How does everybody like the new look?

[JustGeorge]

Using the funny frubal in that manner is a rule violation. (Rule 9, not in alignment with forum mission)

I find some feel the optimistic frubal to be rude... that one goes over my head. I see where it could be, but I can also see where a person is wanting to use it in a well meaning manner, but it throws up the defenses of the other person anyways.

@John53 (forgot to quote)

 

[Secret Chief]

I find some feel the optimistic frubal to be rude... that one goes over my head.

You mean I've been wasting them on you? Sheesh.

 

[JustGeorge]

You mean I've been wasting them on you? Sheesh.

They weren't wasted. I turned them into stickers and stuck them all over my husband's car.

He still thinks neighborhood kids were doing it...

 

[Debater Slayer]

Struggling with it, can't find stuff

You're not alone. I'm destined to only ever post in this thread. (cheers all round)

What are you trying to find?

 

[Polymath257]

$\int_0^1 x\ dx$

\int_0^1 x\ dx

Doesn't look like it. @Debater Slayer

 

[Polymath257]

Ouch! My percentage of frubals to messages dropped significantly!

 

[exchemist]

I don't know if it's just my browser (Safari) but I'm finding the author of the post to which a responder is replying appears in such a light grey colour that it is almost invisible. For example in post140, @Saint Frankenstein is responding to whom? Well, I can just make it out if look really hard - it's @JustGeorge . But I very nearly can't see it at all.

Can this be darkened a bit to improve the colour contrast?

 

[John53]

I don't know if it's just my browser (Safari) but I'm finding the author of the post to which a responder is replying appears in such a light grey colour that it is almost invisible. For example in post140, @Saint Frankenstein is responding to whom? Well, I can just make it out if look really hard - it's @JustGeorge . But I very nearly can't see it at all.

Can this be darkened a bit to improve the colour contrast?

Shows up in orange in firefox. Visible but not attractive.

 

[ChristineM]

I don't know if it's just my browser (Safari) but I'm finding the author of the post to which a responder is replying appears in such a light grey colour that it is almost invisible. For example in post140, @Saint Frankenstein is responding to whom? Well, I can just make it out if look really hard - it's @JustGeorge . But I very nearly can't see it at all.

Can this be darkened a bit to improve the colour contrast?

At the bottom of the page change the style from ReligiousForums.com - UI.X to default. It alters all colours to be more readable

Shows up in orange in firefox. Visible but not attractive.

Using the default screen style does that

 

[ChristineM]

Ouch! My percentage of frubals to messages dropped significantly!

You are not alone, mine have roughly halved. It looks like only likes only likes have been carried over

 

[Polymath257]

You are not alone, mine have roughly halved. It looks like only likes only likes have been carried over

I miss my 'wins'!

 

[Revoltingest]

The old frubal system was abused at times, the funny and optimistic ones were sometimes used as insults. Maybe the direct approach is better?

This is just as easy to abuse....but with less variety.

 

[John53]

At the bottom of the page change the style from ReligiousForums.com - UI.X to default. It alters all colours to be more readable



Using the default screen style does that

Once you change to UI.X there doesn't appear to be a way to go back and I now know what @exchemist was talking about when he said the author of the post they're responding to is very hard to read.

Edit: worked it out, you have to do it in preferences and save the change

 

[ChristineM]

I miss my 'wins'!

Here ya go.

 

[Apostle John]

I like it a lot myself

I think it’s brilliant. I can tap on the last reply to posts when I couldn’t before. It’s great.

 

[ChristineM]

Once you change to UI.X there doesn't appear to be a way to go back and I now know what @exchemist was talking about when he said the author of the post they're responding to is very hard to read.

Hmmm, I've been swapping between them all day trying to decide which is best. I generally prefer the RF colours (except the ones i don't see) while the default is has no hidden colour but is so in your face
.

Changing is the same for both styles.

If i remember correctly it was difficult to change from default to RF on yesterday's software

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Why not add some living people colors to the logo people rather than recently undead and chronically undead people colors? You can barely see three of them as it is.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Why not add some living people colors to the logo people rather than recently undead and chronically undead people colors?

Lol, good point.

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

At the bottom of the page change the style from ReligiousForums.com - UI.X to default. It alters all colours to be more readable



Using the default screen style does that

Thanks for letting me know about that. I appreciate it.

 

[Debater Slayer]

For reference:

Software Update FAQ Thread

Hi, all! This thread is for FAQs about the recent software update. I will list as many FAQs as I can and address each. Why the software update? The old software was too outdated and broken to sustain the forum any longer. It also rendered forum maintenance essentially impossible and caused...

www.religiousforums.com