• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Harris Called Out For Being A Communist

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
How did Trump orchestrate this?

He never incited a mob. He said protested peacefully.

Who tried to kill Pence? Where is this plot verified? This is ridiculous.

What plan? Show me Trump orchestrated a plan. Trump questioned the results of the election which he is free to do, he said for people to protest peacefully, and he left office. He asked Pence to stop the counting because of the irregularities in some states to get that sorted out, Pence refused and Trump did not kill him.
I know these questions you've asked have all been answered for you before, and in great detail. Trump is under indictment for a reason, you know.
Why would you feign ignorance at this point?
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
That isn't really knowable.
There's some evidence he's heading in that direction....
- Planting anti-abortion Christians on SCOTUS.
You mean nominated and confirmed through the constitutional process.
- JD Vance as Veep.
yeah he is a christian. so what?
- Telling Christians that if he wins, they'll never need to vote again.
yeah, in context it makes sense what he said but no matter you don;t care.
- Encouraging the belief that he's chosen & protected by God.
Uh huh.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member

Indeed. The denial & low information of
Trump supporters is startlingly outrageous.
How was trump involved with that? That was the question I was asked and responded to. That Trump somehow tried to kill Pence.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
You mean nominated and confirmed through the constitutional process.

yeah he is a christian. so what?

yeah, in context it makes sense what he said but no matter you don;t care.
How does it make sense "in context." Please elaborate.

 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
How did Trump orchestrate this?

He never incited a mob. He said protested peacefully.

Who tried to kill Pence? Where is this plot verified? This is ridiculous.

What plan? Show me Trump orchestrated a plan. Trump questioned the results of the election which he is free to do, he said for people to protest peacefully, and he left office. He asked Pence to stop the counting because of the irregularities in some states to get that sorted out, Pence refused and Trump did not kill him.


Before all of your questions can be answered you need to correct one false statement that you made. Yes, one time, and one time only did Trump say to protest peacefully. But again and again he lied to the crowd and stated that he won, that the election was rigged. And more than once he urged the crowd to "fight like hell". When one's exhortations for violence greatly outnumber one weak plea for "protesting peacefully" you cannot say that he did not urge on the crowd to riot.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
How was trump involved with that? That was the question I was asked and responded to. That Trump somehow tried to kill Pence.

"Asked whether he condemned white supremacists and military groups, Mr. Trump demurred and then said, “Proud Boys — stand back and stand by.”

Within minutes, members of the group were posting in private social media channels, calling the president’s comments “historic.” In one channel dedicated to the Proud Boys on Telegram, a private messaging app, group members called the president’s comment a tacit endorsement of their violent tactics.

In another message, a member commented that the group was already seeing a spike in “new recruits.”



"White House officials described a tweet from then-President Donald Trump as a breaking point that prompted some to decide to resign.
Mr. Trump tweeted at 2:24 p.m., after the riot was under way: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done.” That was a reference to the vice president’s refusal to block the certification of President Biden’s election win in the joint session of Congress that day.
“The tweet looked to me like the opposite of what we really needed at that moment, which was a deescalation,” Matt Pottinger, Mr. Trump’s former deputy national security adviser, told the committee.

Sarah Matthews, a former White House deputy press secretary, argued that the tweet gave Mr. Trump’s supporters permission to continue their assault on the U.S. Capitol. “It was essentially him giving the green light to these people,” she said, adding that Mr. Trump’s supporters “truly latch on to every tweet and every word he says.”

Both Mr. Pottinger and Ms. Mathews said the tweet prompted them to decide to step down.

The committee played testimony of other officials' reactions to the tweet. “That's a terrible tweet. And I disagreed with the sentiment, and I thought it was wrong,” said former White House counsel Pat Cipollone.

Former press aide Judd Deere said the tweet was “extremely unhelpful. … The scenes at the U.S. Capitol were only getting worse at that point. This was not going to help that.”



“President Trump was wrong,” Pence said during remarks at the annual white-tie Gridiron Dinner attended by politicians and journalists. “I had no right to overturn the election. And his reckless words endangered my family and everyone at the Capitol that day, and I know history will hold Donald Trump accountable.”
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member

"Asked whether he condemned white supremacists and military groups, Mr. Trump demurred and then said, “Proud Boys — stand back and stand by.”

