Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Such as?Confucius has many problems.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Such as?Confucius has many problems.
He was Chinese so a Marxist, Communist Demoncrat.Such as?
Well the guy doesn't write out solutions and quips of wisdom if he didn't have problems wouldn't he?Such as?
All I see is firm hard ground.
Trump is not planning a theocracy. See Agenda 47, that is his plan. Address that, other wise you are just being untruthful about what Trumps wants to do.Given that he's a habitual liar, is that supposed to mean something?
All it takes is an honest, objective look at the mountain of evidence:
What We Know About Trump’s Link To Project 2025—As Author Claims Ex-President ‘Blessed It’ In Secret Recording
An author of Project 2025 told undercover reporters the ex-president is "very supportive of what we do."www.forbes.comTrump disavows Project 2025, but he has long-standing ties to some key architects
Former President Donald Trump has claimed to know “nothing” about the conservative road map for a second term, but some of his top former advisers are heavily involved with it.www.nbcnews.comLoading…
www.reuters.comWhat is Project 2025? Inside the conservative plan Trump claims to have 'no idea' about.
The Heritage Foundation seeks major changes in the federal government after the election. Many of the plan's authors have a Trump connection.www.usatoday.com
The American people don't want your ****ty little theocracy.
Show me one person charged with insurrection. If you cannot then think why no one was charged with insurrection. 18 US code 2383 has penalties for insurrection and defines what that is. ????He incited an insurrection
The Overton Window is a hell of a drug.Seem's like even the liberals are looking at Harris in a differnt light. In a article in the Washington Post, columnist Catherine Rampell criticized Vice President Harris' proposal to implement federal price controls in order to stop "price gouging" on groceries.
She wrote:
"At best, this would lead to shortages, black markets and hoarding, among other distortions seen previous times countries tried to limit price growth by fiat," Rampell wrote. "(There’s a reason narrower ‘price gouging’ laws that exist in some U.S. states are rarely invoked.) At worst, it might accidentally raise prices."
"But more to the point: If your opponent claims you’re a ‘communist,’ maybe don’t start with an economic agenda that can (accurately) be labeled as federal price controls," she wrote. "We already have plenty of economic gibberish coming from the Republican presidential ticket. Do we really need more from the other side, too?"
Harris' price control proposal risks validating 'communist' label, says liberal Washington Post columnist
Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell criticized Vice President Harris' proposal to implement federal price controls in order to stop “price gouging."www.foxnews.com
Maybe the holiday is coming to an end for Harris when people start looking at her and remembering her failed attempt to run for President.
This is all nonsense. Can you actually be truthful about my positions and what I say. All of my responses to you are just the same: "I never said that" or I have already addressed your comments many times. So go ahead and respond by saying I am scared to respond or have no answers etc. That is your MO.No, you cited the Agenda 47 as going all out on all sources of energy, So why isn't Trump on board? Your posts are a mess.
I never said any such thing, so just a strawman, and not a lie on my part. What we know is that burning fossil fuels causes pollution and greenhouse gases, and this has led to climate change that is more and more problematic for all of us. As weather gets more severe it will cost us more money. Why isn't Trump all in for green energy?
This is more strawman arguments. No one is aiming for 100% renewable energy any time soon.
False, the guy is an exceptional liar. A criminal. A fraudster. He is vastly worse, and you trying to minimize it just shows us your need for denial.
More denial. And look at how you totally ignore my response to your previous comment about something happening to me (and other Trump/MAGA critics). You must have found your subtle threat against me as crossing a line and made you look bad. I've never seen you post a threat to another member, but I suppose you are feeling your back against the wall as Trump makes a fool of himself, and you MAGAs are desperate to mitigate what we all see and known about your criminal candidate. I worry how far you MAGAs will go if Trump loses again, and he lies about it again, and you have to decide whether to he a good citizen and accept the election, or become a traitor and follow Triump's orders, as many did back on Jan 6 of 2021. Your dignity and integrity is your to ruin if you keep following your criminal candidate.
Then you are rare among MAGAs, many who still believe Trump's lie that he won. And you must have ignored the evidence for why he was impeached the second time, and that was his attempt to overthrow the election of 2020.
This is absurd since we all have history on our side. You are in serious denial about this. Trimp was impeached the second time for his actions to overturn the election. He had criminal indictments in DC and Georgia for his acts, and possible in some other states. How you manage to ignore this, or just be exceptional at denial, is beyond me. Try defending your beliefs when we have facts and history that you are wrong. You should even strat a thread if you are confident. But I think you know you are wrong, and have no confidence.
