• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gods limitations

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Probably not. Doesn't your god still struggle with how to construct a universe where suffering cannot happen, but people still have free will?
Not in my opinion. Suffering has a unique purpose, it causes a person to focus on what really matters to them.
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
Not in my opinion. Suffering has a unique purpose, it causes a person to focus on what really matters to them.
Your omnipotent omniscient god is incapable of achieving said ends without suffering?
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Try to imagine a world without suffering. What would happen when a person goes without food or water. They wouldn't suffer, they wouldn't get thirsty or hungry. They would dehydrate and die. What about assaults? Why not just punch someone in the face, they wouldn't feel any pain, what's the harm?

Suffering is an important part of reality. The world would be a lesser place without it.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
No, I don't think so. Suffering is the only way.
An omnipotent/omniscient God could have employed another way to accomplish His purpose for humans, but since God didn't employ another way any logical person would realize that suffering was the best way to accomplish His purposes for humans since an all-knowing God would have to know the best way.

Anyone who thinks there could have been a better way than the way God chose is patently illogical because it is logically impossible for any human to know more than an all-knowing God.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Did you check to see how many times this question has been asked over time on the forum? Did you check to see how others have answered the question in the past?
I wonder that so few people see that trying to use a logical impossibility to disprove God fails before it gets off the ground. And using a similar argument to prove God would likewise fail.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
Try to imagine a world without suffering. What would happen when a person goes without food or water. They wouldn't suffer, they wouldn't get thirsty or hungry. They would dehydrate and die.

What about assaults? Why not just punch someone in the face, they wouldn't feel any pain, what's the harm?

Suffering is an important part of reality. The world would be a lesser place without it.

Try to imagine a world where everyone is immortal and no one dies out of starvation, dehydration, or being punched to death. Voila. Problem solved.
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member
An omnipotent/omniscient God could have employed another way to accomplish His purpose for humans, but since God didn't employ another way any logical person would realize that suffering was the best way to accomplish His purposes for humans since an all-knowing God would have to know the best way.

Anyone who thinks there could have been a better way than the way God chose is patently illogical because it is logically impossible for any human to know more than an all-knowing God.

I have never read you stating it this way before, so I feel it is important to touch this point in particular: Whatever are God's purposes for humans doesn't automatically translate into what humans themselves would regard as being in their best interest. And that's not just because we might lack some knowledge, but also because we might have quite distinct goals.

Let me give you an analogy: Imagine we could create a conscious hammer and that such hammer is the only kind of hammer that exists (regular hammers don't exist in this scenario). It suffers whenever we use it to...well... smash stuff with it. It was however purposefully designed to smash stuff, and it serves our best interest to use it that way.... However, smashing stuff with it is not in the conscious hammer's own self-interest. So, what actually matters: The purpose we, the creators, assigned to the hammer or how the hammer itself perceives it's experiences?
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Try to imagine a world where everyone is immortal and no one dies out of starvation, dehydration, or being punched to death. Voila. Problem solved.
God already has this in the realm of angels. Mortals must therefore serve a different purpose.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Try to imagine a world where everyone is immortal and no one dies out of starvation, dehydration, or being punched to death. Voila. Problem solved.
That world is called the spiritual world and that is where we are all headed after we die physically.
It is also known as heaven or paradise.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I have never read you stating it this way before, so I feel it is important to touch this point in particular: Whatever are God's purposes for humans doesn't automatically translate into what humans themselves would regard as being in their best interest.
I know that, but I don't think that humans can know more than God regarding what is actually in their best interest. Some humans might 'believe' they know more than God regarding what is in their best interest, but that is logically impossible, since no human can know more than an all-knowing God.
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
That being...?
To improve in spite of our flaws. If humans were immortal, there would be no incentive to improve. A person could sit and do nothing all day and it would be no different than a person who is productive.
 
Top