God is Female

[PeteC-UK]

Hi Folks..

Jo; Hmmm...how to respond to you..??...Rudely worded..??...Hardly - and not more so than your own first post to me here...And how can you even know if it is rudely worded or not -according to you you dot even read it..lol....make your mind up - either you read it,formed an opinion - or you didnt read it and are chatting nonesense here - which is it..??..

Original first hand direct testimony from those who walked and talked with Christ..?...YES - FOR SURE exists !! I dont care about your credentials as a "theologian" - FACT IS - we have ACTUAL MANUSCRIPTS - which DO claim to be DIRECTLY WRITTEN by the disciples THEMSELVES - and which we know for sure DID exist in His time and shortly thereafter,as well - church founders and other historians WROTE about them, so we know for sure its all truth and not some later fabrication (such as the bible canon for example - wholly fabricated FROM these pre existanct texts....

As such a self confessed expert - Im sure you must be familiar with the Nicea council meeting and events as recorded there..?..or as such a self confessed expert - Im equally sure you realise the Catholics themselves fully admit their own bible origins - fully in accord with that which I present..

SHOUTING..?>..Hmmm...Naaa - just laziness on my part - much easier to just hold down shift key and type, rather that click to underline, or bold or italic or whatever - then click back when its not needed..lol...LAZY my friend - that is all - though yes of course - EMPHASIS on certain key words and phrases - designed to make you realise certain truths and to GET YOU ALL THINKING !!

Im not actually trying to convince anyone anything - all about TRUTH and FREE WILL - and so I present CHRISTS truth plainly for all to see - and yes - EVERYTHING I present CAN be backed up by ORIGINAL SCRIPTURE - you know, the stuff the Disciples ACTUALLY claim that they wrote themselves

You may think it "rude" in presentation - but I think it NECASSARY - as well - I - and Christ - now have over 2000years of religious B-S to wade through and push out the way before His LEGITIMATE truth can even be heard again...Rude - would be the church that twisted His truth and gave us lies instead....So inbred now that lies are taken as truth unchallenged - except by me - and those other brave Souls who KNOW Christ and are willing to follow Him truthfully - I willl challenge the lies and hypocrasy always - as well to be honest - He asked me too and He is my mate

 

[ThePainefulTruth]

Why? Why would God, if God is omnipotent, be unable to do evil, although, admittedly, I do not believe in evil. If God is all and everything, why would God not be able to do whatever God wanted to do? You limit God by this statement, IMO.

I didn't say God would be unable to do evil, only that It would not do evil. God would, after all, have to have free will Itself in order to gift it to us. That would be an expression of God's perfection along with God's omnimax qualities.

You are very wrong about just dogs and cats. Pigs can be great pets, as I know or have known many with pet pigs. Horses can be as well, particularly the smaller breeds. Birds, particularly larger breeds can be. And so on.

Some people just want to be different. Some people like snakes or turtles as pets too. There's a reason dogs and cats are the most popular pets by a huge margin which shrinks the rest to insignificant footnotes--they have more in common with us including our being carnivorous/omnivorous, and a greater ability to express loyalty and affection.

 

[Milton Platt]

Somebody's mad already.

We know that God is Creator, yes? The One who brings forth life. Woman is the only species who can bring forth life, therefore woman is God. Men cannot bring forth life, so God cannot be male.

Somebody's really mad now.

And it's probably a dude.

Well, historically, it was angry men who flipped the whole creation story and made God male, hence the answer to the popular question, "Did God create man or did man create God?" is "BOTH" because the men who changed history into mystery wanted control. They wanted to control women, children what they were taught, grew to believe and pass on to generations until the people of today think these false teachings are fact.

First, you are assuming a god, second, why would a god have to have a sex??? Is he going to procreate with Ms. god???????

 

[JoStories]

I didn't say God would be unable to do evil, only that It would not do evil. God would, after all, have to have free will Itself in order to gift it to us. That would be an expression of God's perfection along with God's omnimax qualities.

But if one reads the Tanahk, or OT, one finds that that God did more than Its share of evil acts. Sodom being just one example of many. Of course, I don't believe that that depiction of God is even close to what is true. Examples abound, such as the alleged Great Flood but again, there is zero evidence of such a thing having happened on this earth.

