Some, yes. It's the colloquial version of 'overuse of superlatives'. I do read the quotes, sometimes.
I suppose the Abrahamic God has a lot be to be proud about, being Omnipotent, All-Powerful lol.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Some, yes. It's the colloquial version of 'overuse of superlatives'. I do read the quotes, sometimes.
Couldn't help me too much in my studies about historic Jesus.
Heavily influenced by John, and his Faith was Orthodox.
The 616 can be calculated direct from prophecy, or so I understand. If that had been more helpful, for instance, if it had sent the result to the birth year of Bahauallah, which number do you think Bahai might have chosen?
It's all crazy anyway, to dismiss Spiritualism, Mediums, Healers, Fortune Tellers, Soothsayers etc whilst clinging so closely to numerology and the very word 'spiritual' .... just seems like yet another version of double-think double-speak.
Very Interesting figures. So no God, or religion not based on God, grows faster than mainstream religions, with the Baha'i Faith also growing fast in the background.
Interesting that has been foretold by Baha'u'llah.
I hope all is well.
Regards Tony
Well of course the first part is rubbish - I'm no brighter than anyone else...but I do think cherry-picking is a legitimate approach to deciding which religious beliefs to adopt and which to reject. The problem with the Baha'i (and other exclusive sects) approach is that the picking is entrusted to someone who already did the picking a long time ago and what might have seemed like sweet ripe cherries back then are fit only for pickling now if they are fit for anything at all.@siti 's brighter 'n me, so he might know how to teach about it, not that he actually uses it. That could be a problem..... if you ask an exponent of cherry-picking tgo teach it, they usually hotly deny all knowledge of the subject.
Despite a marked decline in religious belief in the West with countries like New Zealand, Australia, Canada, England, and the USA seeing major losses in numbers of Christians, the number of Abrahamic religious adherents globally are set to rise rapidly this century, with predicted to become the worlds largest religion.
The Changing Global Religious Landscape
Interesting times ahead.
In 1863, the Belgian Ambassador to Paris wrote of sensing "a widespread unease that once again the French were on the threshold of great unknown events...on every side I hear repeated ' if we are not at 1847, we are at least at 1845'" (Quoted by Cambridge historian JPT Bury in Napoleon III and the Second Empire, 1964, p.108)
In this quote, the references to 1845 and 1847 refer to the events leading up to the 1848 revolution that had ultimately brought Napoleon III to power as the elected President of the Second Republic after the overthrow of the monarchy of Louis Phillipe I - the last King of the French. The implications of those comments were pretty obvious - that many people - not just those who wrote it down - felt that Napoleon's days at the helm of the French nation were numbered.
So there is one - Eugene Beyens not only predicting the downfall of Napoleon III six years before Baha'u'llah wrote his letter, but capturing the mood of the French people who clearly anticipated further political turmoil. Were they all inspired?
Sorry, I am not following you. He wrote in 1863 about an event in 1848? How would that be a prediction? The date of prediction is after the date of the event? If you want to clarify it plz.In 1863, the Belgian Ambassador to Paris wrote of sensing "a widespread unease that once again the French were on the threshold of great unknown events...on every side I hear repeated ' if we are not at 1847, we are at least at 1845'" (Quoted by Cambridge historian JPT Bury in Napoleon III and the Second Empire, 1964, p.108)
In this quote, the references to 1845 and 1847 refer to the events leading up to the 1848 revolution that had ultimately brought Napoleon III to power as the elected President of the Second Republic after the overthrow of the monarchy of Louis Phillipe I - the last King of the French. The implications of those comments were pretty obvious - that many people - not just those who wrote it down - felt that Napoleon's days at the helm of the French nation were numbered.
So there is one - Eugene Beyens not only predicting the downfall of Napoleon III six years before Baha'u'llah wrote his letter, but capturing the mood of the French people who clearly anticipated further political turmoil. Were they all inspired?
