sooda
Veteran Member
The statement that it originated with a single historic event is
as evidence-free as the story itself.
Who has claimed it was a single, historic event?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The statement that it originated with a single historic event is
as evidence-free as the story itself.
No. He kept the hatchet so that he would perpetually have an ax to grind. At least that is the story I just came up with. If I repeat it, how long until it becomes the truth for some readers?If he had lied then that would be lost to history,
along with his hatchet.
On further reading, it seems those rivers were navigated with a variety of fairly sizable craft, including sail boats. Some of these are still being used.Not sure. I do know that Babylonians also had sailboats 5,000 years ago.
https://www.brighthubengineering.com/marine-history/78133-the-sailboats-of-ancient-mesopotamia/
No. He kept the hatchet so that he would perpetually have an ax to grind. At least that is the story I just came up with. If I repeat it, how long until it becomes the truth for some readers?
On further reading, it seems those rivers were navigated with a variety of fairly sizable craft, including sail boats. Some of these are still being used.
"Traditional sailing craft still in use include muhaylahs and safīnahs that are 30 to 80 feet (9 to 24 metres) long, with a capacity of up to 50 tons".
Tigris-Euphrates river system - Economy
The idea that Noah would not have had access to some of the finer details of ship construction and that he received his blueprints through magic is even more silly now.
That does not figure. No creationist ever replaces the head.You know, the "this is his hatchet, handle replaced
6 times, and the head once"
There you go again, using facts. When will you ever learn. LOL!The Babylonians were farming and inventing stuff a thousand years before Adam and Eve.
Didn't he cut fence posts with that hatchet or was that the ghost of Lincoln?You know, the "this is his hatchet, handle replaced
6 times, and the head once"
I may be splitting hairs, but it was splitting rails that the ghost of Lincoln did.You know, the "this is his hatchet, handle replaced
6 times, and the head once"
There you go again, using facts. When will you ever learn. LOL!
Wow! I never thought about that. Cultural contamination and a penchant for incorporating the cultural tales of other lands into personal stories would account for much of the historicity that is claimed to be fact.Consider the time frame..
Aesop was a Greek storyteller born in approximately 620 BCE.
Tradition says he was born as a slave, but developed a real talent for fables that were used to teach truths in a simple, understandable way.
Wow! I never thought about that. Cultural contamination and a penchant for incorporating the cultural tales of other lands into personal stories would account for much of the historicity that is claimed to be fact.
The fact that ancient people were isolated from a grander understanding of the world often overshadows the fact that they still had a very rich culture and valuable wisdom. I think that the arrogance of knowledge and the demand that stories be seen as infallible overwhelm those facts from two different directions at times. It is good to discuss what those intelligent people could really do with the resources that were at their disposal.Exactly.. A fable is about animals.. but the purpose of the story telling is the same.
Wow! I never thought about that. Cultural contamination and a penchant for incorporating the cultural tales of other lands into personal stories would account for much of the historicity that is claimed to be fact.
It was a more innocent time of conflict, atrocities and human suffering.The grim spectre of cultural appropriation
The fact that ancient people were isolated from a grander understanding of the world often overshadows the fact that they still had a very rich culture and valuable wisdom. I think that the arrogance of knowledge and the demand that stories be seen as infallible overwhelm those facts from two different directions at times. It is good to discuss what those intelligent people could really do with the resources that were at their disposal.
I
I think they had intelligent people just like we do today. They just did not know as much. I think a lot of what you post expresses the fact that these were not stupid people and were actually very complex. Just ignorant of a good deal of information that we take for granted these days.I think they must have been very intelligent.
I think they had intelligent people just like we do today. They just did not know as much. I think a lot of what you post expresses the fact that these were not stupid people and were actually very complex. Just ignorant of a good deal of information that we take for granted these days.
I don't know where they went. Probably out looking for flash-frozen mammoth burgers.Someone go catch a floody