Within minutes, members of the group were posting in private social media channels, calling the president’s comments “historic.” In one channel dedicated to the Proud Boys on Telegram, a private messaging app, group members called the president’s comment a tacit endorsement of their violent tactics.

In another message, a member commented that the group was already seeing a spike in “new recruits.”



"White House officials described a tweet from then-President Donald Trump as a breaking point that prompted some to decide to resign.
Mr. Trump tweeted at 2:24 p.m., after the riot was under way: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done.” That was a reference to the vice president’s refusal to block the certification of President Biden’s election win in the joint session of Congress that day.
“The tweet looked to me like the opposite of what we really needed at that moment, which was a deescalation,” Matt Pottinger, Mr. Trump’s former deputy national security adviser, told the committee.

Sarah Matthews, a former White House deputy press secretary, argued that the tweet gave Mr. Trump’s supporters permission to continue their assault on the U.S. Capitol. “It was essentially him giving the green light to these people,” she said, adding that Mr. Trump’s supporters “truly latch on to every tweet and every word he says.”

Both Mr. Pottinger and Ms. Mathews said the tweet prompted them to decide to step down.

The committee played testimony of other officials' reactions to the tweet. “That's a terrible tweet. And I disagreed with the sentiment, and I thought it was wrong,” said former White House counsel Pat Cipollone.

Former press aide Judd Deere said the tweet was “extremely unhelpful. … The scenes at the U.S. Capitol were only getting worse at that point. This was not going to help that.”



“President Trump was wrong,” Pence said during remarks at the annual white-tie Gridiron Dinner attended by politicians and journalists. “I had no right to overturn the election. And his reckless words endangered my family and everyone at the Capitol that day, and I know history will hold Donald Trump accountable.”
How is this telling them to kill pence?
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
How is this telling them to kill pence?
There's a reason I provided more than one article, about more than one specific thing. There is more than one specific event or action involved here. It's a collection of actions and events over a period of time. Just like how the failed coup played out.
Follow along, instead of picking out one article and missing the forest for the trees. ;)
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Before all of your questions can be answered you need to correct one false statement that you made. Yes, one time, and one time only did Trump say to protest peacefully. But again and again he lied to the crowd and stated that he won, that the election was rigged. And more than once he urged the crowd to "fight like hell". When one's exhortations for violence greatly outnumber one weak plea for "protesting peacefully" you cannot say that he did not urge on the crowd to riot.
My statement was not false. He said to march peacefully and he never told them to riot or enter the building. He has every right to claim the election was not fair, many politicians including Harris have said to fight and questioned election results. Harris said "When we fight we win". I guess she is saying she want her supporters to riot and enter the capitol :rolleyes:.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
My statement was not false. He said to march peacefully and he never told them to riot or enter the building. He has every right to claim the election was not fair, many politicians including Harris have said to fight and questioned election results. Harris said "When we fight we win". I guess she is saying she want her supporters to riot and enter the capitol :rolleyes:.
It was false. You tried to deny the fact that Trump urged on a crowd to riot. You seem to be just like a creationist in your thought patterns. You cannot take in the whole picture. You focus on only tiny points of it. Just as creationists cannot understand that evolution is not use "natural selection" or "random variation" but a combination of those and other factors you cannot see that Trump urged his followers to attack the Capitol. Context matters, and you are avoiding the context.
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
Read the post above yours. It was posted roughly a half hour before you asked to see the details. One thing to take away is that Harris's "plan" isn't a legislative proposal and is intentionally vague--like Trump's economic "plan". Neither candidate is going to propose detailed legislation, but the public still wants to know what their priorities will be. How do they plan to affect the daily lives of citizens, especially when it comes to family and individual economics?

