• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

God’s Method of delivering messages, is it flawed?

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Like for everything else, you have no proof of Adam, Abraham, Noah and Moses to be historical. All your beliefs are without foundation.
I never said I have proof. That is why they are called beliefs.
What do you base your beliefs on? Nothing? No, on something written down by your prophet. What does he base this claim on? Or, does he just say, "those guys were real" and move on? At least Christians base their beliefs on the Bible. But, like I've said over and over, Baha'i reject the Bible stories about these supposed messengers. And the Bible stories don't even make them out to be special manifestation/messengers.

If there are planets without life in THIS Solar system, why do you think it would be any different in any other solar system?
I don't know and I don't care. I am not a scientist.
Should science and religion hand and hand? If so, then when Baha'u'llah says something very questionable, like there being life on every planet, then we could check to see what science has to say about that. Should we, or should we not care and accept it as true simply because Baha'u'llah said so?

What you and others consider falsehood I consider the Truth from God. You cannot prove that it isn't anymore than I can prove it is. No matter what you say that you believe disproves my beliefs I will have an explanation for it, but I do not expect you to accept my explanation.
And Christians believe Jesus rose from the dead. Mormons believe Jesus came to the Americas. Was it the truth that God wanted a blood sacrifice to atone for the sins of the people?
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
YOu are claiming that what you believe is true.
There is no claim.
I believe that what I believe is true.

Now tell me why I do not have a right to believe that.
It seems to bother some people. Why do you think it bothers them?
What other people believe doesn't bother me at all.
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Yes, the evidence from the Bible.

Do we accept those Bible stories as evidence that God is real? No. Same thing with the written "evidence" about God and Jesus in the NT. No. So a flaw is that Jews and Christians were expected to believe those stories as evidence. Atheists and Baha'is reject those stories.
I consider the Bible "in its entirety" to be evidence of God, evidence that God exists. THE STORIES ans whether they are fictional or fact DOES NOT MATTER. The Bible has to be considered in its entirety.
Yet, atheists and people in the other religions are expected to accept the "evidence" presented by Baha'u'llah? Which is what? His writings? His person? The fulfillment of prophecies from Scriptures we can't trust? Fulfillment of predictions he made?
Nobody EXPECTS anyone to believe in God or in Baha'u'llah. Belief is a choice and it cannot be conditioned upon what other people believe. Baha'u'llah wrote:

“For the faith of no man can be conditioned by any one except himself.” Gleanings, p. 143

Baha'u'llah clearly stated what the evidence is. Baha’u’llah enjoined us to look at His own Self (His character), His Revelation (His works, which can be seen in Baha'i history), and His words (His Writings).

“Say: The first and foremost testimony establishing His truth is His own Self. Next to this testimony is His Revelation. For whoso faileth to recognize either the one or the other He hath established the words He hath revealed as proof of His reality and truth. This is, verily, an evidence of His tender mercy unto men. He hath endowed every soul with the capacity to recognize the signs of God. How could He, otherwise, have fulfilled His testimony unto men, if ye be of them that ponder His Cause in their hearts. He will never deal unjustly with any one, neither will He task a soul beyond its power. He, verily, is the Compassionate, the All-Merciful.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 105-106


I consider the fulfillment of prophecies and the predictions Baha'u'llah made that came to pass as icing on the cake, but it IS NOT the cake; it is not Baha'u'llah enjoined us to look at,
Then once we accept him as being from God, we then have to accept everything he said as being true? We have to believe his plan for peace is going to work?
IF you accepted Baha'u'llah as being from God THEN the logical thing to do would be to accept everything He wrote as true. But you don't accept that so I do not expect that you would accept anything He said is true.
No, no, wait. Let's hear some of the things he has said and see if we believe they are true... like the thing about the creatures on every planet. Then how will the laws supposedly sent from God really work and how will they be enforced. Lots of things to question and doubt.

The first ones being... Is there a God? Has God been consistent with his messages and his laws? Does he send messengers that are special creations that are the only ones that can hear and understand God and then tell us what God wants? Again, have these messengers been consistent with what they say about God? Have they been perfect reflections of God? Not necessarily, the stories about them are inconsistent with what they say about God and what he wants from people. And that is explained by saying that the people that wrote the messages maybe got it wrong? And the people that interpreted those messages got it wrong? Well then those things we thought we knew about God can't be trusted. Why trust what Baha'is are saying now? Are there "flaws" in the things we are hearing?
I am sure I have already explained all of this from my perspective. Is there any reason why I should explain it again? Are you getting any closer to understanding?

