I am a Believer, So Mock Away.

[willowjoy]

You said probably which could be a big mistake if your wrong, as probabilities go.:thud:

The deity portrayed in the Bible has a lot more for which to apologise to us humans than we have to it!:yes:

 

[Pegg]

Science has long (centuries) been seen as the Devil's tool to subvert religious dogma, yet religion
survives & likely always will. We cannot disprove the existence of gods. So it needn't be worried about.

science is not strong enough, or smart enough to outwit God. there will always be worshipers of God on earth because as you say, science cannot disprove Gods existence.

Science can only examine physical things within this universe...but God is not in this universe and is not physical so there will never be any scientific evidence against Gods existence.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

science is not strong enough, or smart enough to outwit God. there will always be worshipers of God on earth because as you say, science cannot disprove Gods existence.

Same for Russell's Teapot or Carl Sagan's Invisible Dragon in the Garage. This still doesn't get you to the point where belief in God is reasonable.

Science can only examine physical things within this universe...but God is not in this universe and is not physical so there will never be any scientific evidence against Gods existence.

That depends on what you mean by "God". If all you mean is an intelligent but non-physical thing that lives beyond the universe and never interacts with things inside the universe, then yes, there can never be any scientific evidence against this god's existence... but this god is irrelevant.

If you mean a god who works miracles, sent his revealed Word to humanity, sent his son to live amongst humans, and answers prayers, then there should be gobs and gobs of physical things around that can serve as evidence for or against such a god.

 

[atanu]

We emphatically reject "truth".

A revoltifarian scientist.

 

[Father Heathen]

Well since Dawkins has given a mandate to the new atheist to mock those of us who are believers, I Cindy hereby give you permission to mock my beliefs.

So go ahead and mock away.

Jesus walked into a hotel with three nails and asks " can you put me up for the night?"

Thankfully, many atheists consider Dawkins to be a less than desirable "spokesperson" for atheism.

Liturgical? More like lethargic..al.

Those that mock theists, that do try to mock my beliefs, only show what they don't know. Thanks to Hollywood and fiction writers, the average person really doesn't understand what it is I do believe and what they try to mock isn't what I believe anyway. I usually end up just rolling my eyes and shaking my head at the absurdity of it all.

Your god smells like pine.

Your faith does too... or can you predict the exact nature of the next species to evolve? Let's see your prediction, then we can independently & objectively see if your prediction is valid (O - be sure to state the exact date that your prediction will come true)

so, let's hear it, what will the next species be? what will they look like? and when do we get to meet them?

Joseph Smith was a coffee fiend.

What about... your faith is so ugly if it was a dog I would shave its butt and teach it to walk backwards.

Your gods are smurfy.

Alright, it's mocking time!

Hey guis im cynthiacypher and im a gnostic and im also a gurrrrrrl!
lolz fight the powerrrrrrrrr!!
use the power pastiessssssssssssssssss!
My belifs are pretty kewl becus of demiurges and... umm... liek, Jesus and stuff!! Archons! Uhh...
I follow a religion hardly anyone else does!!!!!! Uh...


Frig, I'm terrible at this. Can't really mock beliefs I sympathise with. But it was worth a shot and it was fun. Cool thread.

Sorry, dearest.

...

Spoiler: One last try?

Your religious belief system is so <negative quality> that when I/it/you <relatively ordinary every-day event>, I/it/you <totally abnormal and quite humorous event, as a result of aforementioned negative quality>.

Mutagen should be ret-conned into the crucifixion/resurrection story.

As I am the only poster here with an objective view of reality.

YOU'RE ALL WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING! THE ONLY TIME YOU'RE NOT WRONG IS WHEN YOU ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG AND EVEN THEN YOU'RE STILL STUPID!

Dark pagan? Off-white pagan at best.

Eh, who cares.


If it makes you feel better I get mocked for listioning to electro dance music, and don't dance

Any faith that disavows the consumption of delicious pig flesh is a feeble falsehood.

You infidel!

You dress your women like ninjas, yet their ninjutsu is woefully inadequate.

the spiritual warfare has taken an interesting turn with the introduction of using science as tool against belief.