One thing should be clear about Donald Trump. He does not have an economic plan. What he has is the traditional Republican strategy of trickle down economics--making rich people and corporations richer by cutting taxes on them, transferring the burden to lower income brackets, and doing away with government regulation of businesses. The effect is supposed to be that the increased wealth of individuals and corporations will trickle down to enrich ordinary citizens. This strategy has never worked, but it has led to a growing discrepancy in wealth between the rich and the poor. The lower and middle classes have suffered greatly under that approach

Harris is following the Democratic playbook of taxing wealthy individuals and corporations to grow the economic well-being of ordinary people. That means lowering costs for essentials such as health care, food, other consumer goods, and housing. Her intention to ban price gouging, especially in the food sector, lacks detail on how it will be implemented, but it tells us where she intends to attack the problem--targeting the large grocery chains whose profits have risen dramatically while people have struggled the most to find food products at affordable prices. The danger that many economists see there is that it could succeed in bringing about shortages, depending on how it is implemented. I think that Harris and her advisors will keep that danger in mind as they develop their proposals. If they don't, then she will probably end up being a one-term president. If the price of eggs is going up because of bird flu, then there is little she can do about that. If it is going up because a small number of producers and distributors can charge the maximum that the market will bear, then there are a variety of methods the government can use to combat that problem. Price controls aren't the only method.
Large grocery store chains have very small profit margins. For example Kroger, which is the largest in the USA had a profit margin of 1.4%. Apple had 22% profit. There no room to trim when it comes to grocery stores, unless the goal is drive them into bankruptcy. Harris is clueless. A grocery store has thousand of items from hundreds of venders, and there are many layers of middle men, from farm to grocery shell for each item. Any place you price fix, can gum up all the works. We do not need an emotional thinker, tinkering with the economy, since that is why we are in this mess. Keep Harris away from the economy since she is clueless and panders to the clueless.

Trump idea begins with getting the price of oil to drop by drilling and increasing supply. The opposite action by the DNC has led to the mess we are in. The more oil supply we have, the lower the price. Every step of every product, from farm to grocery shelf, uses oil in same shape or form, such as to make electricity or run a tractor or delivery truck. With oil cheaper, everything comes down a little at each spot, until the consumer feels the price decrease. The consumer also saves money if gas and electricity go down, so they have more money to spend on lower prices, which then makes new business want to open and compete which increases supply, price falls even more and wage increase due to more need for employees.

That one action of lower gas prices is a positive trigger for prices to come down. Lowering regulation is also useful. There are many Agencies that are corrupt and compromised adding to the cost of business. As an example, there was a Supreme Court case, connect to the rise in sea food prices. A somewhat new regulation required all fishermen boat owners pay to have an EPA agent on board to over see their fishing. The boat owner is forced to pay the DEI salary for another employee who did not work, which increases their cost, due to the extortion. The fisherman won their case. Some agencies use law fare against political opponents which does not help anyone but themselves.

Another Supreme court case challenged the authority of any agency to make laws, since only Congress can do that. The agencies has made laws for their own growth; red tape for unions to add more employees, and not the best interests of the American people. Government is very often the source of many economic problems.
 

Regiomontanus

Eastern Orthodox
Large grocery store chains have very small profit margins. For example Kroger, which is the largest in the USA had a profit margin of 1.4%. Apple had 22% profit. There no room to trim when it comes to grocery stores, unless the goal is drive them into bankruptcy. Harris is clueless. A grocery store has thousand of items from hundreds of venders, and there are many layers of middle men, from farm to grocery shell for each item. Any place you price fix, can gum up all the works. We do not need an emotional thinker, tinkering with the economy, since that is why we are in this mess. Keep Harris away from the economy since she is clueless and panders to the clueless.

Trump idea begins with getting the price of oil to drop by drilling and increasing supply. The opposite action by the DNC has led to the mess we are in. The more oil supply we have, the lower the price. Every step of every product, from farm to grocery shelf, uses oil in same shape or form, such as to make electricity or run a tractor or delivery truck. With oil cheaper, everything comes down a little at each spot, until the consumer feels the price decrease. The consumer also saves money if gas and electricity go down, so they have more money to spend on lower prices, which then makes new business want to open and compete which increases supply, price falls even more and wage increase due to more need for employees.

That one action of lower gas prices is a positive trigger for prices to come down. Lowering regulation is also useful. There are many Agencies that are corrupt and compromised adding to the cost of business. As an example, there was a Supreme Court case, connect to the rise in sea food prices. A somewhat new regulation required all fishermen boat owners pay to have an EPA agent on board to over see their fishing. The boat owner is forced to pay the DEI salary for another employee who did not work, which increases their cost, due to the extortion. The fisherman won their case. Some agencies use law fare against political opponents which does not help anyone but themselves.