Keep questioning and keep doubting. I did my questioning and I got my answers so I have no more reason to doubt. Or maybe it was just that I was guided by God because I had faith, so I did not have many doubts from day one.

It is all in our perspective when we embark upon the search for truth. If you only look for flaws that is what you will find.
If you cannot change that way of looking at things you will never see what Baha'is see, that there are no flaws.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
If you say, "I believe this is true"... isn't that a claim?
It is a belief, not a claim.

Claim: state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=claim+means

Claim: to say that something is true or is a fact, although you cannot prove it and other people might not believe it: CLAIM | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary

Belief:
1. an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists.
"his belief in the value of hard work"

2. trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something.
"a belief in democratic politics"
https://www.google.com/search

Belief:
the feeling of being certain that something exists or is true:
His belief in God gave him hope during difficult times.
Recent scandals have shaken many people's belief in (= caused people to have doubts about) politicians.
BELIEF | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
And you do have the proof that convinced you. But, I know, every time you share it, it gets rejected. And why is that? Because it is unprovable proof? Well then, is it really proof? Again, I know, it is to you.
I never said it was proof. I said it was evidence. If it was proof it would not be a belief, it would be a fact.
I believe that my belief is true. I cannot prove it is true (to anyone except myself) so it is not a fact.
We see that as a "flaw".
See it however you want to see it, I am not trying to stop you from seeing it that way.
Baha'is don't. They see it as God opening the eyes of those that trust him and his messenger, and keeping the eyes closed of those that don't want to believe but that want to keep doubting and questioning. Nothing will convince those kinds of people. No "evidence" is good enough for them. That's like throwing something valuable to people who don't appreciate it. Those no good bums! But are they really blind and so full of doubt that nothing will convince them? Or, are the answers to their questions flawed and unconvincing?
Why are you asking me, or are you? Apparently you consider the answers we give you flawed and unconvincing, so I do not understand why you ask the same questions over and over again. :confused: Why not just accept that you will never believe in God or Baha'u'llah, or go looking somewhere else for answers, or just do as most atheists do, settle for being an atheist and enjoy the only life you believe you have?

No blame is assigned to anyone. We simply see what you do not see. There are reasons for that that only you know, and God also knows because God is All-Knowing.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Let me pull a Trailblazer tactic... "Give me an example? When have I ever attacked you personally? I'm only answering posts here."
That is not a tactic, it was just a question, apparently a question you cannot answer, so you deflected. Deflection is a tactic some nonbelievers employ in order to avoid the HONEST questions that believers ask them. I can give you examples.

Here is an example of a personal attack:
CG Didymus said: Sorry, if you don't know, none of us here can help you. The first thing you need to do is admit it to yourself. "I, Trailblazer, sometimes say things that may sound disrespectful."

I consider that a personal attack because it is a negative comment about me that implies that I am being disrespectful of others, that I am not "admitting" something to myself, that I am in denial.
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
Many of those messengers are possibly mythical. Baha'is don't believe the stories written about them. All they have is Baha'u'llah saying they were real. Yes, when have I ever doubted that all you have is the word of your messenger when he says that all those other messengers were real. In other words, for those that don't believe that Baha'u'llah is a real messenger from God, there is no "evidence" that the others are real.

Good morning CG - Today the 18th is the Birth of the Bab, tomorrow the 19th is the Birth of Baha'u'llah the Twin holy days. I wish you all the best on these very special days for Baha'i.

