God And Homosexuality

[rational experiences]

The Lord doesn't think homosexual sin is insignificant. Did you miss God's demolition of Sodom and Gomorrah?

O God is the planet of stone.

Humans owned natural human life first as origin to bio existence with the Garden Nature on Earth.

Invented a thesis for a machine...and involved God the stone....to rebuild the mountain by a pyramid, but included the UFO metal....so as God owned minerals...he had to melt those minerals to try to make them as hot as the UFO.

But he also had to water cool those minerals to own building of a machine, to transmit what he says is ra form...RA DI AT ION.

To radiate, means gases burning own light that radiate light...they do not own METAL.

I in science male symbolism, human inferred is intensity of magnetism, or in other words lets heat up the Earth core and make it radiate as God.....which in laymans terms means let us make holes in the Earth and force the very hot underground lava that is very hot as compared to volcanic water/air cooled lava and bring it up the surface...and change the ground surface temperature of God...and open God the body of Earth into HELL. As EL if everyone remembers old science means God and He means the male scientist liar.

God cities were feed back radiation etched old building structures that own human identified notification.

China began to gain the Sodom and Gomorrah God stone attack by imaging their building/cities irradiated converting mass into the sky.

Where it occurs first, communication of RA, the UFO event changes the image feed back status.

So what we live in is first re imaged in the God gases...which is not correct, for the ground mass already owned heating of God minerals to own buildings.

When God the planet gets rid of Sodom and Gomorrah as ANGEL advice...meaning what fell out of God radiation PHI ground hits...the ANGEL of GOD that first makes sink holes, notifies God is being removed by the SUN GOD RA.

Then next moment the cities in the mountains, the OLD TEMPLES of GOD, as etched into all mountains around the Earth globe....get eradicated....which means they either melt as stone or simply disintegrate into sand.

How God sends his early warning Messenger of advice in the ANGELS...what you see happening in fact.

The Temples of God the stone cities of Sodom and Gomorrah history are everywhere. If you study the stone closer, in many movie scenes I once thought oh real Temples seemed melted shut...whereas they are irradiated fallout imaged signals fed back to the ground...by UFO cause.

 

[Mitty]

But Romans 1:26-27 clearly speaks about homosexuality between women and men.

Nonsense. Romans 1:26-27 does not says anything about female homosexuality, or "women with women, working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet" from penetrative sex.

And where does Leviticus 18 & 20 say that it is disgusting for women to lie with womankind as with mankind?

Or are you just trying to grasp at imaginary straws by claiming that Romans 1:26-27 describes female genitalia as "vile" and "unseemly"?

 

[rational experiences]

Nonsense. Romans 1:26-27 does not says anything about female homosexuality, or "women with women, working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet" from penetrative sex.

Who is talking about human being life bodies, sexual choices, and feelings that are human owned in the presence of humans, all created and life owned today by sperm and an ovary?

Even if a scientist claims let me talk about humans having sex...what does that have to do with your science...….other than you are a Satanic or Luciferian scientific liar coercer who takes the information scientific occult attack on human life, in nature and the truth, as you bore holes in the God body...as per mountain pyramid original theme...to cause it actually, Removal of the body of God, pretending however.

For that is what a theory first is pretending YOU, personally are doing it when the Sun was...and UFO.

Then today when any human challenges the scientist, he lies about what he did to Planet Earth. claiming oh what a non sensical human statement you make about God, science of the occult knows that it was UFO MASS METAL that did it and owns it....you are all stupid he says as the coercer.

With the origin of intention to use that MASS of the Sun to remove physical God stone presence in its natural MASS...the only way that you unseal and remove energy on Earth as a scientist. And it is actually what he does, lies about actually making God the stone be removed for he claims his theory does not make God be removed at all as if his UFO metal mass = God the stone.

So logical real human consciousness has to then quote him....okay liar, is God the stone a UFO sun mass or the presence in our bio heavens as stone?

Yes he would say, God is seated on the stone throne of God, the planet in the heavens….how a Satanist scientist Destroyer coerces real information into falsification of what he is causing.

 

[Tazarah]

Nonsense. Romans 1:26-27 does not says anything about female homosexuality, or "women with women, working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet" from penetrative sex.

And where does Leviticus 18 & 20 say that it is disgusting for women to lie with womankind as with mankind?

