We're going in circles.How do you know your interpretation is correct, and everyone else, got it wrong?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We're going in circles.How do you know your interpretation is correct, and everyone else, got it wrong?
It's one of the meanings,
Ok, leave it. We can agree to disagreeWe're going in circles.
You repeat questions. We've been through this before. I'm not going through you ignoring all evidence again. I'm not pasting what @firedragon showed you nor going to talk about the other verse with this same word.If Khatam, could literally mean "final" as one of the meanings, the Arab scholars did not need to go the farther way, and interpret it metaphorically to mean final.
who had told you, it means final?
I quoted Arab scholarsz they say, it meant Signet Ring, or Seal. I don't know where you got that idea from.
That's a sure way to misguide Muslims.
There cant be a last prophet if a covenant exists for information to be conveyed without end.I don't see how it contradicts that verse.
The Quran endorses reason and endorses Isa/Yeshua, who endorsed Isaiah by quoting from his book.But you have to show something in Quran that contradicts it. Really, you can't be doing this quoting from the Bible when Bible has more then Twelve Successors to Musa (a), there is no way to confirm it all.
..but how does that apply to 'a seal' ?No, when God says "Be", then "it is"
Very easily
The guidance (law) hasn't changed much .. from Adam through to Muhammad.There cant be a last prophet if a covenant exists for information to be conveyed without end..
The thing is because God is hidden, fearing God is from love, because it accepts who God is while he is unseen. If we want to follow caprice and also don't want to worry about others going to hell, we simply deny God's wrathful side, since he is unseen and love is all that can see him now. We can easily just deny his existence or deny who he is. Most mankind does the latter, they choose who he is rather submitting to him.One doesn't need a god belief to want and to succeed at being a good person. Atheistic humanists are typically good people. Nor does he need to worship your god. While there are many fine, upstanding theistic humanists, I find Dharmics and pagans to be decent people as well.
On the other hand, if your religion teaches you bigotries or makes you think that it is OK to impose itself on the unwilling through the use or threat of force (the law), then you are neither decent nor a good neighbor.
Agree, which is why I reject the claim that biblical mythology is metaphor. When the book says that a day has a sunrise and a sunset, and that God rested on the seventh day and so must you once every week, that means a 24-hour day, not a metaphorical day as with "back in the day."
And I see no reason to assume that "God fearing" was not originally literal and later morphed into something else. Perhaps it wasn't, but I have no knowledge presently either way, and do the default is to take the words at face value.
The god of Abraham associated with so many words like fear, terrible, jealous that we're told today don't mean what they say. I suspect that the character of the god has evolved over time. We see that between the Old and New Testaments - God goes from a vicious warlord ordering genocides and the taking of slaves to a kinder, gentler model for whom words like fear, terrible, and jealous are seldom used, and with that, the old language is redefined such that God fearing now means God loving.
What do you think?
..but how does that apply to 'a seal' ?
It renders it meaningless .. they can't all be 'seals'.
I mean, it would be as if G-d changed His mind .. which He doesn't.
Not exactly .. I believe it was a dream .. and G-d stopped him, saying it was fulfilled.He told Abraham go and kill your son..
We have Juma'a..He had told the Jews to keep the Sabath Covenant forever, even in Quran retells the story but Allah later did not require that Law anymore on the Quran..
So, even if He told you Muhamamd is the Final, It is upto Him. God can erase what He wrote in the Quran.
You repeat questions. We've been through this before. I'm not going through you ignoring all evidence again. I'm not pasting what @firedragon showed you nor going to talk about the other verse with this same word.
Yes Arab scholars didn't need to. The ones who did so did a mistake.
Kosher food is part of Mosaic law, and that was only for the twelve tribes of Israel.Here's a thing, laid out in chronological order.
Jews say eating pig is forbidden.
Christians say pig is not forbidden.
Muslims say eating pig is forbidden.
Bahai's say eating pig is not forbidden.
The hadith doesn't mention a "seal". You didn't provide any facts.The facts are on my side, not yours. From my #298 which quotes from Bukhari 4953:
Irrelevant.I'd say that the religions themselves are responsible for the antipathy they receive. I have a negative view of the dominant religion in America, and it comes from watching the behavior of its adherents. Look at them - banning books, besetting LGBTQ+, limiting abortion access, trying to eliminate contraceptives and no-fault divorce, demonizing atheists, and trying to put religious scripture in schoolrooms.
Do you think that somebody put those ideas into my head by "spreading falsehood and hatred toward religion"? If you do, you're wrong. I have no ill will for the Wiccans and Buddhists (for example) because I am unaware of any reason to feel otherwise. It's the religions themselves and seeing what they turn people into that puts such ideas into my head through observation and induction, not indoctrination.
Not exactly .. I believe it was a dream .. and G-d stopped him, saying it was fulfilled.
We have Juma'a..
By that token, G-d can erase our intelligence and common sense.
Here's a thing, laid out in chronological order.
Jews say eating pig is forbidden.
Christians say pig is not forbidden.
Muslims say eating pig is forbidden.
Bahai's say eating pig is not forbidden.
Looks to me, that people make lawful what seems good to them. They will always find an excuse.
..but we only fool ourselves. satan causes loss.
So what?The hadith doesn't mention a "seal".
The facts relating to the sealed book are from the books of Isaiah, Daniel, and Revelation.You didn't provide any facts.
You said it does, now you say "so what"? I think you have an internal conflict. Ciao.So what?
No, I didn't.You said it does