firedragon
Veteran Member
).
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Have you read your holy book
- Thread starter ChristineM
- Start date
).
paradox
(㇏(•̀ᵥᵥ•́)ノ)
what is "ahadith"?
firedragon
Veteran Member
That's the plural of Hadith.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Have you read your holy book cover to cover
I observe that the "nones"/Atheists-Agnostics-Skeptics mention about reading Holy Books of other religions, but they don't mention their own. Do all of them follow their "unholy" ones?
for instance.
Regards
I observe that the "nones"/Atheists-Agnostics-Skeptics mention about reading Holy Books of other religions, but they don't mention their own. Do all of them follow their "unholy" ones?
" their "unholy" ones"
for instance.
Regards
Everyone follows some wind that takes them to some place, perspective and understanding, I'd rather be taken by the winds while on the ship of salvation, for those sailing and anchoring expressed "by the name of God is it's sailing and anchoring". The Holy Captains and the holy book that is known as the Quran sail us to beautiful and high places, if we let them.
The winds that are the name of God are the best winds.
firedragon
Veteran Member
Absolutely irrelevant.
He's explaining the word hadith includes Quran (Quran is also a hadith but from God through Gabriel (mostly, some of it directly to) Mohammad (s) to humanity)
firedragon
Veteran Member
But that's still irrelevant. Because you know what we were talking about. If the Quran and the etymology of "hadith" is the subject, then the Qur'an says not to engage in lahwal hadith, and that the Quran is the ahsanul hadith, and in that case the so called 100 books and collections of ahadith becomes irrelevant.
So this is just irrelevant.
It's the best speech and narration, but Messengers speech is quoted in it often paraphrased and contextualized by God in the best way, but Quran calls to the words of the Messengers. Their speech compliments their holy books. After, all, Quran didn't just come down from the sky. It came through Mohammad (s) for a reason.
firedragon
Veteran Member
Exactly what I said. There is no need to repeat what we all know while missing the whole point of the whole discussion of making absolutely bogus claims about people should have read "most of the ahadith" while absolutely have not. It's hypocritical, and now with this irrelevant trail of posts, its just redundant.
Cheers.
Sure, it is hypocritical. I give you that, so let's end it that. May God forgive us and help us learn from the legacy of his chosen guides.
firedragon
Veteran Member
Thats a whole different topic.
Although there are no holy books on atheism there are books, many books, and yes i have read some of them, not all though
Blasphemy on the Dawkins. Joking.
Dawkins is not atheist. By his own words he is agnostic, (he is not 100% sure god does not exist") but religious people insist on calling him atheist.
Secret Chief
Degrow!
Well it would help if the first paragraph of the Wiki entry didn't say:
"Richard Dawkins FRS FRSL (born 26 March 1941) is a British evolutionary biologist and author. He is an emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford and was Professor for Public Understanding of Science in the University of Oxford from 1995 to 2008. An atheist, he is well known for his criticism of creationism and intelligent design."
and further down...
"Dawkins has said he is a 6.9, which represents a "de facto atheist" "
- Richard Dawkins - Wikipedia
Yes, precisely why i prefer the words of the man himself rather than some anonymous wiki.
Last edited:
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Which one of them is the most unholy and unreasonable, please?
A must read for all the "nones" to read and follow. Right?
Regards
None, they are all reasonable but they have no holes in them (usually)
Here are a few, though i wouldn't recommend them all
30 Books Every Atheist Should Read | She Seeks Nonfiction