waitasec
Veteran Member
Mine. That experience includes my experience of others.
what, how can you experience others experiences?
that's being presumptuous... wouldn't you say?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mine. That experience includes my experience of others.
no it seemed obvious, we were talking about physically dying when you stop breathing and your heart stops pumping...
what, how can you experience others experiences?
that's being presumptuous... wouldn't you say?
You were. I wasn't.
one can live their life, but die without having lived at all.
why would you say this?
I said my experience of others, not that I know their experiences.
in my experience when we see someone who we think has a 'holier than thou' attitude, there is not something wrong with the person speaking, but ourselves. Most likely, there is something we do not wish to admit to ourselves about ourselves.
But, this may not be the case here.
I am just speaking from experience. Take it or leave it.
you're moving goal posts captain...
you cannot experience what you presume someone is going through.
and it's not what you said...you said in my experience...here, let me remind you.
maybe this is something you do not wish to admit to yourself...
you're pussyfooting around the real issue; faith in god is actually faith in yourself.
That's just your own opinion brother! Do you have a problem if God demands fear?
All you have done is illustrate that man wrote words to reflect their personal fear of the unknown."Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling" -Phil.2:12
See that? Its not my own opinion its God's word...
Because a person can be death and alive at the same time. Not possible with physical death, but with what I'm talking about, it is.
Originally Posted by waitasec
if you love someone would you set up a condition where they would be tormented as retaliation for lack of faith in you?
Originally Posted by strikeviperMKII
Without death, we cannot know life. That being said, one can live their life, but die without having lived at all.
If I came across that way, it was not my intention. in my experience, when we see someone who we think has a 'holier than thou' attitude, there is not something wrong with the person speaking, but ourselves. Most likely, there is something we do not wish to admit to ourselves about ourselves.
But, this may not be the case here. I am just speaking from experience. Take it or leave it.
ok. so what does this have to do with the everlasting life in john 3:16?
everlasting life is the consequence of said condition...belief, right?
you changed the subject...
how does faith/belief in jesus, in the context of john 3:16 explain that gods love is unconditional when he places conditions?
gods love is conditional because there are conditions, simple.
why would a loving parent place a condition to where separation and torment would be a consequence for not fulfilling the condition?
i claimed that gods love was conditional. you disagreed, because in order for his creation to have everlasting life, the condition was to believe which has nothing to do with unconditional love. so one more time.
if you love someone would you set up a condition where they would be tormented as retaliation for lack of faith in you? we are talking about john 3:16...why would jesus want everlasting separation from his creation because they second guess him?
if you are not going to answer the question, don't bother.
there's really no point in changing the subject unless the point is you can't
Everlasting life is the same as belief, not a condition of it. You receive it in the same sense that you receive a gift from yourself to yourself.
It is a consequence of not choosing life. When the torment is a consequence of a choice that we made, how is that a condition? We chose something different, and got what that choice led to. God didn't cause that.
And as I said, the passage says 'For God so loved the world...' meaning love already existed. It wasn't 'For God wanted to love the world' or 'For God wanted to see who would believe in him so he could then love them'.
See what I'm saying?
I have answered this already, but I will attempt to do so again.
A simple answer is Jesus didn't want it. God doesn't want it. He says 'I give you life and death, the blessing and the affliction, so that you may choose life.' That should answer your first question.
If you believe that life can come without death, pleasure without pain, happiness without sadness, then you are living in a fantasy world. You cannot have one side of the coin without the other.
There are some species of jellyfish which do not naturally die, ever. That sounds like having one side without the other.You cannot have one side of the coin without the other.
well you haven't been reading my replies, have you?
i never implied this. it's just another ad hominem of yours
nice try, but i won't fall for it this time captain.
"whoever believes in him " is the condition for ever lasting life.
god created the consequence of everlasting through the condition
when i read that, it's not that god loved us 1st but how much based on the condition of belief.
some have accepted the realities of life and death
others have not...
There are some species of jellyfish which do not naturally die, ever. That sounds like having one side without the other.
You trying to say that death is an intrinsic part of life. Aren't you?I don't think you've understood the point.
And your idea of believe is what?
I believe I said this already.
19 This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live
Deuteronomy 30:19
A choice. Not an ultimatum. To live is not simply to exist. To live is to be. To be is to choose.
my idea of "believe" is the condition
it's pretty clear, i don't know why your avoiding the obviousness of it.
16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of Gods one and only Son.
i thought we were talking about john 3?
when god says choose life, he's referring to the old covenant, so really this has nothing to do with the verse about the new covenant, jesus.
well i am alive, i exist. otherwise what you are implying that life is just an illusion for those who do not believe... that comes off as, well how do i put this nicely, you're giving yourself an unmerited, unjustified degree of importance.
what is the compelling action god is presenting, everlasting life or to be condemned based on if you believe or not?
consider this,
unconditional love does not place a condition of it being reciprocated.
faith is an expression of love. i have faith in my child, in hopes that he will make the right choices because i love him unconditionally. i will not turn away if he second guess my point of view on any given issue.
sure god may have loved us first, however, in order for us to experience his expression of his love, everlasting life, one needs to have faith in it.
a condition...
btw,
where in the bible does t say god loves unconditionally?
sure it says that god loves us, but under what conditions...?
You didn't answer my question. I didn't ask if you think 'believe' was the condition, I asked what you think believe meant.
The choice remains. The options have taken different form, but the choice remains.
Existence is a property. Living is a choice. Believing is the distinction.
And you believe God does?
In order to experience something we must experience it. We don't have to have faith that the something we are experiencing is the thing we are experiencing.
We have to recognize it for what it is, however.
You need a 2000 year old book to tell you these things? Is God the bible, or is God, God?