IT - this is a debate forum you don't get to send me away to do homework - if you make a claim you have to back it up with evidence.
You stated as evidence of the fulfillment of prophecy that Baha'u'llah said He was patient with the Kaiser. Now you either provide the reference for where Baha'u'llah said this or withdraw the point.
.
I had provided the quote already in my previous posts. Dear siti did you miss it?
This is at the end of Tablet of Bahaullah to the King of Berlin:
"Think deeply, O King, concerning him, and concerning them who, like unto thee, have conquered cities and ruled over men. The All-Merciful brought them down from their palaces to their graves. Be warned, be of them who reflect.
We have asked nothing from you.
For the sake of God We, verily, exhort you, and will be patient as We have been patient in that which hath befallen Us at your hands, O concourse of kings!"
Here is the link:
Bahá'í Reference Library - The Kitáb-i-Aqdas, Pages 49-63
In the Tablet Bahaullah is telling King of Berlin that He is exhorting the king, so he may do well, and walk in the right path, and be not like other wrongdoer kings, then He tells him farther that He will be patient, meaning He will be patient with the king, and therefor will not cease his life soon, but rather he is given enough time, so he may change his wrong way, and do well.
Now
.
Likewise, with the Queen's acceptance or at least non-rejection of Baha'u'llah's message - please either post actual evidence that the Queen even read Baha'u'llah's letter or admit that it is just a made up story to fit the idea of the Queen's supposed favour in the eyes of Baha'u'llah..
If I get some more time I will. I don't have any intention to convince you. My purpose in participation is to provide correct information when I can, and also through the debates learn new things I did not think perhaps before. It is strange that you do not want to search for info as well for yourself as a little homework my friend.
.
I don't see what relevance the Shah thing has but it is a fact that the Babis plotted to assassinate the Shah and it is entirely inappropriate to suggest that it was divine patience that thwarted the attempt on the Shah's life. Under the circumstances it is hardly surprising that the Shah was intolerant of Baha'u'llah who was, after all, the new head of the murderous sect that had attempted to kill him. It is also unsurprising that the Shah was eventually assassinated given that regicide was not exactly uncommon in Persia - he was in fact the ninth Shah to have been bumped off in two centuries. He was also the longest reigning monarch of the Qajar dynasty and the third longest reigning monarch in the entire history of Persia. So if Baha'u'llah was predicting a premature fall from power, he got that wrong too - he lasted longer than any ruler of Persia bar one (Tahmasp I) in 1500 years.
Dear siti, you did not understand what I meant by bringing up the subject of the King of Persia. Please read it again, and try to find the info for yourself, as my time is limited. If you did try but couldn't find, let me know, and I will find it for you.
With regards to the action of those few Bab'is trying to kill the king of Persia, you did not read from correct sources of history. Instead you have read those things that the enemies of Baha'is wrote, otherwise you should have known that, their action was not approved by Bahaullah. In fact eventually those who had imprisoned Bahaullah realized they made a mistake, and for that reason, they freed Bahaullah from the Prison of Ciyahchal in Tehran. Dear siti get your info from correct sources please, and look at the whole story, not just the part that serves your purpose which is rejecting Baha'i Faith.
