Humans did NOT evolve from the common ancestor of Apes

[Thief]

Back to Chapter Two of Genesis.

Ideal living condition (petri dish) and a chosen specimen.
Anesthesia, surgery, cloning, genetic manipulation....

as I am quoting myself.....

Man did not evolve from the ape.
There was interference.

 

[Looncall]

as I am quoting myself.....

Man did not evolve from the ape.
There was interference.

What is your evidence for this?

Do we now have two crackpots on this thread?

 

[Aman777]

Arguments were asked for, not random passages from a random book from a random region of the world.

Why should we care about what the Bible says?

Dear Riverwolf, Science is "willingly ignorant" of what happened on Adam's world, and I am posting the BEST and ONLY evidence available. Is it my fault today's scientists are so uninformed? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Aman777]

I second this.

Dear Delta, Science is "willingly ignorant" of what happened on Adam's world, and I am posting the BEST and ONLY evidence available. Is it my fault today's scientists are so uninformed? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Riverwolf]

Dear Riverwolf, Science is "willingly ignorant" of what happened on Adam's world, and I am posting the BEST and ONLY evidence available.

You've posted no evidence whatsoever. The Bible is not evidence. It's just a random book, written by men of ages past.

Shall I prove to you that you're wrong by quoting from Voluspa?

 

[Aman777]

You keep saying your arguments are supported by science, history and scripture. Yet the only thing we see here is scripture references. I think your interpretation of scripture is skewed, but that is irrelevant. Give is your scientific support for the idea that humans existed before the common ancestor of the other apes. Scientific, not scriptural.

Dear FA, Science is "willingly ignorant" of what happened on Adam's world, and I am posting the BEST and ONLY evidence available. Is it my fault today's scientists are so uninformed? You must remember that God knows EVERYthing but today's scientists are confused by their own False Theories such as the ToE. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Monk Of Reason]

Dear Riverwolf, Science is "willingly ignorant" of what happened on Adam's world, and I am posting the BEST and ONLY evidence available. Is it my fault today's scientists are so uninformed? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Define evidence. And then say with a strait face that biblical verses with no physical evidence is evidence.

 

[Aman777]

What is your evidence for this?

Do we now have two crackpots on this thread?

Dear Loon, There are lot more crackpots on this thread than you seem to know. With NO evidence to offer, they cry for evidence which their precious Theories CANNOT explain. When you show them God's Truth, they whine and bawl that you don't have any evidence from the Bumpkin scientists who CLAIM to know everything. LOL God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Aman777]

You've posted no evidence whatsoever. The Bible is not evidence. It's just a random book, written by men of ages past.

Shall I prove to you that you're wrong by quoting from Voluspa?

Dear Riverwolf, It is when it AGREES in every way with EVERY discovery of Science and History. I have posted such and NO Evol has been able to refute me. I have also posted the ONLY empirical evidence which totaly REFUTES the False ToE HISTORICALLY, and NO one has offered ANY evidence which contradicts my postings, Historically. Here is the evidence AGAIN:

Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE

What is shows is that the FIRST modern Humans arrived in the mountains of Ararat and the Valleys of Northern Mesopotamia some 10k years ago, and the FIRST Human farming began and cities were built by and Named by Noah's great grandsons in Gen 10:10....and HISTORY agrees, since some of those FIRST cities are STILL there. IF you don't believe me, name an Older Human city on this Earth.

The False ToE falsely teaches that Humans became Fully Human 195k years ago. This is provably FALSE since these prehistoric people NEVER grew a crop nor built a city until AFTER God tells us Noah arrived and brought Human civilization to this Planet of the descendants of the common ancestor of Apes. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Riverwolf]

Dear Riverwolf, It is when it AGREES in every way with EVERY discovery of Science and History.

You have not demonstrated this to be the case.

The Bible can't even agree with its own history.

