophets and "false" prophets. If someone walks down the street claiming to be a prophet for a religion (admittedly unlikely) you have to figure out whether you can take them at their word or whether you just move on trying to avoid making eye contact with the crazy person.
I think probably the best way to tell if someone were a false prophet is if they offer salvation. In reality, no-one can save us. There is no quick fix or easy solution to the problems of learning how to live our own lives. It is up to us to "save ourselves" by giving our lives meaning and purpose. The best we can get is to find spiritual and religious knowledge, be open to it and for someone to help us on our own journey. The higher level of consciousness associated with religious being is ultimately part of our own anatomy. It is part of our brain or mind (or soul if you wish). A false prophet can take away our ability to "see" and to "hear" from us by telling us to look for answers outside of ourselves in some external authority. The "true" prophet is someone who can help us regain our sight and hearing and learn to use our own conscience for the purpose of self-discover and self-creation.
Do you think this is a reasonable view? Or is there something missing?
This is just your opinion. List the Prophets that came after Moses pbuh who you accept and list their pinpoint numerous predictions of future events, nothing vague of course.Moses is considered a reliable prophet because the entire nation heard G-d speak to Moses at Mt. Sinai. Unless the entire nation experiences another mass revelation between G-d and another prophet, any other prophet has to rely on Moses. By that I mean, anyone coming with any sort of message from G-d has to first prove that he can indeed tell the future by describing future events a number of times, that end up being exactly as described (obviously that means vague descriptions won't cut it). After that, he's believed so long as his prophecy or message doesn't contradict or revoke anything that Moses said. He also needs to have some personal qualities befitting a man of G-d.
If by my opinion you mean the opinion of Jewish source texts, than yes, it is.This is just your opinion.
Why would we keep their tests for posterity?List the Prophets that came after Moses pbuh who you accept and list their pinpoint numerous predictions of future events, nothing vague of course.
Mt. Sinai is very important as an historical site. It has no inherent importance, it has no bearing on any Jewish Law. We don't need to know where it is.btw Mt. Sinai is a very important site to the Israelites, yet no Jew knows where it is today.
This is just your opinion. List the Prophets that came after Moses pbuh who you accept and list their pinpoint numerous predictions of future events, nothing vague of course.
btw Mt. Sinai is a very important site to the Israelites, yet no Jew knows where it is today.
Post the Torah verses confirming this.If by my opinion you mean the opinion of Jewish source texts, than yes, it is.
No need, they were Prophets who preached worship and submission to the will of the One GOD. That is the test and they are sent with signs showing they were indeed from God.Why would we keep their tests for posterity?
That's fine. It's in Saudi Arabia if you ever wondered.Mt. Sinai is very important as an historical site. It has no inherent importance, it has no bearing on any Jewish Law. We don't need to know where it is.
King Solomon pbuh honoured Moses pbuh by marking the spot of the crossing with a Stone Pillar. He placed two of them on each beach, one on the Egyptian side and the other in Saudi Arabia. The description of Mount Sinai given in the Torah doesn't match with what we find in Egypt, but fits perfectly when you look in S.Arabia.Sinai is in the Levant not in some desert wasteland
Deut. 18:21-22Post the Torah verses confirming this.
That's not a test. Anyone can walk around preaching worship and submission to G-d. That doesn't mean he's also getting messages from G-d.No need, they were Prophets who preached worship and submission to the will of the One GOD. That is the test and they are sent with signs showing they were indeed from God.
I'm aware that that's one of the places historians believe it to be. I don't see how it really makes a difference where it is though.That's fine. It's in Saudi Arabia if you ever wondered.
I'm wondering how people try to distinguish between "true" prophets and "false" prophets. If someone walks down the street claiming to be a prophet for a religion (admittedly unlikely) you have to figure out whether you can take them at their word or whether you just move on trying to avoid making eye contact with the crazy person.
I think probably the best way to tell if someone were a false prophet is if they offer salvation. In reality, no-one can save us. There is no quick fix or easy solution to the problems of learning how to live our own lives. It is up to us to "save ourselves" by giving our lives meaning and purpose. The best we can get is to find spiritual and religious knowledge, be open to it and for someone to help us on our own journey. The higher level of consciousness associated with religious being is ultimately part of our own anatomy. It is part of our brain or mind (or soul if you wish). A false prophet can take away our ability to "see" and to "hear" from us by telling us to look for answers outside of ourselves in some external authority. The "true" prophet is someone who can help us regain our sight and hearing and learn to use our own conscience for the purpose of self-discover and self-creation.
Do you think this is a reasonable view? Or is there something missing?
