How did the Egyptians build the pyramids?

[cladking]

Assertion on your part without any qualifications nor independent documentations.

Your assertion is an assertion. I have already shown there's no means of knowing they are properly translated unless you can make a prediction so your assertion is not even on point. To be on point you'd have t tell me how you knew they were properly translated and then show they meet that criteria.

You aren't even trying.

I have shown they are not translated many times and we can go through it again if you ever respond on point.

 

[cladking]

No carried up the sides of the pyramid using strps shown in the reference. including pictures of the clading.

I don't know what this even means. But I'm certain you won't explain yourself.

You seem not to know that the average stone in the pyramid is about 2 1/2 tons. The average cladding stone was 10 tons. I seriously doubt they were "carried" anywhere at all.

 

[Pogo]

Defining "simple machines" is not responding. You need to show what machines were used and evidence it was used.

Respond.

You are the one who needs to demonstrate that the builders had anything available to them that was not just a combination of simple machines. You are the one claiming unknown technology.

 

[cladking]

You are the one who needs to demonstrate that the builders had anything available to them that was not just a combination of simple machines. You are the one claiming unknown technology.

Osiris in his name of seker tows the earth by means of balance.

 

[Pogo]

AS I showed these should be the coldest stones on the pyramid.

No you asserted it with a few nonsensical reasons beyond that the stones are slightly inset which could easily cause them to retain heat due to lack of exposure after sun warming. there is no evidence or even discussion of how this image relates to others or under what circumstances it was produced. Maybe the Mafdet Mongoose pissed on it and cooled the adjacent part off.
You have a data point, that is all.

Remember the Mafdet Mongoose?

you made some claims about a god by that name, but no explanation as to how it could be responsible or evidence that it even exists beyond being the name of a deity that a prescientific culture believed in, no more evidential than a claim that thunder is Thor banging his hammer.

 

[cladking]

You are the one who needs to demonstrate that the builders had anything available to them that was not just a combination of simple machines. You are the one claiming unknown technology.

I've have shown extensive evidence for the usage of funiculars and I have a great deal more; thousands of data points. But nobody is responding to any of the evidence I cite and is instead posting stuff they find on the net that even Egyptologists know aren't true.

 

[Shaul]

I know the answer to this one. It was a scheme, a pyramid scheme.

 

[cladking]

No you asserted it with a few nonsensical reasons beyond that the stones are slightly inset which could easily cause them to retain heat due to lack of exposure after sun warming. there is no evidence or even discussion of how this image relates to others or under what circumstances it was produced.

Should I just number you in the group who doesn't understand heat and how it flows?

Those characteristics I enumerated and actually exist are the chief determinants of the temperature of the stones and how that related to surrounding stones. EVERY single one will tend to make the stones colder, not warmer. That they are recessed will tend to make them cool more slowly on windy days but it will "never" cause them to be significantly warmer. This isn't about the rate at which they cool, it is about the rate they warm up in the morning.

Egyptologists don't understand any of this. Remember Hawass asked Egyptologists what was causing it? Ironically it is caused by the mafdet mongoose of whose existence they are unaware. I knew it was there BEFORE the scan which is why I predicted the hot spot. Before the scan Egyptologists were saying they didn't need no stinkin' scan at all because the pyramid was an homogenous lump so nothing could show up.

It is not homogenous and we can see "Mafdet" crouched under the NE corner just like the builders said.

 

[cladking]

you made some claims about a god by that name, but no explanation as to how it could be responsible or evidence that it even exists beyond being the name of a deity that a prescientific culture believed in, no more evidential than a claim that thunder is Thor banging his hammer.

Briefly since you responded on point;

Sphinxes were normally made in pairs so there's one missing.
There is something more than 130' long buried under the NE corner as visible in the gravimetric scan.
The builders said seshat (the feminine of human progress) inscribed the Book of Thot while hanging from ropes in the dark.
in order that Mafdet survive it must be surrounded by wall.
A large block of stone surrounded by walls in a pyramid is a heat sink.
The builders said there was a passage to the outside on the east side so I knew this heat sink would be visible in infrared when temperatures changed.

It is visible in October exactly as I predicted.

I can elaborate because there is far more evidence than just this.

 

[shunyadragon]

I don't know what this even means. But I'm certain you won't explain yourself.

your English is indeed marginal at best.

You seem not to know that the average stone in the pyramid is about 2 1/2 tons. The average cladding stone was 10 tons. I seriously doubt they were "carried" anywhere at all.

the casing stones were much smaller and not 2 1/2 tons. Your intentional ignorance is profound

 

[cladking]

there is no evidence or even discussion of how this image relates to others or under what circumstances it was produced.

Yeah, this was funny back in October of 2015. Hawass kept leaking data faster than the mafdet leaked heat. There wasn't enough data to be too sure of anything but then every day he released more with a slip of the lip. The most important piece of information was that this stayed hot all day.

It's the same with the hot spot I predicted at the chevrons. I even specifically said this one wouldn't be as dramatic and might not even show up without time lapse photography or computer enhancement. This is largely because of wind direction and the much greater chance it was filled in after construction.

