So you can deduce what God can do, but not that he exists. How is that not made up?
I can deduce what God can do
if He exists by looking at the evidence.
If an omnipotent God exists and has a need to come to earth we would see God here.
It also means no one can say what God is, what God can do, what God can't do, or anything. All you can do is guess, and how is that useful?
We can have a belief about all that based on scriptures, even though it cannot be proven.
A belief is not a guess, since it is based upon something concrete, scriptures revealed by a Messenger.
But you tell us all about what God can or can't do, so why not this?
Because Baha'u'llah wrote that God could prove He exists, and that also makes sense to me that an omnipotent God could do that.
So what? Couldn't he be making it up just like you do?
Why would God make such a thing up? Why would I make it up?
It makes sense that an omnipotent God could prove that He exists to everyone if He wanted to.
You don't say you believe, you write in affirmative statements which suggest fact. That is deceptive. So everything you write is your opinion?
It goes without saying that everything I write about God or Messengers is what I believe since I have said repeatedly that it is not a proven fact.
But you don't have proof, and your evidence is weak, so what you do is guessing.
My evidence appears weak to you, but my evidence appears strong to be. That is why it is not like guessing.
Just your opinion. Where is the evidence and argument that your opinion is well thought out?
It has been well thought out by me. I can only explain how I thought it out but that won't be satisfactory for people who think differently.