You are guessing they are genuine and truthful. They offer no evidence that they are. For some reason you are convinced, but skilled thinkers are not.
They offered plenty of evidence. Baha'is are skilled thinkers and that is why they recognize the evidence.
Messengers are all dead, so there is nothing to observe. You rely on their writings, and no one can ask them questions, because they are still dead. The things all your messengers claim are fantastic, namely them cliaming a God exists. There is no evidence of that when they refer to Gods. So we have reason to doubt them.
There is nothing fantastic about claiming a God exists. People have known that God exists since the beginning of time.
There is evidence for God, it is the Messengers of God. Creation is also evidence but it is less direct evidence.
Facts are what critical thinkers require. So you are out of luck.
Facts about Baha'u'llah are what Baha'is require, and since we have them we are not out of luck.
Why would we be out of luck because you cannot see the evidence? We are only responsible for our own beliefs, nobody else's.
But you got your last thing. So why can't you better manage your wishes and thinking? You sound out of control and a victim. Why not think for yourself and claim your agency like critical thinkers?
I don't want a religion because I don't like organized religion but I believe in Baha'u'llah so I belong to a religion.
I am completely in control because I know what I am doing and why I am doing it.
I think for myself. I believe the Baha'i Faith is true so God exists, and that is why I am a Baha'i.
So ask yourself why you decided it is proof for you. Somehow you got everything you insist you don't want. Sounds like chaos.
People don't decide why something is proof to them. It is proof to me because of the way I think, but it is not proof to you because of the way you think.
What I want does not matter. Only truth matters to me. I don't like organized religion so I don't participate with the other Baha'is.
Yes, you don't seem to be asking yourself any of these questions, just a puppet for some subconscious desires that your conscious mind thinks it doesn't want.
I ask myself all these questions and I am consciously aware of the answers.
If a God provided evidence then it exists, and if it exists it is a fact. You don't have to believe in God if it exists.
If a God provided proof that He exists, then it would be a fact that God exists. But as I have said myriad times, there is no proof that God exists, there is only evidence. Since there is no proof people either believe that God exists or they do not believe that God exists.
But again you select a set of inconsistent words that mix different meanings and claims.
I have explained it very clearly, over and over and over and over again. I never mix meanings or claims. Here it is again.
Evidence: the available body of facts or information
indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid:
https://www.google.com/search
Evidence is anything that you see, experience,
read, or are
told that
causes you to believe that something is true or has
really happened.
Objective evidence definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
Proof: evidence or argument
establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement:
https://www.google.com/search
There are many kinds of evidence, and not all evidence is verifiable.
Verifiable evidence is proof because it establishes something as a fact.
Fact: something that is
known to have
happened or to
exist,
especially something for which
proof exists, or about which there is
information:
fact
Fact: a thing that is known or proved to be true.
what is a fact - Google Search
There is no proof that Baha'u'llah was a Messenger of God, since there is no verifiable evidence that He received any communication from God. There is only evidence that indicates that was the case.
There is no proof that God exists, since there is no verifiable evidence of God's existence.
I sure hope we got this squared away this time.
You will come back and admit that you don't know a God exists, and that you don't know if it provided evidence. A total reversal of your strong asertion "because of the evidence tat God has provided."
I know a God exists and I know God provided evidence. I have never faltered on that belief.