Some people just want to be different. Some people like snakes or turtles as pets too. There's a reason dogs and cats are the most popular pets by a huge margin which shrinks the rest to insignificant footnotes--they have more in common with us including our being carnivorous/omnivorous, and a greater ability to express loyalty and affection

Oh I agree Painful that most people prefer cats and dogs. Absolutely true, that. I have a feral cat shelter myself here. People simple dump cats here as I live in the woods and have a barn. I hate the SOBS that do that ****e. One more cat we named Naples, who was taken by a fisher last year had been declawed and had a bad skin issue, which was easily treated by my vet. However, that being said, I was raised on a farm and did have pet pigs. But you are right its mostly cats and dogs.

 

[JoStories]

Hi Folks..

Jo; Hmmm...how to respond to you..??...Rudely worded..??...Hardly - and not more so than your own first post to me here...And how can you even know if it is rudely worded or not -according to you you dot even read it..lol....make your mind up - either you read it,formed an opinion - or you didnt read it and are chatting nonesense here - which is it..??..

Original first hand direct testimony from those who walked and talked with Christ..?...YES - FOR SURE exists !! I dont care about your credentials as a "theologian" - FACT IS - we have ACTUAL MANUSCRIPTS - which DO claim to be DIRECTLY WRITTEN by the disciples THEMSELVES - and which we know for sure DID exist in His time and shortly thereafter,as well - church founders and other historians WROTE about them, so we know for sure its all truth and not some later fabrication (such as the bible canon for example - wholly fabricated FROM these pre existanct texts....

As such a self confessed expert - Im sure you must be familiar with the Nicea council meeting and events as recorded there..?..or as such a self confessed expert - Im equally sure you realise the Catholics themselves fully admit their own bible origins - fully in accord with that which I present..

SHOUTING..?>..Hmmm...Naaa - just laziness on my part - much easier to just hold down shift key and type, rather that click to underline, or bold or italic or whatever - then click back when its not needed..lol...LAZY my friend - that is all - though yes of course - EMPHASIS on certain key words and phrases - designed to make you realise certain truths and to GET YOU ALL THINKING !!

Im not actually trying to convince anyone anything - all about TRUTH and FREE WILL - and so I present CHRISTS truth plainly for all to see - and yes - EVERYTHING I present CAN be backed up by ORIGINAL SCRIPTURE - you know, the stuff the Disciples ACTUALLY claim that they wrote themselves

You may think it "rude" in presentation - but I think it NECASSARY - as well - I - and Christ - now have over 2000years of religious B-S to wade through and push out the way before His LEGITIMATE truth can even be heard again...Rude - would be the church that twisted His truth and gave us lies instead....So inbred now that lies are taken as truth unchallenged - except by me - and those other brave Souls who KNOW Christ and are willing to follow Him truthfully - I willl challenge the lies and hypocrasy always - as well to be honest - He asked me too and He is my mate

Well well...what a ranting post. I did read this entire post and let me say first that that is unusual as I don't generally read long posts. Now, that said, the gospels have no evidence that they were written by the actual disciples. Josephus and Tacitus were written many years after the fact and neither can be used to substantiate that the gospels were written by the disciples. Iranaeus was not written until 180 CE and he did not mention the gospels by name at all, and neither did Justin Martyr which is dated to 150 CE. In fact, none of the manuscripts we have now that are the basis of the Bible are dated to before 125 CE with the exception of Mark, which was alleged to have been written by John Mark, about 80 CE and contains so many errors of Palestinean geography that most scholars state the it was written by someone other than a direct observant. And then there is the disclaimer at the end of Mark the puts the entire book into question. Similar issues exist for all the gospels but in the interest of not being long winded (sic) I will not get into that. You are free to believe whatever you want to. However, that does not mean that what you believe is truth for anyone other than yourself. I am Buddhist and follow the laws of The Buddha. Do I believe that to be 100% truth? No. I admit that it could be nothing more than my own beliefs and wishes. So you are free to continue to prattle on about what you see as truth and try to convince everyone you are correct but you will be met with opposition and rightfully so.

 

[ThePainefulTruth]

First, you are assuming a god, second, why would a god have to have a sex??? Is he going to procreate with Ms. god???????

