I don't believe he was enlightened. So moot to ya.
Eighteen pages it took to arrive at that?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't believe he was enlightened. So moot to ya.
Eighteen pages it took to arrive at that?
Im referring to our chemical and biological composition leading to the identification of ones self. Prior to birth you were factually dead. Obviously, you arose from that under the right conditions.No it's not. You don't arise from the dead unless your dead first. You are the enemy of logic and facts.
I pretty much stated that at the beginning.
I pretty much stated that at the beginning.
Sort of. I took your position to be that Buddha, who is highly regarded as being enlightened, was a misogynist, and that Buddhists are foolish to regard him so highly.
But the arguments have kind of meandered back and forth between a critique of Gautama and varying Buddhist patriarchal cultures, Buddhists themselves, and the Dharma. It's been hard to follow, tbh.
Im referring to our chemical and biological composition leading to the identification of ones self. Prior to birth you were factually dead. Obviously, you arose from that under the right conditions.
Since when do the debates on here do not meander? I pretty much am critiquing the Buddha for one being a misogynist. I have other critiques which I believe explains his misogyny.
Since when do the debates on here do not meander? I pretty much am critiquing the Buddha for one being a misogynist. I have other critiques which I believe explains his misogyny.
Offer up these other critiques.
That'll get this party started. This has the potential to become super-entertaining and really educational.
Ok. I believe that Gautama due to his extremely sheltered life and his subsequent exposure to the painful fact of existence was psychologically traumatize and choose to deal with this trauma with repression and denial. He probably developed a form of schizophrenia due to this trauma. He probably develop a hatred for women due to the fact that it is women who bring people into this world of suffering.
That added significantly to the depth of BS on this Forum, which is saying something.
We just admire the ones who manage to get famous faults and all.Most of the saviors and prophets people admire were deeply disturbed people. And I am not the first to notice this. Freud blazed the trail, and I kind of get Freud's point.
We just admire the ones who manage to get famous faults and all.
it's true, in more superstitious times mental illness was seen as evidence of having been touched by god: 'touched' even survived into our own time as a euphemism for 'mentally ill'.Most of the saviors and prophets people admire were deeply disturbed people.
Ok. I believe that Gautama due to his extremely sheltered life and his subsequent exposure to the painful fact of existence was psychologically traumatize and choose to deal with this trauma with repression and denial. He probably developed a form of schizophrenia due to this trauma. He probably develop a hatred for women due to the fact that it is women who bring people into this world of suffering.
it's true, in more superstitious times mental illness was seen as evidence of having been touched by god: 'touched' even survived into our own time as a euphemism for 'mentally ill'.
If Isaiah or Ezekiel had lived in our time we can be pretty sure they'd be safely locked away in secure institutions.
Definition looks compatible to me.Invest in a dictionary please then look up the word "dead".