Another Supreme court case challenged the authority of any agency to make laws, since only Congress can do that. The agencies has made laws for their own growth; red tape for unions to add more employees, and not the best interests of the American people. Government is very often the source of many economic problems.


"The opposite action by the DNC has led to the mess we are in."

You do realize that oil output today is at a record high, at a level higher than when Trump was in office?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
This is all nonsense. Can you actually be truthful about my positions and what I say.
Oddly you offer no corrections or rebuttals. So maybe you’re just horrified to read what your political position is.

All of my responses to you are just the same: "I never said that" or I have already addressed your comments many times. So go ahead and respond by saying I am scared to respond or have no answers etc. That is your MO.
You’re a MAGA and you seem embarrassed or in denial that you believe what is represented in your posts. You nit pick about what the Jan 6 criminals are categorized as, but don’t seem terribly concerned about what they did, or that Trump was the cause for it all.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Now it's a coup attempt? Has anyone or Trump been charged with insurrection? The answer is no.
He was just reindicted for that yesterday. Don't you follow the news at all? He was indicted for it a couple of years ago. The bogus USSC finding that he had "immunity for official acts" cause them to run another grand jury and reindict him on the same changes taking that into account. Now the indictment makes it clear why what he has been charged with were not official acts as President.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Large grocery store chains have very small profit margins. For example Kroger, which is the largest in the USA had a profit margin of 1.4%. Apple had 22% profit. There no room to trim when it comes to grocery stores, unless the goal is drive them into bankruptcy. Harris is clueless. A grocery store has thousand of items from hundreds of venders, and there are many layers of middle men, from farm to grocery shell for each item. Any place you price fix, can gum up all the works. We do not need an emotional thinker, tinkering with the economy, since that is why we are in this mess. Keep Harris away from the economy since she is clueless and panders to the clueless.

Trump idea begins with getting the price of oil to drop by drilling and increasing supply. The opposite action by the DNC has led to the mess we are in. The more oil supply we have, the lower the price. Every step of every product, from farm to grocery shelf, uses oil in same shape or form, such as to make electricity or run a tractor or delivery truck. With oil cheaper, everything comes down a little at each spot, until the consumer feels the price decrease. The consumer also saves money if gas and electricity go down, so they have more money to spend on lower prices, which then makes new business want to open and compete which increases supply, price falls even more and wage increase due to more need for employees.

That one action of lower gas prices is a positive trigger for prices to come down. Lowering regulation is also useful. There are many Agencies that are corrupt and compromised adding to the cost of business. As an example, there was a Supreme Court case, connect to the rise in sea food prices. A somewhat new regulation required all fishermen boat owners pay to have an EPA agent on board to over see their fishing. The boat owner is forced to pay the DEI salary for another employee who did not work, which increases their cost, due to the extortion. The fisherman won their case. Some agencies use law fare against political opponents which does not help anyone but themselves.

Another Supreme court case challenged the authority of any agency to make laws, since only Congress can do that. The agencies has made laws for their own growth; red tape for unions to add more employees, and not the best interests of the American people. Government is very often the source of many economic problems.
MAGAs live in fantasy land.

 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
How did Trump orchestrate this?

He didn't orchestrate it. Kenneth Chesebro did. Trump's role was to approve the plan.

But just so we're clear: the fake elector scheme was a coup attempt all on its own, even without the violence of Jan. 6. Do I understand you correctly: that you don't dispute that the fake elector scam happened, but you question Trump's involvement?

He never incited a mob. He said protested peacefully.
More hair-splitting?

He encouraged the mob to disrupt and delay the EC vote. At that stage of the plan, that's all he hoped he needed.


Who tried to kill Pence? Where is this plot verified? This is ridiculous.

Sounds like you've blocked out your memory of the mobs roaming the Capitol shouting "hang Mike Pence!" as they went from room to room looking for him.

If you want more specifics, members of the Proud Boys have specifically said that their goal was to kill Pence.

What plan? Show me Trump orchestrated a plan.

I didn't say he orchestrated a plan. He approved the plans and committed certain key acts, but it was others in his inner circle who were managing the details (with his blessing).

Trump questioned the results of the election which he is free to do, he said for people to protest peacefully, and he left office. He asked Pence to stop the counting because of the irregularities in some states to get that sorted out, Pence refused and Trump did not kill him.
Do you want me to respond as if you meant this sincerely?
 
Top