Exactly. And that's just one of the reasons why there'd only be one God.

But if one reads the Tanahk, or OT, one finds that that God did more than Its share of evil acts. Sodom being just one example of many. Of course, I don't believe that that depiction of God is even close to what is true. Examples abound, such as the alleged Great Flood but again, there is zero evidence of such a thing having happened on this earth.

And of course the Israelite genocide of the Canaanites according at God's supposed commands. But why do you bring any of that up here? It's just more evidence that the biblical god is just a human tool for manipulating other humans.





Oh I agree Painful that most people prefer cats and dogs. Absolutely true, that. I have a feral cat shelter myself here. People simple dump cats here as I live in the woods and have a barn. I hate the SOBS that do that ****e. One more cat we named Naples, who was taken by a fisher last year had been declawed and had a bad skin issue, which was easily treated by my vet. However, that being said, I was raised on a farm and did have pet pigs. But you are right its mostly cats and dogs.[/QUOTE]

 

[The_Fisher_King]

Of course, I don't believe that that depiction of God is even close to what is true. Examples abound, such as the alleged Great Flood but again, there is zero evidence of such a thing having happened on this earth.

The stories of the Great Flood are a memory of the floods that followed the end of the last Ice Age.

 

[ThePainefulTruth]

The stories of the Great Flood are a memory of the floods that followed the end of the last Ice Age.

The best source I've found on the subject is Underworld by Graham Hancock. It's relatively dated (2002), but marine archaeology moves at a snails pace compared to other sciences since very little actual exploration is taking place due to the difficulties associated with the environment in the open ocean and expenses involved. One of the most fascinating possibilities is that the ancient biblical civilization, the Garden of Eden (my name for it), may have been where the Persian Gulf is now. The combined Tigris-Euphrates R. would have flowed through a very likely fertile and warm area during that ice age. But the difficulties are increased by the current pollution there. (When walking on the beaches of Oman when I was stationed there in 1990, your flip-flops would get coated with tar--and that was outside the Gulf on the Arabian Sea.) The most significant finds thus far are 2 underwater "cities" off the coast of India at the mouth of the Indus R. They've been reveled by sonar studies but remain basically unexplored.

Atlantis (again, my name for it) would have been a band of advanced civilizations girding the middle latitudes of Earth on coastlines that are now under up to 400' of water.

 

[Domenic]

Hi Folks..

Domenic; Thank You - and Im very glad Im making you think

Now - this is fun...If there were other gods, then there would be no need to spawn us..??....

Hmm...Ok - so from OUR perspective there are indeed many many gods....Just look at the worlds religions and countless beliefs...Christ though - said that all those we took to be gods, were actually merely ANGELS - creatures like You and I, but not the actual SOURCE or cause of Creation itself...Once He said, before He came among us, this entire realm was seperate and isolated from the TRUE Divine - these Angels and their chief have interacted always with man under many MANY disguises...if any doubt this - then just consider Yahweh himself - who first appears as one traditonal belief to the Jews, then changes its presentation to the "christians2 then abandons all that and presents itself again, differently to the MUSLIMS - one god THREE different "truths"..

That is because all along these SAME ANGELS have been giving us LIMITED wisdom - limited by the fact Christ said, that we are ISOLATED, and none here, not even Angels above, know the entire truth He said...EVERY religion,IS the same Angels here - cannot be any other way if we truly trust Christ...Multiple "gods" DO exist...

Secondly - far more important truth - ALL CREATION flows from the Divine Mind - it literally imagines what it will be - then causes a symbolic form to be created to represent that idea within its own Mind - so that it can perceive and begin to understand its OWN SELF - this search for Self understanding pushes this Primal mind to then DIRECTLY INDWELL the form it has created, and thus it can now DIRECTLY EXPERIENCE the very thing that it first imagined it Self to BE..

Mind will ALWAYS CREATE - this process is the truth of KARMA as we mistakenly know it and Christ said this is a Divine inherant quality that is continuous - creation is continuous - as the drive for Self understanding is itself continuous...This drive is GNOSIS and it is this inherant nature that literally causes Creation of EXTERNAL and solid seeming worlds and the lives therein....In essence - it is all occuring within My Fathers Mind.... For those with ears to hear...