I came across this last night, it is some time since I had read this book, I wish I had read it more now The Promised Day Is Come | Bahá’í Reference Library

This is the Section called 'The Continuity of Revelation' and Shoghi Effendi has offered this, to which any Baha'i should consider deeply in any rely they choose to give;

"The Faith standing identified with the name of Bahá’u’lláh disclaims any intention to belittle any of the Prophets gone before Him, to whittle down any of their teachings, to obscure, however slightly, the radiance of their Revelations, to oust them from the hearts of their followers, to abrogate the fundamentals of their doctrines, to discard any of their revealed Books, or to suppress the legitimate aspirations of their adherents. Repudiating the claim of any religion to be the final revelation of God to man, disclaiming finality for His own Revelation, Bahá’u’lláh inculcates the basic principle of the relativity of religious truth, the continuity of Divine Revelation, the progressiveness of religious experience. His aim is to widen the basis of all revealed religions and to unravel the mysteries of their scriptures. He insists on the unqualified recognition of the unity of their purpose, restates the eternal verities they enshrine, coordinates their functions, distinguishes the essential and the authentic from the nonessential and spurious in their teachings, separates the God-given truths from the priest-prompted superstitions, and on this as a basis proclaims the possibility, and even prophecies the inevitability, of their unification, and the consummation of their highest hopes.............."

This book does not hold back, it is a masterpiece, Shoghi Effendi quotes Baha'u'llah often and it lays out the Faith from the beginning, the warnings given and the future we face.

It would be a challenging book for a Christian of Muslim to read, but in the light of the above comment, all should. They one and all would face great personal conflicts.

My question is that where does he get his evidence? He makes up his own stories about Krishna, Adam, Noah and Abraham. Where did he get those stories? From God or is he getting it from non-Biblical writings?

Baha'u'llah (Glory of God) is the source of all knowledge to the material world. There is numerous writings available as to how this Revelation flowed from Baha'ullah's lips and Pen for hours on end that no secretary could keep up with

".....When Bahá’u’lláh returned to Baghdád, His Kurdish admirers followed. The sight of ‘ulamá and Ṣúfí shaykhs flocking to visit Bahá’u’lláh astonished the religious leaders of the city, who also began to seek His presence—and became enthralled. Their esteem for Him in turn attracted others, from poets and mystics to government officials, and further spread His fame.

This period, Shoghi Effendi tells us, saw an “enormous expansion in the scope and volume of Bahá’u’lláh’s writings ... The verses that streamed during those years from His pen, described as ‘a copious rain’ by Himself, whether in the form of epistles, exhortations, commentaries, apologies, dissertations, prophecies, prayers, odes or specific Tablets” revivified and transformed the Bábí community. It was a period so prolific that, on average, the unrecorded verses He would reveal in a single day and night equalled in number those of the Qur’án. “As to those verses which He either dictated or wrote Himself, their number was no less remarkable than either the wealth of material they contained, or the diversity of subjects to which they referred.”

So in one 24 hour period, Baha'u'llah at that time was revealing (unrecorded) verses equivalent to the size of the Quran, let alone what was managed to be recorded. No learning needed, no references needed, no prior thought needed. This has many things written about how revelation came and how during this revelation people would enter with questions, forget what they were going to ask in their astonishment of the revelation, only to find their question answered some time later during the talk.

Oh, and even with your little "Do you understand" type of things you say, do you mean them in a respectful way? Or, is that your way of saying, "What's a matter with you? Are you dense or something?"

I see Trailblazer means no disrespect, I do see years of frustration welling within our souls, but that is our flaw CG. If what is being offered is what it is, then you may see the frustration had some merit. In saying that, frustration is only good if it enables to turn it into action.

Regards Tony
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Many of those messengers are possibly mythical. Baha'is don't believe the stories written about them. All they have is Baha'u'llah saying they were real.
That's right.
Yes, when have I ever doubted that all you have is the word of your messenger when he says that all those other messengers were real. In other words, for those that don't believe that Baha'u'llah is a real messenger from God, there is no "evidence" that the others are real.
That's right, unless you consider the Bible to be evidence.
My question is that where does he get his evidence? He makes up his own stories about Krishna, Adam, Noah and Abraham. Where did he get those stories? From God or is he getting it from non-Biblical writings?
Baha'u'llah got His knowledge from God. I believe that because that is exactly what He wrote:

“O KING! I was but a man like others, asleep upon My couch, when lo, the breezes of the All-Glorious were wafted over Me, and taught Me the knowledge of all that hath been. This thing is not from Me, but from One Who is Almighty and All-Knowing. And He bade Me lift up My voice between earth and heaven, and for this there befell Me what hath caused the tears of every man of understanding to flow.” Proclamation of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 57
Oh, and even with your little "Do you understand" type of things you say, do you mean them in a respectful way? Or, is that your way of saying, "What's a matter with you? Are you dense or something?"
I am glad you asked. I am asking if you understand because I want to know if what I said was understood. It has nothing to do with me thinking you are dense. You are anything but dense, but that does not mean that you understand everything I say. Maybe I need to explain it better and that is why I ask if you understand.
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
Should science and religion hand and hand? If so, then when Baha'u'llah says something very questionable, like there being life on every planet, then we could check to see what science has to say about that. Should we, or should we not care and accept it as true simply because Baha'u'llah said so?