I have posted such and NO Evol has been able to refute me. I have also posted the ONLY empirical evidence which totaly REFUTES the False ToE HISTORICALLY, and NO one has offered ANY evidence which contradicts my postings, Historically. Here is the evidence AGAIN:

Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE

What is shows is that the FIRST modern Humans arrived in the mountains of Ararat and the Valleys of Northern Mesopotamia some 10k years ago, and the FIRST Human farming began and cities were built by and Named by Noah's great grandsons in Gen 10:10....and HISTORY agrees, since some of those FIRST cities are STILL there. IF you don't believe me, name an Older Human city on this Earth.

The False ToE falsely teaches that Humans became Fully Human 195k years ago. This is provably FALSE since these prehistoric people NEVER grew a crop nor built a city until AFTER God tells us Noah arrived and brought Human civilization to this Planet of the descendants of the common ancestor of Apes.

That map shows no such thing, and the theory of evolution demonstrates no such thing. Anatomically modern humans were not necessarily behaviorally modern humans.

Plenty of Tribes still exist that grow no crops. Art from caves, as well as hundreds of artifacts, point to full behavioral modernity existing well before the Agricultural Revolution.... which is not an aspect of biological evolution, but of anthropology. In any case, the Bible does not demonstrate any of your claims. Far as I can tell, they're entirely of your own invention.

 

[Aman777]

You have not demonstrated this to be the case.

The Bible can't even agree with its own history.

That map shows no such thing, and the theory of evolution demonstrates no such thing. Anatomically modern humans were not necessarily behaviorally modern humans.

Dear Riverwolf, Correction: The Bible does NOT agree with YOUR interpretation. Does this mean that you are smarter than God? God tells us of TWO creations of mankind. Are you a Biblical Scholar?

Plenty of Tribes still exist that grow no crops. Art from caves, as well as hundreds of artifacts, point to full behavioral modernity existing well before the Agricultural Revolution.... which is not an aspect of biological evolution, but of anthropology. In any case, the Bible does not demonstrate any of your claims. Far as I can tell, they're entirely of your own invention.

False, since History records that for 99% of the time since prehistoric people diverged from Chimps, they remained just like the Animals they were. Just because their bones looked like Humans, does NOT mean that they were Humans. Only in the last 10k years do we find evidence of modern Humans.

The first Human, Adam, FARMED with NO evolution. Adam's son Cain, built the first Human city on Adam's world. Read Genesis 4 and you will recognize that difference between stick drawings and the Technology of the first Humans, who descended from Cain and inherited the unique Human intelligence of Adam, who was made with the highest form of intelligence, which is like God's. Gen 3:22

It's really hard to refute this view since it relies on the AGREEMENT of Scripture, Science, and History. I find that YOUR views are only part Truths. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[outhouse]

Feed the POE

 

[fantome profane]

Dear FA, Science is "willingly ignorant" of what happened on Adam's world, and I am posting the BEST and ONLY evidence available. Is it my fault today's scientists are so uninformed? You must remember that God knows EVERYthing but today's scientists are confused by their own False Theories such as the ToE. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Great, so science is "willfully ignorant" and scientists are "confused" and "uninformed". Fantastic. And this is the reason that science does not back up the ideas you have presented here. Wonderful, but that still means that your ideas are not backed up by science. And therefore your claim that your ideas are backed up by science has been fully and completely refuted, by your own words. Thank you.

Feed the POE

I am done now.

 

[Aman777]

Great, so science is "willfully ignorant" and scientists are "confused" and "uninformed". Fantastic. And this is the reason that science does not back up the ideas you have presented here. Wonderful, but that still means that your ideas are not backed up by science. And therefore your claim that your ideas are backed up by science has been fully and completely refuted, by your own words. Thank you.

I am done now.

Dear FP, Scientists have Rejected God's Truth in Genesis because they CANNOT understand it. i do, but scientists STILL reject the Truth of Genesis, because they don't believe me. i believe it is because Scientists have been mislead by the False assumptions of the Theory of Evolution.

