Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
This thread is misleading. Either you are for religious diversity or you're not. It's not "we bring the truth but you can keep your traditions as long as they are up-to-date and they don't cause wars." That's silly.
There is no Bahaullah in the remedy of this age in any faith but the Bahai faith. Every other faith has their own remedy and need to be respected as such.
The Real image is very inappropriate for all religions you listed. This is your belief but the fact these religions don't coincide with each other is so black and white that I think Bahais are the only ones who don't see it. Even Christians see it regardless of how much they want people to come to christ.
Exactly. Remember, you said these were outside expressions. You also said that outward and inward are separated. You even went so far as to say why do you need permission from other faiths to have them a part of yours when god is above all and their opinions don't count (my wording since it will take me forever to find the post).
Which is it? Do you want religions to have their own faith-including Buddhism which has no god-or do you wan to redefine these religions so their god matches the god of Bahai?
Also, remember, the god of Bahai is not the god of Hinduism.
Either you want to abandon previous traditions for those laws relevant for this day and age or you want other religions to keep their traditions because to them, they are relevant for this day and age-the past, present, and future.
Also, if a Christian, Hindu, and Muslim are telling you Bahaullah has no place in their faith in regards to interpretation of prophecies of it other than Christ or Muhammad (and Hindu, again, is completely off the grid), why won't you listen to them and take their objects as truth of their religion not go off the interpretations of yours? They are giving you facts. You are giving us interpretation of their facts. Why not believe the believers not the people who interpret for them?
Yes, my great aunt sara used to use oil lamps and candles. She felt she wanted to live closer to jesus day. There wasn't any cell phones and internet back then. What is wrong with that? She lived to a good age, in a healthy faith, with a huge family. She and many religions and religious like to keep their old traditions and pass them on.
"but who cannot see the overwhelming advantage of electric light" again, respect people for their differences and their truths. It is not wrong. It may be foreign to but to change that as if that will unite people will only bring wars instead.
It is for all the reasons I said above. Many people want to keep the candle because it's been like that for them for ages and it will not cease. You can believe in a modern religion but to unite others who do not see the way you do under a foundation they don't believe in is just, wrong.
Bahai teachings are one of many advantages to end suffering. Each religion has their view. Bahai are no different.
Rhetorical question? We don't need one faith. Diversity is a blessing not a curse.
I don't think you understand what diversity means if you want them to be under one faith.
When they become one faith, their cultures and traditions are destroyed because you have place Bahaullah and god as the foundation where in your revealed religions, the god of Bahaullah and Bahallauh himself has no role as a person nor as a promised one. The sooner you understand this the better.
Bahai Christians, Bahai Hindu, Bahai Muslims, etc have different foundations than Christians, Hindu, and Muslims. The former has Bahaullah as their foundation as the last prophet for this age. The latter three religions do not.
Bahai Christian is not the same as a Christian.
A Bahai Christian would believe Bahaullah is the promised one found in the bible with whom, like christ, has the spirit of god (however you phrased in posts back when I asked was Bahaullah like christ's relationship with god in mainstream christianity), and is a universalist.
Christianity believes in only one god and only one savior/promised one. They do not believe the divinity of other religious prophets have the same divinity as that of christ (whether or not he is god is besides the point). They won't recognize Bahaullah as any manifestation of god. That's insulting Christians and the Jews.
The sooner you understand this the better.
This is a topic of great concern to many and rightfully so. What will happen to diversity of culture, tradition and custom if we have only One Universal Cause, One Common Faith, which is the remedy Bahaullah has prescribed for this age?
There is no Bahaullah in the remedy of this age in any faith but the Bahai faith. Every other faith has their own remedy and need to be respected as such.
The Real image is very inappropriate for all religions you listed. This is your belief but the fact these religions don't coincide with each other is so black and white that I think Bahais are the only ones who don't see it. Even Christians see it regardless of how much they want people to come to christ.
If everyone were to become a Bahá'í, would it mean there be no more church services, no more Buddhist chants, or puja offered to Shiva? Would there be no more Christmas, Divali or Passover?