Matthew 5:11 “Happy are YOU when people reproach YOU and persecute YOU and lyingly say every sort of wicked thing against YOU for my sake. 12 Rejoice and leap for joy, since YOUR reward is great in the heavens; for in that way they persecuted the prophets prior to YOU.

Ha, ha, no birthday cake for you.

 

[beerisit]

your god wears army boots

 

[blackout]

your god wears army boots

My God wears Stilettos. :flirt:



*wait. How is this supposed to work?*

 

[Vultar]

Your faith does too... or can you predict the exact nature of the next species to evolve? Let's see your prediction, then we can independently & objectively see if your prediction is valid (O - be sure to state the exact date that your prediction will come true)

so, let's hear it, what will the next species be? what will they look like? and when do we get to meet them?

Judging on the latest creatures evolution, I would say a "hairless rabbit" is not too far off in the future (probably soon enough to see in our lifetime). This is based on the recent evolution of the hairless guinea pig and the previous hairless cat species, also the recent evolution of the "lionhead rabbit". A hairless dog will probably be not too far off either...

Evolution often tends to run parallels of changes with different species (hence the "teddy bear" hamster and all the others species that evolved in that direction - again the "lionhead rabbit" would fall into that category).

You obviously have not researched this topic very well...

______________

If I wanted followers, I would have joined Twitter

 

[Vultar]

I am a Christian and a Gnostic.

The question then becomes. Do you believe all that is written (the bible) or just part of it...

BTW - I've been meaning to compliment you on your "Flesh Gordon" reference in your tag line... Funny movie...

_____________________

If I wanted followers, I would have joined Twitter

 

[JacobEzra.]

Any faith that disavows the consumption of delicious pig flesh is a feeble falsehood.

What?!

 

[Revoltingest]

science is not strong enough, or smart enough to outwit God. there will always be worshipers of God on earth because as you say, science cannot disprove Gods existence.
Science can only examine physical things within this universe...but God is not in this universe and is not physical so there will never be any scientific evidence against Gods existence.

No argument here.

 

[Revoltingest]

What?!

You heard the man....your faith is without the BLT sandwich!

 

[E. Nato Difficile]

Science can only examine physical things within this universe...but God is not in this universe and is not physical so there will never be any scientific evidence against Gods existence.

True, science is concerned with the empirical, while religion is concerned with the pretend.

-Nato

 

[sojourner]

science is not strong enough, or smart enough to outwit God. there will always be worshipers of God on earth because as you say, science cannot disprove Gods existence.

Science can only examine physical things within this universe...but God is not in this universe and is not physical so there will never be any scientific evidence against Gods existence.

I'm firmly convinced that God is in this universe, or we wouldn't be talking about God. I'm becoming more convinced that God is embodied in the cosmos.

 

[sojourner]

The ultimate Christian mockery:
Final Justice Jesus Dressup!

 

[sojourner]

Jesus walked into a hotel with three nails and asks " can you put me up for the night?"



Liturgical? More like lethargic..al.



Your god smells like pine.



Joseph Smith was a coffee fiend.



Your gods are smurfy.



Mutagen should be ret-conned into the crucifixion/resurrection story.



Dark pagan? Off-white pagan at best.



Any faith that disavows the consumption of delicious pig flesh is a feeble falsehood.



You dress your women like ninjas, yet their ninjutsu is woefully inadequate.



Ha, ha, no birthday cake for you.

Inspired. Just ... inspired.

 

[HerDotness]

You heard the man....your faith is without the BLT sandwich!

Not to mention cheeseburgers and shrimp cocktail.

 

[Revoltingest]

I'm firmly convinced that God is in this universe, or we wouldn't be talking about God.

Oooooooooo......!
If we talk about the FSM, that means He is in this universe too.

 

[sojourner]

Oooooooooo......!
If we talk about the FSM, that means He is in this universe too.

Correct. But he's tastier, and a greater cause of flatulence.
:super:

 

[blackout]

Gods are in this Universe
because We have conceived (of) them.