For good reason. The vast majority of women and trans men don't pose a threat to biological males. Women are given cause to have same-sex spaces and it's why society has sex-segregated spaces rather than gender-identifying segregation.
According to
RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network), which is the nation's largest anti-sexual violence organization and operates the National Sexual Assault Hotline:
• 1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime (14.8% completed, 2.8% attempted). Whereas about 3% of American men—or 1 in 33—have experienced an attempted or completed rape in their lifetime.
View attachment 83262
And per the
Bureau of Judicial Statistics:
The most frightening form of rape, an assault by a total stranger, was the most common. More than 75 percent of all rapes involved one victim and one offender, and most offenders were unarmed. Most victims offered some form of resistance. The most common responses to the situation were trying to get help; resisting physically; to threatening, arguing, or reasoning with the offender; or resisting without force.
The
CDC reports similar numbers and notes,
Over half of women and almost 1 in 3 men have experienced sexual violence involving physical contact during their lifetimes. One in 4 women and about 1 in 26 men have experienced completed or attempted rape. Additionally, 1 in 3 women and about 1 in 9 men experienced sexual harassment in a public place.
It's common in these discussions for gynophobic arguments to be dismissive of women's needs and concerns, but they are real and ever present nonetheless. Instead of waving off the matter, the issue at hand is what to do to address the needs and safety of biological females if same-sex spaces are to be phased out?
Predators are opportunists and that will influence current statistics, and not for the better. Just like any other group, biological women have real world concerns based in real world needs due to real world threats. So perhaps the conversation should shift, in part, on what to do for this group while addressing the wants of another group instead of debaters writing it off as nothing more than unfounded alarmism, hyperbole, or political maneuvering.