Curious George
Veteran Member
This is merely rectifying the disgusting indifference to the depravities visited upon the Christian populations displayed by the previous administration. 1/2 of 1 percent of refugees accepted into America were Christian. When almost 13 thousand refugees were admitted in 2016, less than 70 were Christian.
There was an effective ban on Christian refugees here under Obama; can you point out to me the threads here calling him out as a bigoted monster for that affront?
I see a mass of people trying to escape atrocities. It seems we agree that when this is the case that people should help. It seems we disagree on how the line of people should be organized. Giving Christians cutsies and sending Muslims to the back of the line does not seem like the most secular policy.
Nor does slowing the line because the country has a majority of Muslims seem to be very secular.
Mind, if this was not presented as the rationale and the cards just fell that way, we could have a different conversation. Instead we are dealing with an act that was publicly touted because of the religious component. In short, we see intent with this act to discriminate against Muslims and favor non-muslims, but no intentions with prior acts to discriminate against xtians.