I won't stop because I believe it is evidence.
Here is how I see it:
Atheists say they require evidence but when they are presented with evidence they say
"that's not evidence."
The reason they say that is because what was presented to them
is not evidence to them since it does not help to prove
to them that the belief is true, and the body of facts or information presented to them does not indicate
to them that the belief is true.
But that does not mean it is not
evidence, by the definitions of the word evidence,
Evidence: anything that
helps to prove that something is or is not true:
EVIDENCE | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
Evidence: the available body of facts or information
indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid:
https://www.google.com/search
because what is evidence to one person is not necessarily evidence to another person; so they should not say say "that's not evidence" but rather they should say "that's not evidence to me." Otherwise I consider what they say to be self-centered and arrogant, and frankly, I am sick of listening to it. Who the hell do they think they are to be defining what evidence is? They would not see the evidence for God if it hit them in the head.