I never said it was proof. I said it was evidence. If it was proof it would not be a belief, it would be a fact.
I believe that my belief is true. I cannot prove it is true (to anyone except myself) so it is not a fact.

How about we look at what are Proofs for Truth with a couple of quotes from Abul'lbaha.

Decisive proof - (Most likely relative) "...One who is wise in the ways of God sees that his words and deeds reflect the glory of God. I hope that the light of this glory may shine forth from each one of you, for this is the decisive proof - for this Bahá'u'lláh suffered - that he might educate men to become the educators of the world and spread truth abroad...." So this is relative to our choices.

Clear Proof - (Most likely relative) "...A clear proof of validity lies in the achievements and here we are confronted by certain irrefutable facts. The prophets have come from the lowliest and most humiliated of the nations and in each age the prophet has raised his downtrodden nation to the highest zenith of prosperity and success among the nations of the earth...." So again relative to our choices.

Supreme Proof - (Most likely relative) "....A supreme proof is the teaching. For instance the precepts of Christ were sufficient proof of his validity. There is no greater proof than these teachings. They were the light of that cycle and the spirit of that age. All that he said accorded with the needs of the humanity of that time. They were peerless and unique..." So again relative to out mind and choice.

Greatest Proofs - (Most likely relative) "......Consider His Holiness Bahá'u'lláh and his teaching. They are the spirit of this cycle - the light of this age. They illumine the dark places of humanity, for they address themselves to the heart of the race. For instance, the greatest evil of this century is war. In the new age Bahá'u'lláh has prohibited war. The need of this century is universal peace - Bahá'u'lláh has instituted it. The most urgent requisite of mankind is the declaration of the oneness of the world of humanity - this is the great principle of Bahá'u'lláh. That which will leaven the human world is a love that will insure the abandonment of pride, oppression and hatred. The principles of Bahá'u'lláh are the remedy and balm for the wounded world; and without their inculcation, reconciliation between the nations will not be reached. These very teachings of Bahá'u'lláh are the greatest proofs of his claim. Such a power hath appeared from him as will suffice to convince the whole world...." So again relative to out mind and choice.

In the end the proof of the sun is its light and heat. So that is relative to where we are, in a completely closed cold dark room, or outside on a clear hot day, we see material Light and feel material heat to those extents. Likewise In the Spirit we see the spiritual light and feel the spiritual heat to the extent we choose to come out from the dark and cold room of not knowing God.

So what is an Absolute Proof? To another it may be relative.

Regards Tony
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
What do you base your beliefs on? Nothing? No, on something written down by your prophet.
That, but not only that. Before I became a Baha'i in 1970 I read very little of what Baha'u'llah wrote. I read books like Baha'u'llah and the New Era and Baha'i World Faith (Abdu'l-Baha's section).
What does he base this claim on?
A revelation from God
Or, does he just say, "those guys were real" and move on?

How do you think that Baha'u'llah knew those guys were real?
He does not say how He knows but I assume it is related to His Revelation from God.
At least Christians base their beliefs on the Bible. But, like I've said over and over, Baha'i reject the Bible stories about these supposed messengers. And the Bible stories don't even make them out to be special manifestation/messengers.
The Bible was written for people living in another age of history. At that time people were not ready to understand the concept of Manifestations of God and how they all came from the same God. Jesus said He had many things to say but people could not bear to hear them back then but they would be revealed in the future.

