Aupmanyav
Be your own guru
There, you escape all arguments - 'cannot be explained'. Science is very thorough about explanations.Elohim is more than a belief because of signs that cannot be reasonably explained in terms of mundane causes.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There, you escape all arguments - 'cannot be explained'. Science is very thorough about explanations.Elohim is more than a belief because of signs that cannot be reasonably explained in terms of mundane causes.
Science is the wrong discipline for this because divine beings are not scientifically testable.There, you escape all arguments - 'cannot be explained'. Science is very thorough about explanations.
Use your imagination!Now, for what reason you assume that 'non-physical' exists?
Hadiths are nice stories. They say Muhammad played with Aisha's dolls. Bukhari or al-Kulaynī ar-Rāzī. Mostly 9th Century writers.An Angel came to him .. that which he knew not." (96.1-5).
Bukhari 4953
The pedo prophet story is not consistent with the timeline of events relating to the age of Aisha. Mainstream Islam doesn't like this because Bukhari is supposed to be a reliable source.Hadiths are nice stories. They say Muhammad played with Aisha's dolls. Bukhari or al-Kulaynī ar-Rāzī. Mostly 9th Century writers.
Mate. Even if you staunchly believe the Qur'an says "Torah" and that refers to the Jewish Torah, Isiah is still not the Torah or part of the Torah. You can never in your life twist it into or even make an effort.Yes it does.
An Angel came to him and asked him to read. Allah's Messenger replied, "I do not know how to read." The Prophet added, "Then the Angel held me (forcibly) and pressed me so hard that I felt distressed. Then he released me and again asked me to read, and I replied, 'I do not know how to read.' Thereupon he held me again and pressed me for the second time till I felt distressed. He then released me and asked me to read, but again I replied. 'I do not know how to read.' Thereupon he held me for the third time and pressed me till I got distressed, and then he released me and said, 'Read, in the Name of your Lord Who has created (all that exists), has created man out of a clot, Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous. Who has taught (the writing) by the pen, has taught man that which he knew not." (96.1-5).
Bukhari 4953
Not the entire book, obviously. I posted two single verses which appear in both.
Let's say some one says "pedo". This hypocrite, should realize that no pedo marries people older than himself and divorcees. And wonder why that sick minded person who constantly speaks about this believes in this hadith. Not all ahadith. Cherry picker? That's the epitome of hypocrisy.The pedo prophet story is not consistent with the timeline of events relating to the age of Aisha. Mainstream Islam doesn't like this because Bukhari is supposed to be a reliable source.
I have already said that Hadiths are stories to propagate a faith. All religions have them in one form or the other.Hadiths are nice stories. They say Muhammad played with Aisha's dolls. Bukhari or al-Kulaynī ar-Rāzī. Mostly 9th Century writers.
I'm not interested in your strawman.Mate. Even if you staunchly believe the Qur'an says "Torah" and that refers to the Jewish Torah, Isiah is still not the Torah or part of the Torah. You can never in your life twist it into or even make an effort.
It's not hypocrisy, it's an expression of prejudice.Let's say some one says "pedo". This hypocrite, should realize that no pedo marries people older than himself and divorcees. And wonder why that sick minded person who constantly speaks about this believes in this hadith. Not all ahadith. Cherry picker? That's the epitome of hypocrisy.
Read up on what a strawman is. Ciao.I'm not interested in your strawman.
Cute.It's not hypocrisy, it's an expression of prejudice.
Are you denying that your argument was a strawman?Read up on what a strawman is.
Mate. I am not gonna engage with these kind of preaching and rhetorical exchanges.Are you denying that your argument was a strawman?
It's a simple question which exposes the disingenuous nature of your argument.Mate. I am not gonna engage with these kind of preaching and rhetorical exchanges.
Bye Bye Mate.It's a simple question which exposes the disingenuous nature of your argument.
No, only a disbeliever and evil transgressor would say this.Muhammad is last in status/rank on the vertical axis, not the last in time, please, right?
How would you know that, if you are not one of them?No, only a disbeliever and evil transgressor would say this.
Quran refers to the Scriptures that is with the people of the Book.It's a simple question which exposes the disingenuous nature of your argument.