Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Oh..... don't worry about God. God didn't do anything. We need to keep an eye out for mankind!And this might be okay if it wasn't for the fact that god saddled us with sin and suffering in the first place, AND offered a remedy to only some. So your assessment that god doesn't worry about us, particularly is right on: God simply doesn't care, which I can't characterize as okay..
No that's not what I'm saying. The pro-intellectual Christian ignores nothing but is not tied to ancient understandings. That's what I'm saying.And the anti-intellectual wants to desperately ignore the complicating implications of his beliefs so as to remain secure in his faith.
Gotta say, that's a new perspective I've never read before.allfoak said:The gospels are written with him being held up as our example not our savior.
Never was kicking myself.oldbadger said:Oh..... don't worry about God. God didn't do anything. We need to keep an eye out for mankind!
And..... come on...... folks like Hitler and Stalin were not 'God driven'.
My take is that you, yourself, are a very small part of the whole which is God....... so stop kicking yourself. Fair enough?
Oh, okay.George-ananda said:No that's not what I'm saying. The pro-intellectual Christian ignores nothing but is not tied to ancient understandings. That's what I'm saying.
Of course it's convenient. It's right. And it answers the question on the fairness of God and salvation.convenient
Which obviously includes Hell, where millions upon millions of people suffer its fury, including those who had to suffer in agony for thousands of years waiting for Jesus to arrive.
I assume you're not making all this up, but have it on good authority. Care to share your source?
______________________________________________
So if salvation was always chugging along why was Jesus needed?
Before Jesus came onto the scene people were dying left and right without being saved from the wages of their sins. Then when god finally decided to set his plan of salvation into motion it was like molasses running downhill in winter. Only a smattering of those in the mid-east and those in Rome eventually heard about salvation through Jesus (Christianity didn't become the accepted religion in Rome until 300 CE). Slowly, over hundreds of years, people of other lands were introduced to the "message," some not hearing about salvation through Christ until the twentieth century. In the meantime the omnipotent god of Abraham turned a blind eye to the millions upon millions of people who had died and were dying without benefit of the death of his son.
Before Jesus came onto the scene people were dying left and right without being saved from the wages of their sins. Then when god finally decided to set his plan of salvation into motion it was like molasses running downhill in winter. Only a smattering of those in the mid-east and those in Rome eventually heard about salvation through Jesus (Christianity didn't become the accepted religion in Rome until 300 CE). Slowly, over hundreds of years, people of other lands were introduced to the "message," some not hearing about salvation through Christ until the twentieth century. In the meantime the omnipotent god of Abraham turned a blind eye to the millions upon millions of people who had died and were dying without benefit of the death of his son.
So what could have been going on in gods mind? What kind of mind lays misery on an entire species of creatures and then provides a cure that is so confined and works so slowly it only affects a pitiful percentage of them? Were these clueless people somehow undeserving of salvation? Was this some kind of experiment of god's, using the unaware as a control group?
Considering that salvation is such a big deal, to me a decent being would never withhold such a gift. I know of people, myself included, who would never be so merciless. So, I can only conclude that when it comes to the truth of the matter, god simply doesn't care. He eventually threw a bone to his creation and doesn't care who sees it or not.
Of course, if I've missed an important element here, I'm all ears.
How do you know it's right?Of course it's convenient. It's right. And it answers the question on the fairness of God and salvation.
Have you read the gospels?Jesus was the first of humanity to return to the father.
The gospels are written with him being held up as our example not our savior.
Christ is a power not a person.
There is no historical component to salvation.
But I find this severely unlikely: everyone knew they were headed for hell unless "saved." For one thing, I don't believe this "fact" has any veracity, as in, a backed up by a reputable source.Scott C." said:The need for a Savior was known from the foundation of the world.
But it never worked out that way. Certainly those living and dying before Jesus came on the scene couldn't have known. And then consider all those who never had the opportunity to hear of Jesus after he was resurrected. Or heard about him but were never convinced of the need. Their fault or that of the preacher?God's plan is universal. It allows for all people to hear and to accept Christ and his gospel.
So where are they? And even if they aren't in a never ending hell of fire and torture, they also aren't in heaven. Close but no cigar is a sad fate when others are enjoying a Havana Corona in heaven because they were fortunate enough to be in the right place at the right time. Lucky them.Some people knew Christ would come before he arrived. Most did not. People who die without a knowledge of Jesus are not in a never ending hell of fire and torture.
Yup, and so far none of them have dispelled this conclusion. Many have tap danced around the issue, suggesting partial solutions that often contradicted one another, and others that have simply made flat out claims that I'm wrong, and let it go at that. Your conclusion belowWhile it seems you do not believe in Jesus and salvation, you should be able to recognize that there are answers, among believers, to your accusations of the unfairness and meanness of God.
I simply do not accept any of your conclusions in this regard. They are inconsistent with what I believe about the plan of salvation.
Sure I do, and it comes down to a huge contradiction. A contradiction that is deliberately ignored and even dismissed in favor of holding onto the image of a loving, just, and merciful God. It's an "I Cant Hear You" position of belief. So what that god said he created evil, or disaster, or calamity, or whatever,---things humans would be damned for had they done the same---forget that and keep focused on how he has a plan to save us from the sin and suffering he laid upon us all. OOPS, forget about the sin and suffer part and keep focused on your salvation.I get that you don't believe in salvation through Christ, but do you get that you do not understand my views on how it's all consistent with a loving, just, and merciful God?
How do you know it's right?
As a Mormon this is pretty fundamental to our beliefs. It's supported by the Bible certainly. But, it's also made crystal clear in other books that we consider to be scripture. So, when you ask "How do you know it's right?", are you asking me to show you in the Bible and/or in other Mormon scripture? Or, are you asking me one of the most classic religious questions of all time, which is "how do you know there is a God and/or a Savior, and/or that the Bible is true, and/or that other Mormon scripture is true?" I can provide lots of scriptural evidence to answer the first question. I won't try to answer the second, since that's not the point of the thread.
Scott C. First things first. You asked, ". . .do you get that you do not understand my views on how it's all consistent with a loving, just, and merciful God?" Yes, I do not understand. You say....
If this is a link it isn't functioning. In any case what you've presented is very interesting. Quite a departure from standard Christian theology.Here's one example from the Pearl of Great Price that clearly teaches that Adam and Eve knew of Christ, rejoiced in their redemption and taught these things to their children. Ok, I know that it annoys some people when other people quote from their scriptures. But take a moment and read it anyway. You might learn something new.
God taught Adam and Eve about Christ and repentance.
If this is a link it isn't functioning. In any case what you've presented is very interesting. Quite a departure from standard Christian theology.
It gets weirder:If this is a link it isn't functioning. In any case what you've presented is very interesting. Quite a departure from standard Christian theology.
It gets weirder:.