I understand, but, how do you know that it works?
I believe that the Messiah died for our sins because when people commit crimes they go to jail, and because God is love, He didn't want us to have to make the payment.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I understand, but, how do you know that it works?
Take that statement over to the Judaism DIR and see what their response will be. I know what it is because I belonged to a synagogue for over 20 years and taught [adults] in it.Jewish is an ethnicity, a religion, and a culture. Jewish is a nationality if one considers Israelis to be Jewish. but diaspora ethnic groups use different terminology from their country of origin.
Take that statement over to the Judaism DIR and see what their response will be. I know what it is because I belonged to a synagogue for over 20 years and taught [adults] in it.
Here:
Judaism shares some of the characteristics of a nation,[11][55][12][56][57][58] an ethnicity,[10] a religion, and a culture,[59][60][61] making the definition of who is a Jew vary slightly depending on whether a religious or national approach to identity is used.[62][63] Generally, in modern secular usage Jews include three groups: people who were born to a Jewish family regardless of whether or not they follow the religion, those who have some Jewish ancestral background or lineage (sometimes including those who do not have strictly matrilineal descent), and people without any Jewish ancestral background or lineage who have formally converted to Judaism and therefore are followers of the religion.[64] -- Jews - Wikipedia
There were some name changes as time went on, and it appears that the earliest name was "Hebrews". "Jews" was a term added later and appears to originally refer to Judah.Jewish is different from Hebrew and Israeli. The people of the Bible weren't called Israelis and a Jewish person saying that they are Hebrew would be like an African American saying they are African.
There were some name changes as time went on, and it appears that the earliest name was "Hebrews". "Jews" was a term added later and appears to originally refer to Judah.
See: Hebrews - Wikipedia
That's called a "non-sequitur".The term Jewish not existing until later supports that Jewish and Christian are not mutually exclusive.
That's called a "non-sequitur".
However, I never said that they were "mutually exclusive"-- just different religions that developed over time with different leadership and many different teachings and rules. I still go to both Christian and Jewish
services at times, but then I also have gone to mosques, Hindu temples, and Buddhist shrines.
I simply do not believe any one religion had a monopoly on Love and Truth and God.
The split was gradual, and one should rather easily see the beginnings of that in the Gospel.Before the separation of Judaism and Christianity, Jewish and Christian being different religions was a non-issue.
Depends on how one deals with the whole of Torah, and there's a HUGE and irreputable split on that.Following the Torah and Jesus are not mutually exclusive.
Polytheism is but not meditation. Matter of fact, one of the oldest forms of prayer in the early Church can be called "contemplative meditation" that could be based on scripture and/or praying for God's guidance. I use this far more often than "prayers of supplication [petition]".Believing in Jesus and meditation and polytheism are mutually exclusive.
The split was gradual, and one should rather easily see the beginnings of that in the Gospel.
Depends on how one deals with the whole of Torah, and there's a HUGE and irreputable split on that.
Polytheism is but not meditation. Matter of fact, one of the oldest forms of prayer in the early Church can be called "contemplative meditation" that could be based on scripture and/or praying for God's guidance. I use this far more often than "prayers of supplication [petition]".
The split was gradual, and one should rather easily see the beginnings of that in the Gospel.
Depends on how one deals with the whole of Torah, and there's a HUGE and irreputable split on that.
Polytheism is but not meditation. Matter of fact, one of the oldest forms of prayer in the early Church can be called "contemplative meditation" that could be based on scripture and/or praying for God's guidance. I use this far more often than "prayers of supplication [petition]".
By Mike Shreve| There is an undeniable link between far eastern religions and the contemplative prayer movement. One of its main proponents for many years was the Catholic monk, Thomas Merton, who was very pluralistic in his worldview. For instance, he asserted, “I see no contradiction between Buddhism and Christianity…I intend to become as good a Buddhist as I can.”*1
The truth is there are irreconcilable differences between Buddhism and Christianity. Buddha was basically atheistic in his worldview. He also taught that two beliefs that must be forsaken to achieve nirvana are: (1) the belief that we each have an individual soul; (2) the belief that our souls can have a personal existence in a heavenly state. Jesus strongly promoted the opposite. So how can these two worldviews be merged in any way?
I never said or implied it was, so why did you even post this?The first followers of Jesus were not called Christians.
Rabbinic interpretations are based on what's found in the Tanakh, but they are not held at the same level.There's a difference between rabbinic interpretation and the Old Testament itself.
False. What do you think the prophets did for often days on end in the desert? What do you think just spent so much time doing in the Garden? Do you honestly believe they just sat down and mouthed supplications for hours or days on end. Don't you know one of the main purposes of prayer is to listen? How can we listen if we are constantly mouthing word after word after word.Contemplative prayer is not supported by the Bible.
I've run across this nonsense many times over.Bible verses are to be taken in the proper context. Without proper context, truth and lies can easily be mixed. Is Contemplative Prayer A Legitimate Approach To God? | Reasons for Jesus
False. What do you think the prophets did for often days on end in the desert? What do you think just spent so much time doing in the Garden? Do you honestly believe they just sat down and mouthed supplications for hours or days on end. Don't you know one of the main purposes of prayer is to listen? How can we listen if we are constantly mouthing word after word after word.
I've run across this nonsense many times over.
Prayer is not just talking-- it's also listening and allowing the Holy Spirit to work within us.
Apparently, many contemplatives feel the spiritual, ecstatic state attained through their methods is no different than the supposed higher states of consciousness that Hindu, Buddhist, New Age and yoga advocates claim to reach. I contend that there is an enormous difference between the true experience of Jesus Christ as opposed to the paranormal experiences offered through these other groups. A few meditation and prayer methods promoted in the contemplative movement may be legitimate (like slowly and quietly pondering the meaning of God’s Word), while most are quite illegitimate.
I never said or implied it was, so why did you even post this?
Rabbinic interpretations are based on what's found in the Tanakh, but they are not held at the same level.
False. What do you think the prophets did for often days on end in the desert? What do you think just spent so much time doing in the Garden? Do you honestly believe they just sat down and mouthed supplications for hours or days on end. Don't you know one of the main purposes of prayer is to listen? How can we listen if we are constantly mouthing word after word after word.
I've run across this nonsense many times over.
Prayer is not just talking-- it's also listening and allowing the Holy Spirit to work within us.
The goal is achieving a state of non-thought: the same thing Buddhists and mystics of other Far Eastern religions reach for—in order to be lifted to a some so-called superior sphere of consciousness. In refuting methods like this, that are aimed to reach higher levels of spirituality, Ray Yungen offers the following observations:
“Legitimate mysticism was always initiated by God to certain individuals for certain revelations and was never based on a method for the changing of consciousness. In Acts, Peter fell into a trance while in prayer (Acts 11:5). But it was God, not Peter, who initiated the trance and facilitated it.”*6
Who said anything about a "mid-altering experience"? Not I, nor did I imply anything like that.Listening has nothing to do with having a mind altering experience
The Torah doesn't say anything about Jesus.The Torah itself doesn't teach that following Jesus and the Torah are mutually exclusive,
Who said anything about a "mid-altering experience"? Not I, nor did I imply anything like that.
The Torah doesn't say anything about Jesus.
I don't get on-line on Sundays, plus I usually use that break as an opportunity to end my involvement on most threads, thus this is likely my last post on this. It's not personal, so please don't take it that way.
Take care.
How does changing the subject completely qualify as a response either? Sometimes I just don't get you.The early followers of Jesus were not originally called Christians. The term is mentioned 3 times in the Bible.
How does changing the subject completely qualify as a response either? Sometimes I just don't get you.