Exactly. Remember, you said these were outside expressions. You also said that outward and inward are separated. You even went so far as to say why do you need permission from other faiths to have them a part of yours when god is above all and their opinions don't count (my wording since it will take me forever to find the post).
Which is it? Do you want religions to have their own faith-including Buddhism which has no god-or do you wan to redefine these religions so their god matches the god of Bahai?
Also, remember, the god of Bahai is not the god of Hinduism.
With the acceptance of Baha'u'llah it does not mean the abandonment of the basic foundation of ones previous Faith but a new and much deeper appreciation of its truths and added to that laws which are relevant for this day and age. It would mean for most, the fulfillment of the prophecies of their own Faith.
Either you want to abandon previous traditions for those laws relevant for this day and age or you want other religions to keep their traditions because to them, they are relevant for this day and age-the past, present, and future.
Also, if a Christian, Hindu, and Muslim are telling you Bahaullah has no place in their faith in regards to interpretation of prophecies of it other than Christ or Muhammad (and Hindu, again, is completely off the grid), why won't you listen to them and take their objects as truth of their religion not go off the interpretations of yours? They are giving you facts. You are giving us interpretation of their facts. Why not believe the believers not the people who interpret for them?
Whereas in past ages we used oil lamps and candles, electricity is not seen as an affront or insult to previous uses of light but a greater endowment of it. One can still use candles and oil lamps but who cannot see the overwhelming advantage of electric light?
Yes, my great aunt sara used to use oil lamps and candles. She felt she wanted to live closer to jesus day. There wasn't any cell phones and internet back then. What is wrong with that? She lived to a good age, in a healthy faith, with a huge family. She and many religions and religious like to keep their old traditions and pass them on.
"but who cannot see the overwhelming advantage of electric light" again, respect people for their differences and their truths. It is not wrong. It may be foreign to but to change that as if that will unite people will only bring wars instead.
So too with the Baha'i Revelation. It's not in competition with the past religions a massive improvement upon them which we believe all people will embrace as seamlessly as they moved from the candle to electric lighting.
It is for all the reasons I said above. Many people want to keep the candle because it's been like that for them for ages and it will not cease. You can believe in a modern religion but to unite others who do not see the way you do under a foundation they don't believe in is just, wrong.
The Baha'i Teachings are an advantage to those suffering racial discrimination, an advantage to women who have been treated unequally for thousands of years, as a uniting factor replacing nationalism with a global village where people are no longer valued or devalued by their religion, race, culture or nationality but all receive equal rights. Extremes of wealth and poverty will be eliminated as will war be abolished.
Bahai teachings are one of many advantages to end suffering. Each religion has their view. Bahai are no different.
The religions of the past, what becomes of them if we have only one Faith?
Rhetorical question? We don't need one faith. Diversity is a blessing not a curse.
I don't think you understand what diversity means if you want them to be under one faith.
They all become part of that one Faith and are not destroyed or left behind because Baha'u'llah is the One prophesied in most of their Holy Books so they would see Him and His religion, as we all have, as an integral part of their religion's fulfillment. This is who we Baha'is are. People who discovered that the Promised One of our religion has appeared.
When they become one faith, their cultures and traditions are destroyed because you have place Bahaullah and god as the foundation where in your revealed religions, the god of Bahaullah and Bahallauh himself has no role as a person nor as a promised one. The sooner you understand this the better.
The Bahá'í Faith will never interfere with people who want to celebrate Christmas or worship Shiva and so on. Members of other Faiths who become Baha'is keep most of their past beliefs.
Bahai Christians, Bahai Hindu, Bahai Muslims, etc have different foundations than Christians, Hindu, and Muslims. The former has Bahaullah as their foundation as the last prophet for this age. The latter three religions do not.
Bahai Christian is not the same as a Christian.
A Bahai Christian would believe Bahaullah is the promised one found in the bible with whom, like christ, has the spirit of god (however you phrased in posts back when I asked was Bahaullah like christ's relationship with god in mainstream christianity), and is a universalist.
Christianity believes in only one god and only one savior/promised one. They do not believe the divinity of other religious prophets have the same divinity as that of christ (whether or not he is god is besides the point). They won't recognize Bahaullah as any manifestation of god. That's insulting Christians and the Jews.
The sooner you understand this the better.