outhouse
Atheistically
history isnt a problem
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How did Satan get to the garden of Eden?
- Thread starter jubilee131
- Start date
history isnt a problem
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Unless you think you can debunk a matter of faith with it.
Faith is debunked by the mere use of the word.
By definition believing something on faith is believing something that you can not validate or know is true.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Nay.
Faith is holding to a concept for which there is no evidence.
There is true faith.
This is exactly what I have said ya nit ??
How can you validate something for which there is no evidence ?
How can you know that something is true for which there is no evidence ?
I can tell you to have faith that some moon circling some planet is made of green cheese but this does not make it true.
Last edited:
waitasec
Veteran Member
well you're wrong.
because i believe in a concept that says you are.
see how that works?
wow.....
back to topic?
Last edited:
waitasec
Veteran Member
it's the easiest thing in the world to do...
just set the bar really low, that's how.
it's the easiest thing in the world to do...
just set the bar really low, that's how.
Ignorance is bliss ?!
waitasec
Veteran Member
as willful ignorance is misery
outhouse
Atheistically
actually you can.
using faith, yellow unicorns walk around with purple bigfoots
through history we see your mythology plain as day. The light of history turns what you call unknown, with no evidence, into evidence. this evidence kills faith in known mythology.
all you have left is what science and history do not have complete answers for. And you still choose to refuse common knowledge due to mythology.
sincerly
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by sincerly
"Simple logic' is evil when it is from a mind that has as its motivation/purpose to contradict the "thus saith the Lord GOD".
GOD said, "thou shall not kill"/murder; and, "Love thy neighbor as yourself".
"Simple logic' is evil when it is from a mind that has as its motivation/purpose to contradict the "thus saith the Lord GOD".
GOD said, "thou shall not kill"/murder; and, "Love thy neighbor as yourself".
Thief
Rogue Theologian
I think you're cross quoting.
Makes it difficult to sort through.
Truth is not an item of evidence.
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you....is a true belief.
You believe you should do so....don't you?
It is self 'evident'.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
actually you can.
using faith, yellow unicorns walk around with purple bigfoots
through history we see your mythology plain as day. The light of history turns what you call unknown, with no evidence, into evidence. this evidence kills faith in known mythology.
all you have left is what science and history do not have complete answers for. And you still choose to refuse common knowledge due to mythology.
Poor comparisons.
outhouse
Atheistically
not from your context.
they are 100% accurate
faith means belief with ZERO evidence, and in the end, you have zero evidence.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
I don't need evidence to be reasonable and responsible.
But I need to be reasonable and responsible to stand well before God.
Originally Posted by sincerly
"Simple logic' is evil when it is from a mind that has as its motivation/purpose to contradict the "thus saith the Lord GOD".
GOD said, "thou shall not kill"/murder; and, "Love thy neighbor as yourself".
Actually it was Jesus who said "love thy neighbor as thyself"
God also said go out and kill women and children.
Either God contradicts himself or those who claim the Bible speaks for God are wrong.
Nothing so difficult that a 5th grader could not figure it out.
If your claim is that I am cross quoting (whatever that means) then state how I have done this.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
So...you DO understand what I've been posting....
and yet you insist upon disagreeing?
disagreeing with what ?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Can't speak for previous prophets....they aren't participating.
But if you survive your last breath....you can ask them.
And Jesus was not the author of the golden rule.
It was carved in stone at least a thousand years before Him.