firedragon
Veteran Member
Brother, it won't take that long.
).
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Brother, it won't take that long.
what is "ahadith"?How many ahadith are there existing today? Have you counted?
what is "ahadith"?
" their "unholy" ones"Yes!
Have you read your holy book cover to cover
I observe that the "nones"/Atheists-Agnostics-Skeptics mention about reading Holy Books of other religions, but they don't mention their own. Do all of them follow their "unholy" ones?
" their "unholy" ones"
for instance.
Regards
For Hadith one must ponder the Quran about it:
45:7
تِلۡکَ اٰیٰتُ اللّٰہِ نَتۡلُوۡہَا عَلَیۡکَ بِالۡحَقِّ ۚ فَبِاَیِّ حَدِیۡثٍۭ بَعۡدَ اللّٰہِ وَاٰیٰتِہٖ یُؤۡمِنُوۡنَ ﴿۷﴾
These are the Signs of Allah which We rehearse unto thee with truth. In what word, then, after rejecting that of Allah and His Signs will they believe?
Holy Quran: Read, Listen and Search
Regards
Absolutely irrelevant.
He's explaining the word hadith includes Quran (Quran is also a hadith but from God through Gabriel (mostly, some of it directly to) Mohammad (s) to humanity)
But that's still irrelevant. Because you know what we were talking about. If the Quran and the etymology of "hadith" is the subject, then the Qur'an says not to engage in lahwal hadith, and that the Quran is the ahsanul hadith, and in that case the so called 100 books and collections of ahadith becomes irrelevant.
So this is just irrelevant.
It's the best speech and narration
Exactly what I said. There is no need to repeat what we all know while missing the whole point of the whole discussion of making absolutely bogus claims about people should have read "most of the ahadith" while absolutely have not. It's hypocritical, and now with this irrelevant trail of posts, its just redundant.
Cheers.
paarsurrey said: ↑
For Hadith one must ponder the Quran about it:
45:7
تِلۡکَ اٰیٰتُ اللّٰہِ نَتۡلُوۡہَا عَلَیۡکَ بِالۡحَقِّ ۚ فَبِاَیِّ حَدِیۡثٍۭ بَعۡدَ اللّٰہِ وَاٰیٰتِہٖ یُؤۡمِنُوۡنَ ﴿۷﴾
These are the Signs of Allah which We rehearse unto thee with truth. In what word, then, after rejecting that of Allah and His Signs will they believe?
Holy Quran: Read, Listen and Search
I am just saying that Hadith is to be understood/interpreted within the purview of some Quranic verse/s and not the vice versa.
Regards
Have you read your holy book cover to cover
I observe that the "nones"/Atheists-Agnostics-Skeptics mention about reading Holy Books of other religions, but they don't mention their own. Do all of them follow their "unholy" ones?
" their "unholy" ones"
for instance.
Regards
Although there are no holy books on atheism there are books, many books, and yes i have read some of them, not all though
Blasphemy on the Dawkins. Joking.
Dawkins is not atheist. By his own words he is agnostic, (he is not 100% sure god does not exist") but religious people insist on calling him atheist.
Well it would help if the first paragraph of the Wiki entry didn't say:
"Richard Dawkins FRS FRSL (born 26 March 1941) is a British evolutionary biologist and author. He is an emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford and was Professor for Public Understanding of Science in the University of Oxford from 1995 to 2008. An atheist, he is well known for his criticism of creationism and intelligent design."
and further down...
"Dawkins has said he is a 6.9, which represents a "de facto atheist" "
- Richard Dawkins - Wikipedia
Which one of them is the most unholy and unreasonable, please?Although there are no holy books on atheism there are books, many books, and yes i have read some of them, not all though
Which one of them is the most unholy and unreasonable, please?
A must read for all the "nones" to read and follow. Right?
Regards