Have you watched any of it? Or just believeing the divisive rhetoric of FOX? Given your false beliefs in the last few comments no wonder you think democrats are lying. You must believe everything your criminal candidate says. And everything your far right wing disinformation media says. I caught about 20 minutes of FOX when I was in a business a few days agai and Guffield and piero were mocking how positive the democrats are. Wow, talk about a bunch of bitter and joyless people who seem aware that Americans are tiring of their negativity, but have nothing else to offer in their performance.
Yeah, because things are so bad in the USA post the Trump presidency. Look at the stock market. And unemployment. And rising income. And economic growth. Now inflation has been a problem for the whole world due to the post pandemic pressures, but Biden did very well in managing it. The republicans in congress have helped to some degree, but as trump has gotten more influence as the criminal candidate the republicans are more interested in sabotaging good legislation, like the border bill. Who is screweing America? It's MAGA. Once the criminal candidate is gone the USA will have one less disease. And republicans will have to figure out wht they stand for without a criminal figurehead.
Sorry, you have false beliefs that you carelessly post, and you seem to be following the bad habits of your criminal candidate. You should know better than to post false claims when you are outnumbered by well informed members.
What are you afraid of, that we won't allow ourselves to be threatened and harmed by MAGAs seeking revenge? My guess is you are projecting because you know that MAGAs already have a history of violence against the USA and you feel shame about it, so impy democrats would do the same thing. You are the poster child for how MAGAs think and believe, and the well informed understand that it's MAGA who poses a threat if their candidate loses. Just look at the false things you believe that facts and history disputes. Truly dangerous. Who knows what you will do if your criminal candidate says his followers need to act against the USA again.
Look at your false rhetoric. There's no basis for your accusations. There's no history of democrats doing this, only MAGAs. Sick indeed.
Is this all you have, more false claims? No evidence? More projection? More denial? Your posts are getting more desperate. Interesting.
Oh, are we still pretending nothing happened on January 6th? It was just a peaceful tour of the Capitol building?Show me one person charged with insurrection. If you cannot then think why no one was charged with insurrection. 18 US code 2383 has penalties for insurrection and defines what that is. ????
I never said nothing happened on Jan 6th. I said an insurrection did not happen.Oh, are we still pretending nothing happened on January 6th? It was just a peaceful tour of the Capitol building?
Are we still pretending that Trump and his team didn't have a whole scheme laid out to remain the President, despite the fact that he lost?
And they should be punished for that.Several people have been found guilty of seditious conspiracy. Not good enough for you though, right?
There's an old Vulcan saying: "only Nixon can go to China."Well, he hobnobbed and partied with Communists like Mao and Brezhnev, even if he may not have been a Communist himself. As the song goes, "If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow." I'll bet Nixon had pictures of Chairman Mao. Nixon liked to talk to pictures.
Is this some hair-splitting between "coup attempt" and "insurrection"?I never said nothing happened on Jan 6th. I said an insurrection did not happen.
Oh, that's good! A great example of "spin."Maybe more like corporate media doing what corporate media does.
The New York Times Pitchbot is satire, for anyone unfamiliar with it.
View attachment 95990
Now it's a coup attempt? Has anyone or Trump been charged with insurrection? The answer is no.Is this some hair-splitting between "coup attempt" and "insurrection"?
Now it's a coup attempt?
Has anyone or Trump been charged with insurrection? The answer is no.
You definitely seem to be downplaying it quite a bit. What would you call it then?I never said nothing happened on Jan 6th. I said an insurrection did not happen.
They have been.And they should be punished for that.
That isn't really knowable.Trump is not planning a theocracy.
How did Trump orchestrate this?Which of the following points do you disagree with?
- Before January 6, Trump and his close advisors arranged for fake "electors" with fraudulent certificates of ascertainment, with the intent of getting them to replace the legitimate electors and certificates from the affected states. These fake electors represented enough EC votes to sway the outcome of the election.
He never incited a mob. He said protested peacefully.
- On January 6, Trump incited a mob of people to delay the counting of EC votes with the hope that this would buy time to persuade Pence - in charge of the counting process as per applicable law - to participate.
Who tried to kill Pence? Where is this plot verified? This is ridiculous.
- When Pence refused to participate, news was spread to the mob, who then tried to locate Pence and kill him so that, by process in the 25th Amendment, Trump could appoint a new VP who would accept the fraudulent electors/certificates.
What plan? Show me Trump orchestrated a plan. Trump questioned the results of the election which he is free to do, he said for people to protest peacefully, and he left office. He asked Pence to stop the counting because of the irregularities in some states to get that sorted out, Pence refused and Trump did not kill him.... because that's a coup attempt.
- The plan was thwarted when police regained control of the Capitol, the mob was stopped, and the EC vote count was able to be completed.
A mob.You definitely seem to be downplaying it quite a bit. What would you call it then?
good.They have been.
Who tried to kill Pence? Where is this plot verified?
Indeed. The denial & low information ofThis is ridiculous.