The Voice of Reason
Doctor of Thinkology
Yes, but someone who reads can correctly spell, having seen a variety of correctly spelled words for 30 minutes each day.
Well, you would certainly think so, wouldn't you?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, but someone who reads can correctly spell, having seen a variety of correctly spelled words for 30 minutes each day.
I think he was a political genius. That doesn't mean he was morally enlightened, though.
I think people are (mistakenly) assuming that "genius" means expertise in all areas. The way I see it, it's merely an acknowledgement of exceptional expertise in one field, which Hitler undeniably had.
I think he was a political genius.
No doubt, that's why he so ingenuously aligned so many nations against Germany.
In actuality, his failure to turn the Ukraine against the Soviet Union should even by itself tell us something about Hitler's alleged political genius.
Actually, I'd say it's more how he aligned so many people for his cause.
Yes, and what it tells us is that he wasn't a miracle worker.
First of all, I doubt he had any balls therefore he was not a genius. He was a racist, homophobic scumbag.
He did not align enough to succeed. That should tell you something.
You seem to be under the impression that it would have been difficult for him to align the Ukraine with the Nazi cause. Better check your facts. It would have been easy to do it at the time Germany invade the Soviet Union. Hitler refused the opportunity he had there because he was considerably less than a genius. Again, check your facts before you grossly assume he would have needed to be a miracle worker.
This is the strangest invocation of 'Godwin's law' of all time.
Hitler had the balls to go for it, but not the wits to see it through. It is what it is.
First of all, I doubt he had any balls therefore he was not a genius. He was a racist, homophobic scumbag.
What we're talking about is what Hitler was able to accomplish, and what he was able to accomplish qualifies him as a genius.
All he was able to accomplish was the destruction of a great nation. If you honestly think that makes him a genius, MBall, then you and I are just not going to see eye to eye on this. I will never believe failure is a mark of genius.
All he was able to accomplish was the destruction of a great nation. If you honestly think that makes him a genius, MBall, then you and I are just not going to see eye to eye on this. I will never believe failure is a mark of genius.
I agree the total destruction of you country for decades after with millions dead is not the greatest of legacies for a so called "genius".
Whether or not it's a great legacy is not at issue. Whether or not it takes a genius to accomplish is what's at issue. You can be a genius and leave an awful legacy.