Or are you just trying to grasp at imaginary straws by claiming that Romans 1:26-27 describes female genitalia as "vile" and "unseemly"?

Please address the first part of my last response to you regarding your assertions about anal sex.

I ask you again -- where does Romans 1:26-27 say that men were having anal sex with women? It doesn't say that. It says that men stopped being with women and began to lust after other men, and that they were punished for it.

Romans 1:26 says that women changed their natural use to that which was not natural. The next verse says that the men did the same thing as the women, left what was natural and lusted after other men.

If it says that men, like the women, left what was natural and began to lust after other men -- then what does this mean that the women did?

 

[Mitty]

Please address the first part of my last response to you regarding your assertions about anal sex.

I ask you again -- where does Romans 1:26-27 say that men were having anal sex with women? It doesn't say that. It says that men stopped being with women and began to lust after other men, and that they were punished for it.

Romans 1:26 says that women changed their natural use to that which was not natural. The next verse says that the men did the same thing as the women, left what was natural and lusted after other men.

If it says that men, like the women, left what was natural and began to lust after other men -- then what does this mean that the women did?

So where does the bible say that anal sex is "the natural use of the woman" given that Romans 1:27 obviously describes men with men having anal sex which Paul described as "vile" and "unseemly" and described in Leviticus 18 & 20 as disgusting. Which is why Romans 1:26-27 says nothing about female homosexuality or "women with women", and why Leviticus 18 & 20 doesn't say that it is disgusting for women to lie with womankind as with mankind.

 

[rational experiences]

Please address the first part of my last response to you regarding your assertions about anal sex.

I ask you again -- where does Romans 1:26-27 say that men were having anal sex with women? It doesn't say that. It says that men stopped being with women and began to lust after other men, and that they were punished for it.

Romans 1:26 says that women changed their natural use to that which was not natural. The next verse says that the men did the same thing as the women, left what was natural and lusted after other men.

If it says that men, like the women, left what was natural and began to lust after other men -- then what does this mean that the women did?

Science is trying to claim scientific advice for their machines and machine reactions today about human sexual preferences or reasons for why humans changed sexuality itself!

Reason is logical. A human is the inventor of FAKE......ARTIFICIAL......SATANIC lying science quotes about METAL that God owns as minerals as God natural history.

You irradiated natural life and human consciousness changed in bio chemical behaviours and changed their sexuality as a scientific medical observation.

Medical observation does not own machine reactions as controlled by the bio life liar scientific Satanist....machine builder/designer, who today in human life has machine sex with his robots. So a scientist with a real conscious self identification, LIFE SACRIFICED told you that you were replacing human bio life with machines...and knew you were.

All evidence supports that you are...for the bible does not today own your NEW occult updated perver SIONS.

 

[Tazarah]

So where does the bible say that anal sex is "the natural use of the woman" given that Romans 1:27 obviously describes men with men having anal sex which Paul described as "vile" and "unseemly" and described in Leviticus 18 & 20 as disgusting. Which is why Romans 1:26-27 says nothing about female homosexuality or "women with women", and why Leviticus 18 & 20 doesn't say that it is disgusting for women to lie with womankind as with mankind.

Okay, I'm starting to think that you're a troll. You're just repeating the same thing over and over again and not responding to any of the points I make.

 

[Mitty]

Okay

And unless you can describe what the men were working with men which Paul described as "vile" and "unseemly" and that the bible says that anal sex is "the natural use of the woman" and that "women with women" were "working that which is unseemly" as "likewise also the men" (Romans 1:26-27) then alas you are just trolling and repeating the same thing over and over again and not responding to any of the points I make.

 

[rational experiences]

Okay, I'm starting to think that you're a troll. You're just repeating the same thing over and over again and not responding to any of the points I make.

AI old male scientist machine theist Satanic quotes to self about identification that he changed the sexual Nature of humanity on Earth by radiation fall out chemical changes to our brains.

Says the bible is just a repeating AI ENCODING...oh he says it must be a Troll then s******s in his science community claiming that an evil Troll spirit is speaking to them...identified the spirit he says.

Instead as the Bible was re written and updated constantly by the humans who owned a secret brotherhood said what perversions he caused to the life of humans.

Today should own a new order of the 10 commandments from nuclear God mass stone removal x how much mass of future history of life on Earth that he removed.

1. God the stone mass in natural history was alight burning consuming its body of gases...was stopped.
2. God mass then fused into stone, its highest form.