Evols have been force teaching the Biggest Lie in the History of Human Civilization, to our children, for more than 50 years now. When you inform them that their False ToE is totally incomplete because they have REJECTED the FACT that Adam, the first Human, was made on another Earth, in another world, which was totally destroyed in the Flood, they call you names and imply that you're nuts. ll Peter 3:3-7 They insist that Humans are nothing but animals. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[fantome profane]

Dear FP, Scientists have Rejected God's Truth in Genesis because they CANNOT understand it. i do, but scientists STILL reject the Truth of Genesis, because they don't believe me. i believe it is because Scientists have been mislead by the False assumptions of the Theory of Evolution.

Evols have been force teaching the Biggest Lie in the History of Human Civilization, to our children, for more than 50 years now. When you inform them that their False ToE is totally incomplete because they have REJECTED the FACT that Adam, the first Human, was made on another Earth, in another world, which was totally destroyed in the Flood, they call you names and imply that you're nuts. ll Peter 3:3-7 They insist that Humans are nothing but animals. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Great, so there is no need for you to continue to claim the support of science. Your understanding is clearly superior to science.

 

[Sapiens]

Scientists have Rejected God's Truth in Genesis because they CANNOT understand it.

Oh, we can understand it all right, we can even diagnose it.

i do, but scientists STILL reject the Truth of Genesis, because they don't believe me.

True, true, we don't believe you. We all (all of us scientists that is) had a meeting in Antarctica last week and we decide that WE DON'T BELIEVE YOU, every last one of us.

i believe it is because Scientists have been mislead by the False assumptions of the Theory of Evolution.

Would you care to list the top three False assumptions of the Theory of Evolution. Please remember that persisting in using discredited arguments simply rebounds—it’s the truth that sets you free (John 8:32), not error.

Evols have been force teaching the Biggest Lie in the History of Human Civilization, to our children, for more than 50 years now. When you inform them that their False ToE is totally incomplete because they have REJECTED the FACT that Adam, the first Human, was made on another Earth, in another world, which was totally destroyed in the Flood, they call you names and imply that you're nuts.

Got some support aside from your own misreading of the Bible (It's a book ... and it's good) of this strange and revisionist ideology?

It is you failure to provide such support is what brings ridicule and pejoratives down upon you.

ll Peter 3:3-7 They insist that Humans are nothing but animals. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

No, we're tankful that humans are animals and not plants ... well, most people.

 

[Aman777]

Great, so there is no need for you to continue to claim the support of science. Your understanding is clearly superior to science.

Dear FP, No, but unlike the False ToE, my view agrees with every discovery of Science and History, therefore, it's the Same Truth as that of Science, no matter how you look at it. The False ToE is nothing more than an incomplete, untrue, false assumption, of men who are afraid of their certain righteous Judgment. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Aman777]

Oh, we can understand it all right, we can even diagnose it.

True, true, we don't believe you. We all (all of us scientists that is) had a meeting in Antarctica last week and we decide that WE DON'T BELIEVE YOU, every last one of us.
Would you care to list the top three False assumptions of the Theory of Evolution. Please remember that persisting in using discredited arguments simply rebounds—it’s the truth that sets you free (John 8:32), not error.

Got some support aside from your own misreading of the Bible (It's a book ... and it's good) of this strange and revisionist ideology?

It is you failure to provide such support is what brings ridicule and pejoratives down upon you.

No, we're tankful that humans are animals and not plants ... well, most people.

Dear Sapiens, Ha, ha, ha. You're really funny. You should be on the Stage. Having a "tankful" is how some people spend the entire holiday weekend. :faint: God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Sapiens]

The best you can do is make a punny out of my typo? That's tragic.

 

[fantome profane]

Dear FP, No, but unlike the False ToE, my view agrees with every discovery of Science and History, therefore, it's the Same Truth as that of Science, no matter how you look at it. The False ToE is nothing more than an incomplete, untrue, false assumption, of men who are afraid of their certain righteous Judgment. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Ah, but ya just said that science does no agree wit ya. Cus science is "willfully ignorant". So wat ya sayin now is your view agreess wit the "willfully ignorant". Tis dat it?