John 16:12-13 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Should science and religion hand and hand? If so, then when Baha'u'llah says something very questionable, like there being life on every planet, then we could check to see what science has to say about that. Should we, or should we not care and accept it as true simply because Baha'u'llah said so?
I did not even accept that as literally true, and I am a Baha'i. ;)

I went on the internet to see what science had to say but I could not find one website wherein scientists said it has been proven that there is no life on any other planets. In short, that means we don't know but that means that Baha'u'llah could be right.
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
Can you explain why you think that is our flaw? I just want to understand how you see it. :)

To me It can be both a virtue or a flaw. Love is the same, it depends how we use it.

For me frustration mostly leads to my already limited patience, making me even less patient, I have seen that in me on RF ;) That in turn prevents me from fully listening to what a person is saying, trying to understand a point of view, before giving a reply. Thus more misunderstanding arises building more frustration. Then there is replies that are only aimed to foster frustration, with those one has to learn to be more self disciplined.

On the other hand, frustration at times allows me to consider the topic more deeply and from that meditation I may find completely different ideas or other paths of thought, or even be motivated to undertake an activity, so in that way it becomes a motivating factor.

Regards Tony
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
In the end the proof of the sun is its light and heat. So that is relative to where we are, in a completely closed cold dark room, or outside on a clear hot day, we see material Light and feel material heat to those extents. Likewise In the Spirit we see the spiritual light and feel the spiritual heat to the extent we choose to come out from the dark and cold room of not knowing God.
God’s grace and mercy come to the world by means of the Messengers of God. If for one moment God’s mercy and grace were to be withheld from the world, it would completely perish. The fact that people are “unaware” of this does not mean it is not true. One who does not know God’s Messengers is like a plant growing in the shade. That reminded me of this quote:

“One who does not know God’s Messengers, however, is like a plant growing in the shade. Although it knows not the sun, it is, nevertheless, absolutely dependent on it. The great Prophets are spirits suns, and Bahá’u’lláh is the sun of this “day” in which we live. The suns of former days have warmed and vivified the world, and had those suns not shone, the earth would not be cold and dead, but it is the sunshine of today that alone can ripen the fruits which the suns of former days have kissed into life.”
Bahá’u’lláh and the New Era, p. 72
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Which is a claim that what you believe is true.
It is not a claim because I am not claiming it is true. I believe it is true.

CG Didymus said: If you say, "I believe this is true"... isn't that a claim?

Trailblazer said: It is a belief, not a claim.


Claim: state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=claim+means

Claim: to say that something is true or is a fact, although you cannot prove it and other people might not believe it: CLAIM | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary

Belief:
1. an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists.
"his belief in the value of hard work"

2. trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something.
"a belief in democratic politics"
https://www.google.com/search

Belief:
the feeling of being certain that something exists or is true:
His belief in God gave him hope during difficult times.
Recent scandals have shaken many people's belief in (= caused people to have doubts about) politicians.
BELIEF | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
 

Ancient Soul

The Spiritual Universe
I said: No, it is not, because I could not care less what other people think of me unless I am truly dishonest or treating others badly, but since I am not........

There is no deception there.
You just cannot see it for what it is, you being unable to look at yourself but rather constantly looking at others and criticizing them. That's sad but I am not responsible for your character, you are.

Carry on. You only dig your grave deeper.

I wonder why nobody else on this forums sees what you see? Are you All-Knowing and All-Wise?

Look, you got caught, so don't keep on trying to change it into something else to avoid facing what you did.
 

Ancient Soul

The Spiritual Universe
Funny thing is I have been on this forum for three years and nobody but you says that I am playing crappy games of avoidance. All they see is me answering their questions day and night. For anyone with any logical abilities, that says that you are the one with the problem, not me.

And yet I've see others who are always trying to keep you on track as you keep avoiding their statements.
 

Ancient Soul

The Spiritual Universe
"If you weren't so blind you'd see. And when you do finally see, you will know how blind you were." Yeah, I'm starting to get it. Talk in riddles that confounds the people into thinking you're really saying something important. How 'bout this one... "You will find the answers to your questions when you stop trying to fight it, and just let the wafting of the divine breezes do their wafting."

LOL again!

You've got their game nailed perfectly.
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
It is not a claim because I am not claiming it is true. I believe it is true.
Sticking the words "I believe" before the sentence does not change the fact that you are claiming that it is true. This is not a game of Simon says.

X exists is a claim. Doesn't matter if X is a god or grass.
 
Top