Many of my predictions have come true and I have many more that will come true.

 

[shunyadragon]

Should I just number you in the group who doesn't understand heat and how it flows?

You are the one that rejects science, and does not remotely vomprehend the evidence and references provided.

Those characteristics I enumerated and actually exist are the chief determinants of the temperature of the stones and how that related to surrounding stones. EVERY single one will tend to make the stones colder, not warmer. That they are recessed will tend to make them cool more slowly on windy days but it will "never" cause them to be significantly warmer. This isn't about the rate at which they cool, it is about the rate they warm up in the morning.

Egyptologists don't understand any of this. Remember Hawass asked Egyptologists what was causing it? Ironically it is caused by the mafdet mongoose of whose existence they are unaware. I knew it was there BEFORE the scan which is why I predicted the hot spot. Before the scan Egyptologists were saying they didn't need no stinkin' scan at all because the pyramid was an homogenous lump so nothing could show up.

It is not homogenous and we can see "Mafdet" crouched under the NE corner just like the builders said.

The problem is your intentional ignorance of science and in particular Physics. The wind has little or no effect except limited changes in surface temps and to limited extent surface wethering,

What are mafdet mongoose?

Explain the :"History of Granite" you referenced that you claim Egyptologists reject..

 

[cladking]

the casing stones were much smaller and not 2 1/2 tons. Your intentional ignorance is profound

You sure don't seem to mind being wrong.

These are much larger than the backing stones. Of course all of them wouldn't have been THIS big but they were all larger than the backing stones.

 

[cladking]

You sure don't seem to mind being wrong.

View attachment 100247

These are much larger than the backing stones. Of course all of them wouldn't have been THIS big but they were all larger than the backing stones.

These stones appear to me to be more than 20 tons.

 

[shunyadragon]

Your assertion is an assertion. I have already shown there's no means of knowing they are properly translated unless you can make a prediction so your assertion is not even on point. To be on point you'd have t tell me how you knew they were properly translated and then show they meet that criteria.

You aren't even trying.

I have shown they are not translated many times and we can go through it again if you ever respond on point.

No need to go through anything sych as you mythical nonsense translation issues since you have no qualifications, and presented no legitimate academic sources to support your claims.

 

[cladking]

What are mafdet mongoose?

Look it up.

Egyptologists have a lot wrong and I've caught them in hundreds of errors.

Mafdet

Mafdet is depicted as a predator of uncertain species, with the cheetah, lynx, civet and mongoose all being candidates. Indeed, it may well be the case that at different times and in different plac…

henadology.wordpress.com

Most believe mafdet was a lynx but it was a mongoose and the second Sphinx was carved into mafdet. It is mafdet surrounded by walls that gets hot in the summer and releases her heat in the autumn. This effect is even more pronounced in the spring when cold air pours out. This is why the builders called the passage which channeled this air the "Cool is the Crown Path". Crowns were fluid flows and the crown coming from mafdet was very very cool.

 

[cladking]

No need to go through anything sych as you mythical nonsense translation issues since you have no qualifications, and presented no legitimate academic sources to support your claims.

No.

These are the words the builders actually chiseled into the walls;

The earth is high under the sky by (means of) thine arms, Tefnut.

You can protest all you want but these words are chiseled in stone.

 

[shunyadragon]

You sure don't seem to mind being wrong.

View attachment 100247

These are much larger than the backing stones. Of course all of them wouldn't have been THIS big but they were all larger than the backing stones.

This picture does not represent the casing stones except for the base. They were likely installed the same way as the other stones on ramps.

 

[shunyadragon]

Look it up.

Egyptologists have a lot wrong and I've caught them in hundreds of errors. \

You lack the qualifications to make such assertions.

No.

These are the words the builders actually chiseled into the walls;

The earth is high under the sky by (means of) thine arms, Tefnut.

You can protest all you want but these words are chiseled in stone.

Mafdet

Mafdet is depicted as a predator of uncertain species, with the cheetah, lynx, civet and mongoose all being candidates. Indeed, it may well be the case that at different times and in different plac…

henadology.wordpress.com

Most believe mafdet was a lynx but it was a mongoose and the second Sphinx was carved into mafdet. It is mafdet surrounded by walls that gets hot in the summer and releases her heat in the autumn. This effect is even more pronounced in the spring when cold air pours out. This is why the builders called the passage which channeled this air the "Cool is the Crown Path". Crowns were fluid flows and the crown coming from mafdet was very very cool.

OK you are referring to a mythical god/human/animal that does not exist,

 

[cladking]

These are much larger than the backing stones. Of course all of them wouldn't have been THIS big but they were all larger than the backing stones.

It also should be pointed out that Greek visitors reported that the stone were enormous. Of course they couldn't have been as large as was reported but it is probably indicative of the fact that the seams were so tight they couldn't be seen.

There is not a lot known about these but if all patterns hold they probably averaged some 10 tons and were not "carried" anywhere.