The people who wrote the NT were Hellenist living in the Diaspora far removed from his life and culture.
I knew you did not have a clue who his people were..
The same people calling jesus son of god, a week before were calling the emperor son of god.
Now its also obvious you don't have a clue what the context to son of god even is. The OT references speak of never refer to physical descent from God.
So please study up and learn about things before you decide to debate them. DIFFERENT OT text has different context when using this term.
the
Biblical judges are called gods and the sons of God
You don't want to do this, Outhouse. This isn't your concern, as you've expressed. But, I'll give you the simple truth.
Jesus answered them, `Is it not having been written in your law: I said, ye are gods? If them he did call gods unto whom the word of God came, of him whom the Father did sanctify, and send to the world, do ye say -- Thou speakest evil, because I said, Son of God I am?
Psalm 82
God hath stood in the company of God, In the midst God doth judge. Till when do ye judge perversely? And the face of the wicked lift up? Selah. Judge ye the weak and fatherless. The afflicted and the poor declare righteous. Let the weak and needy escape; from the hand of the wicked deliver them. They knew not, nor do they understand, In darkness they walk habitually. Moved are all the foundations of earth. I -- I have said, `Gods ye [are], And sons of the Most High -- all of you. But as man ye die, and as one of the heads ye fall. Rise, O God, judge the earth, for Thou hast inheritance among all the nations!
Simple truth: Jesus rightly discerned that these "sons of the Most High" were not only judges in Israel before his time; they include those among all nations, in all times.
Judgement on these things determine "sons of the Most High:
1) Judge ye the weak and fatherless.
2) The afflicted and the poor declare righteous.
3) Let the weak and needy escape; from the hand of the wicked deliver them.
You'd have to intentionally ignore the simple truth here, that this is applicable to every single person on Earth. Jesus didn't simply call himself "a son of the Most High". He acknowledges the leadership at that time, while extending the letter to those able to perform the 3 functions prescribed. The context doesn't support your assertion that these Judges whom Moses appointed, before they had even set foot into Israel, or those that died in Joshua's generation, could possibly judge the Earth up until Jesus' point, or this point.
You can think you know what you're talking about here, in context, but you really don't. The simple truth says you are wrong. The author specifically cites the "Son of God" concept that came much earlier than that of the Romans'. Period.