dallas1125
Covert Operative
Yes, but it is arguable as I said.Then wouldn't anything including guns, traps, feeders, enclosed fields, etc. also be fair?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, but it is arguable as I said.Then wouldn't anything including guns, traps, feeders, enclosed fields, etc. also be fair?
Right... so you can't say whether the population of humans is "too high".
Then wouldn't anything including guns, traps, feeders, enclosed fields, etc. also be fair?
Not in my book.So this is my first thread around here (I think.) Hope I do well!
I am a huge hunter but I do have my own set of morals I follow when I hunt.
1. I eat what I kill.
2. I give the game a fair chance.
3. I only use myself and dogs.
A. The only time I use vehicles is to transfer big game after I kill it.
Am I acting immorally when I hunt animals?
I think so.Isnt hunting more moral than eating cows that have been breed and massively slaughtered?
Sometimes. I despise trophy/ sport hunters who waste the kill.Is it wrong to hunt animals?
No.Is it wrong to eat them?
However, isn't it fair to say the population of humans is "too high" when 3/4's of it doesn't get the needed substance.
It seems more than fair to say that. Widespread undernourishment would be a symptom of overpopulation.However, isn't it fair to say the population of humans is "too high" when 3/4's of it doesn't get the needed substance.
Luckily the government puts limitations on this so we dont have to do it!there is just 1 question you need to ask,
can the population of game that im hunting sustain being hunted?
I wouldn't say that what you are doing is necessarily immoral. I couldn't possibly say that as long as I eat meat. I really can't understand, though, what enjoyment there is in taking a life. It's something that I've never been able to get my head around.I am a huge hunter but I do have my own set of morals I follow when I hunt.
1. I eat what I kill.
2. I give the game a fair chance.
3. I only use myself and dogs.
A. The only time I use vehicles is to transfer big game after I kill it.
Am I acting immorally when I hunt animals?
Luckily the government puts limitations on this so we dont have to do it!
I dont know what the enjoyment is. I have a lot of different ideas about it though.I wouldn't say that what you are doing is necessarily immoral. I couldn't possibly say that as long as I eat meat. I really can't understand, though, what enjoyment there is in taking a life. It's something that I've never been able to get my head around.
I believe that was not because of the limitations but because the government screwed up.those limits do not always suffice. the huntiing of wolves and polar bears is an example of that.
I believe that was not because of the limitations but because the government screwed up.
I meant that the limitations work, but the government screwed up the limitations. Plus it has a lot to do with relocation of the wolves (I think) today more than the limitations.they are both present day problems and aren't the limitations set by the government?
I just want to ask a simple question to the OP: Do you absolutely need to hunt for animals or can you cope by eating fruit, nuts and veg? If the latter is the case, then why the need to hunt an animal and cause another living being pain and distress?
those limits do not always suffice. the huntiing of wolves and polar bears is an example of that.
I'm not pale and sick! ( well, not sick anyway. There's not much I can do about my northern European ancestry).There was a documentary last night on SBS called "Did cooking make us human?" and it looked into humans living on a raw diet (fruit, nuts and veg - like you've suggested) and they discovered that, not only could the volunteers not get through the sheer volume of food they'd need to survive, but they actually lost an average of 6 kilos in the week and would have starved to death had they continued to eat that way. We need meat in our diets, and yes, you can survive on a vegetarian/vegan diet, but really, I haven't met one single veg who didn't look pale and sick.
As long as it's done humanely and using as much of the animal as possible, hunt away!
Why can't a human hunt for survival? I think that it is immoral to support corporate run slaughterhouses when you have the option to hunt. Any hunter has it in their best interest to invoke as little suffering to their prey as it results in better meat.That is always the argument that seems to come up. How can a wolf or a lion live otherwise? They are hunting for survival - humans aren't.
There was a documentary last night on SBS called "Did cooking make us human?" and it looked into humans living on a raw diet (fruit, nuts and veg - like you've suggested) and they discovered that, not only could the volunteers not get through the sheer volume of food they'd need to survive, but they actually lost an average of 6 kilos in the week and would have starved to death had they continued to eat that way.
but really, I haven't met one single veg who didn't look pale and sick.