3. The scientist put God the Earth mass back into self consuming light gas mass removal.

4. Future life on a planet has now shrunk historically to a smaller God body that no longer supports the same life history as what a larger O stone mass planet once did….how he removes future life on Earth, as if he is removing God bodily one by one by mass...until God O the planet disappears.

5. Meanwhile he should write...child molesters...not in the Bible as a God commandment do not fiddle or molest babies or children....what is not in the new updated statements...and what else...oh, that is right and don't have pretend sex with all of your machines....yet you are.

 

[Spartan]

Have you ever actually read that story (about Sodom and Gomorrah) which has nothing whatsoever to do with homosexuality, but is about inhospitality according to Jesus (Matt 11:24 10:14-15)?

Have you never read the Bible?

Jude 7: "Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire."

 

[Spartan]

Spartan: "If you read that passage, the "thorn in the flesh" was given to Paul to keep him humble, because of the great revelations he had supernaturally received."

That's only your personal opinion...

That's not my personal opinion - THAT'S WHAT THE SCRIPTURE ACTUALLY SAYS.

2 Corinthians 12:7-9: Paul says, “And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure."

 

[metis]

I do believe that the scriptures also reflect cultural beliefs that are not intrinsically from God, thus there's a challenge of sorts to figure out which is which? IMO, scripture is largely a human attempt to try and understand God(s), thus I don't buy into inerrancy. Even Aquinas believed as such, thus believing errors, hyperbole, and mistakes in interpretation and translation could be found within the Bibles that are being used then and now.

 

[metis]

BTW, most geneticists I have read believe that homosexual tendencies are largely genetic in most cases, which is also characteristic within other primates as well, so if God made some people that way then I guess the "problem" is really not theirs.

 

[Mitty]

Have you never read the Bible?

Jude 7: "Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire."

So what!!!

And why did Jesus say that the story was about inhospitality and not about Lot's sons-in-law wanting to have sex with the two blokes in Lot's house instead of with their future wives, and is that because Jesus loved one of his disciples instead of cleaving to a wife? Or do you believe that Jesus and what he said is irrelevant?

And do you have any evidence that the writers of Jude 7 were actual eye-witnesses to the S&G story and to Lot's sexual immorality and perversion when he mocked his sons-in-law and tried to pimp their future wives and then sexually assaulted them (Gen 19)?

Or is the S&G story just an imaginative fantasy based on a volcanic eruption such as the explosive eruption of Santorini about 1650 BC and the demise of the Minoan civilization, which is also the probable source of the story of Atlantis.
History Magazine

 

[Mitty]

Spartan: "If you read that passage, the "thorn in the flesh" was given to Paul to keep him humble, because of the great revelations he had supernaturally received."



That's not my personal opinion - THAT'S WHAT THE SCRIPTURE ACTUALLY SAYS.

2 Corinthians 12:7-9: Paul says, “And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure."

..."for this thing I besought the LORD thrice, that it might desert from me."

In other words Paul had a sinful trait which he was unable to overcome, and perhaps why he chose to be celibate instead of loving one of his followers like Jesus did.

 

[Spartan]

..."for this thing I besought the LORD thrice, that it might desert from me."

In other words Paul had a sinful trait which he was unable to overcome, and perhaps why he chose to be celibate instead of loving one of his followers like Jesus did.

So you're claiming Jesus had homosexual sex with the disciple he loved (John)??

 

[Spartan]

So what!!!

So one of the major sins of Sodom and Gomorrah was homosexual sex. Please update your theology so you won't be a mouthpiece for the pro-homosexual crowd.

 

[Spartan]

BTW, most geneticists I have read believe that homosexual tendencies are largely genetic in most cases, which is also characteristic within other primates as well, so if God made some people that way then I guess the "problem" is really not theirs.

It's more likely the devil got to them, rather than God making them that way.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

It's more likely the devil got to them, rather than God making them that way.

So the devil can ticker around with genes now? How pray tell, does that happen?

 

[Mitty]

So you're claiming Jesus had homosexual sex with the disciple he loved (John)??

I have no reason to believe otherwise, given he said nothing about homosexuality except to ask his followers to accept that some men do not marry because they are so born from their mothers' wombs (Matt 19:12), and afterall he didn't deny that he was a boozer either (Matt 11:19) and didn't claim to be without sin anyway (Mark 10:18).