Deut. 18:21-22
Look again, I said they would come with signs, ie predictions, miracles etcThat's not a test. Anyone can walk around preaching worship and submission to G-d. That doesn't mean he's also getting messages from G-d.
It doesn't, it just shows Saudi Arabia is central to God's plan. First House of GOD, Final Messenger from there etcI'm aware that that's one of the places historians believe it to be. I don't see how it really makes a difference where it is though.
41:37 (Asad) Now among His signs are the night and the day, as well as the sun and the MOON: [hence,] adore not the sun or the MOON, but prostrate yourselves in adoration before God, who has created them - if it is Him whom you [really] worship. [33]No because Prophets come with revelation and accompanying signs to show their truthfulness. I'm not aware of any signs produced by Baha'ullah and secondly, Muhammad pbuh proved his truthfulness, was sent with accompanying signs, and we are told, he was the Final Prophet.
btw talking of signs, you will perhaps recall me asking you about the Apollo 11 mission.
I asked when the shuttle left the moon's surface and with how much Moon rock, and you responded, "July 29, 1969 at 1:57PM." "Not a lot. 22 kilograms."
Was Muhammad the final prophet?
I got sidetracked and forgot to get back to you. You were not far off:
LM Departed Moon: July 21, 1969
17:54:01 UT (1:54:01 p.m. EDT)
Moon Rocks Returned: 21.7 kilograms
Apollo 11 | National Air and Space Museum
From the above we note 21/7/1969 carrying 21.7kg and left at 54:01 (The hour isn't important as it would have been different depending on where one lived on Earth at the time).
Quran Search - IslamiCity
Can you indulge me and do a word search, 'Moon' on that site and notice it will return results showing that word occurs in 27 verses, one of the verses has it mentioned twice, so 28 results in all.
Now looking down the list, count the word Moon until you reach the 20th time it's mentioned and stop.
Let me know when you've done that, if you choose to of course! (Gives you a gentle nudge)
41:37 (Asad) Now among His signs are the night and the day, as well as the sun and the MOON: [hence,] adore not the sun or the MOON, but prostrate yourselves in adoration before God, who has created them - if it is Him whom you [really] worship. [33]
the 2nd use of Moon is the 20th time cited in the list. What of it?
Oh, good grief. LOL.Now go back and notice the 21st, (day the shuttle left) mention is found in Qur'an 54:1 << The 54th Chapter just happens to be called Moon. Remember it left 54 min and 1 sec
After 54:1 the word Moon is mentioned another 7 times (July)
The number of verses after 54:1 are til the end of the Qur'an are 1389 verses, which converted to the Gregorian Calendar = yep, 1969 <<< The year of the Apollo 11 Mission.
King Solomon pbuh honoured Moses pbuh by marking the spot of the crossing with a Stone Pillar. He placed two of them on each beach, one on the Egyptian side and the other in Saudi Arabia. The description of Mount Sinai given in the Torah doesn't match with what we find in Egypt, but fits perfectly when you look in S.Arabia.
I'm not sure you're following. In order for a person to be accepted as a prophet, they first must pass the test of describing future events exactly. Then they can be believed as a prophet. That's the order.Deuteronomy 18:21-22
21 And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the Lord has not spoken?’— 22 when a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the Lord has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.
Muhammad pbuh passed:
You did say that. But look again. You said the test is that they preach worship and submission. As a side note you pointed out that they also bring signs.Look again, I said they would come with signs, ie predictions, miracles etc
I'm not sure that because one event took place at Mt Sinai that it automatically becomes central to G-d's plan. I'd guess that that area would feature a bit more prominently in Jewish sources were that the case.It doesn't, it just shows Saudi Arabia is central to God's plan. First House of GOD, Final Messenger from there etc
I'm wondering how people try to distinguish between "true" prophets and "false" prophets. If someone walks down the street claiming to be a prophet for a religion (admittedly unlikely) you have to figure out whether you can take them at their word or whether you just move on trying to avoid making eye contact with the crazy person.
I think probably the best way to tell if someone were a false prophet is if they offer salvation. In reality, no-one can save us. There is no quick fix or easy solution to the problems of learning how to live our own lives. It is up to us to "save ourselves" by giving our lives meaning and purpose. The best we can get is to find spiritual and religious knowledge, be open to it and for someone to help us on our own journey. The higher level of consciousness associated with religious being is ultimately part of our own anatomy. It is part of our brain or mind (or soul if you wish). A false prophet can take away our ability to "see" and to "hear" from us by telling us to look for answers outside of ourselves in some external authority. The "true" prophet is someone who can help us regain our sight and hearing and learn to use our own conscience for the purpose of self-discover and self-creation.
Do you think this is a reasonable view? Or is there something missing?