And why do you openly sacrifice any pretense of intelligent reading ability in order to win an argument? By making reference to 1847 and 1845, Beyens was saying that France was no more than one to three years from another revolution - he was out by 4 years because the revolution didn't happen until 1870 - just as well for Baha'u'llah otherwise it might have happened before he wrote his letter. But in any case, read intelligently, Beyens' "prophecy" was more detailed than Baha'u'llah's - at least he indicated a timeframe. Pity Baha'u'llah didn't do that for the Baha'i Monarch - but it could happen - we have had a few oddballs on the throne of England over the centuries - one more wouldn't surprise me in the least. You should apply for it - you'd make a good monarch - by your avatar you've already got the hand waving thing down to a tee.Why do you offer predictions of less clarity, especially when you accuse Baha'u'llah of not being clear enough?
He wrote in 1863 that he felt that the political turmoil of 1848 would soon be repeated - it was in 1870. It was (according to him) a general feeling in Paris that political turmoil would soon repeat itself in France. You have to know something about French history of the period to put Baha'u'llah's "prophecy" in context. The point I am making is that it is absurd to suggest that Baha'u'llah's prediction that Napoleon would be deposed was a startling revelation that no-one else could have foreseen - and certainly not to the French who had changed their Head of State on average about once a year during the previous century. It would have been much more surprising if he had remained Emperor until his death - and even then, Baha'i's could still have claimed fulfillment of the prophecy and with God's hand directly in it to boot!Sorry, I am not following you. He wrote in 1863 about an event in 1848? How would that be a prediction? The date of prediction is after the date of the event? If you want to clarify it plz.
I suppose the Abrahamic God has a lot be to be proud about, being Omnipotent, All-Powerful lol.
Sorry, I am not following you. He wrote in 1863 about an event in 1848? How would that be a prediction? The date of prediction is after the date of the event? If you want to clarify it plz.
Thanks for clarifying it. Down and fall of kingdoms I think would be different than just dying. Bahaullah prophesied the kingdom of the Queen shall stay, but with regards to several others, He wrote they will fall. And as you see, the kingdom of the Queen has still remained to this date, even though that Queen died. Everybody dies, and that does not require prophecy. Now what matters is He did not make any prophecy that failed. I can predict 100 things, some of them will come true, most of them fail. But if I prophecy 20 events, and none of them fails, it is a sign of my knowledge of future predictions.He wrote in 1863 that he felt that the political turmoil of 1848 would soon be repeated - it was in 1870. It was (according to him) a general feeling in Paris that political turmoil would soon repeat itself in France. You have to know something about French history of the period to put Baha'u'llah's "prophecy" in context. The point I am making is that it is absurd to suggest that Baha'u'llah's prediction that Napoleon would be deposed was a startling revelation that no-one else could have foreseen - and certainly not to the French who had changed their Head of State on average about once a year during the previous century. It would have been much more surprising if he had remained Emperor until his death - and even then, Baha'i's could still have claimed fulfillment of the prophecy and with God's hand directly in it to boot!
Here's a really heartwarming site ... full of real life stories. Home - LGBTQ Baha'i Story Project
This story I see is very in tune to what we are offered when we consider Gods Laws;
It's interesting that the most adamant on-line anti-Baha'i sites are either Islamic or Christian. Hindus don't say much at all.
Baha'is are persecuted in Islamic dominated countries, but not in the one Hindu majority country, India. Yes, I suppose that could make the Abrahamic God proud somehow, but for the love of God, I don't know how.
When an aggressive violent culture interacts with a passive peaceful culture, normally the aggressive one annihilates the peaceful one. History has shown this time and again. Yes, your God works in mysterious ways.
Which "several others" did Baha'u'llah predict the downfall of?Bahaullah prophesied the kingdom of the Queen shall stay, but with regards to several others, He wrote they will fall. And as you see, the kingdom of the Queen has still remained to this date, even though that Queen died.
What story? You obviously didn't look at the site. It contained tons of stories, heartbreaking, and heartwarming, depending on POV, I suppose.
Yes, we know what the Baha'i stance on homosexuality is, Tony. Unfortunately.
This story I see is very in tune to what we are offered when we consider Gods Laws;
What is the truth behind Baha'i laws on homosexuality. - Read Stories - LGBTQ Baha'i Story Project
Regards Tony
Which "several others" did Baha'u'llah predict the downfall of?
The Abrahamic faiths have been consistently prophetic and avoided clairvoyants.