I was referring to the God of the bible. His name is Elohim. It is in the scriptures over 2,700 hundred times. It is a two part word. The first part means, "He," the second part means, "Female."
Noten God said, "Let us make man in our image. Since God is both male, and female It seems he took the women out of the man, and made , and made a female. It would be kind of easy to see why he did not take the female out of the ground like he did Adam?

 

[Aupmanyav]

Sometimes God (or Goddess) forgets to take out the whole of woman from man and whole of man from woman creating problems for religions.

 

[psychoslice]

Male or female what would be the use of he's or her genitals ?.

 

[Aupmanyav]

The stories of the Great Flood are a memory of the floods that followed the end of the last Ice Age.

Or the deluge by snow during the ice-age as mentioned in Zoroastrian Avesta. I have mentioned it many a times.

Male or female what would be the use of he's or her genitals ?.

Perhaps they were crafted later on a smooth crotch. Which means ...

 

[Ingledsva]

...

Also, since women can only have rather than create babies, I'd agree with some of what you said.

...

Actually women today can have babies without male sperm needed. Men cannot have babies without a female.

*

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Actually women today can have babies without male sperm needed. Men cannot have babies without a female.

*

That's why I said have rather than create. I never saw a man get pregnant and have a baby other than on the movie Junior.

 

[Ingledsva]

That's why I said have rather than create. I never saw a man get pregnant and have a baby other than on the movie Junior.

Cloning is very interesting, and has come a long way. A couple of years ago they created a "clone" with two different female's DNA, thus creating a totally different female.

*

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Cloning is very interesting, and has come a long way. A couple of years ago they created a "clone" with two different female's DNA, thus creating a totally different female.

*

To tell you honestly, that's kind of disturbing. I'd say interesting nonetheless.

 

[ThePainefulTruth]

Cloning is very interesting, and has come a long way. A couple of years ago they created a "clone" with two different female's DNA, thus creating a totally different female.

*

So if you did away with men, would the 95% of women who would normally be heterosexual, have a sense of loss? Would the world be a better place? Would the cosmetics industry going out of business be a good thing or a bad? Just asking.

 

[Ingledsva]

So if you did away with men, would the 95% of women who would normally be heterosexual,

Studies have found that the majority of the women they tested, were actually Bi.

have a sense of loss?

Obviously.

Would the world be a better place?

Painful as it is, most likely. There is an old Sci-Fi movie on this very subject. It was very interesting. I wish I could remember the name of the movie.

Would the cosmetics industry going out of business be a good thing or a bad? Just asking.

It would be great. Get rid of that false-advertising crap.

*

 

[ThePainefulTruth]

Studies have found that the majority of the women they tested, were actually Bi.

Really. I do confess that I've never really understood female sexual orientation, but I've always had the feeling that women weren't born homosexual as men apparently are--except maybe for the butch types. Again, I don't know. I think bi-sexual men are into it for the manipulation and control of others.

Obviously.

Why? Most of the women who talk about it seem to have a pretty cavalier attitude about it.

Painful as it is, most likely. There is an old Sci-Fi movie on this very subject. It was very interesting. I wish I could remember the name of the movie.

I think the psyches of women, though initially may have a feeling of liberation, would in the long run be devastated, or at least in a gray world. But it's hard for me to imagine.

It would be great. Get rid of that false-advertising crap.

Yeah, maybe the drudgery of it, but I think you'd miss the competition. Even primitive societies use a variety of appearance enhancement techniques. It gives one an edge over which you have control, and that aspect of it wouldn't be false advertising; rather, an indication of artistic creativity, intelligence and/or industriousness. If beauty were completely in the eye of the beholder, there'd be a lot more women who could dispense with it.

 

[Thief]

Somebody's mad already.

We know that God is Creator, yes? The One who brings forth life. Woman is the only species who can bring forth life, therefore woman is God. Men cannot bring forth life, so God cannot be male.

Somebody's really mad now.

And it's probably a dude.

Well, historically, it was angry men who flipped the whole creation story and made God male, hence the answer to the popular question, "Did God create man or did man create God?" is "BOTH" because the men who changed history into mystery wanted control. They wanted to control women, children what they were taught, grew to believe and pass on to generations until the people of today think these false teachings are fact.

God gave Man dominion

just saying.....