katiemygirl
CHRISTIAN
They're not!The same if true for you if you've picked the incorrect God to worship. What if the Hindus are right? Shouldn't you be praying to Shiva, just in case?
I've the one true God. There is no other.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They're not!The same if true for you if you've picked the incorrect God to worship. What if the Hindus are right? Shouldn't you be praying to Shiva, just in case?
They're not!
I've the one true God. There is no other.
I have considered, and I have rejected Hinduism along with its many false gods. Brahma is not the one true GOD.Your questions asked others to consider what if they are wrong in their thinking. But you're unwilling to do the same?
Just because something is written doesn't make it true.bear with me.....
and though you are terribly redundant....I will ask for that true statement
again
I have considered, and I have rejected Hinduism along with its many false gods. Brahma is not the one true GOD.
...
But Christians such as yourself refuse to worship other Gods they don't believe in just in case y'all are wrong. Right? I mean if the Muslims are right and you're not following Islam the consequences for you will be damnation to hell. But you simply don't believe, and couldn't believe even if you tried, in the Islamic version of God.Therefore you should be able to clearly see why others wouldn't...or more accurately...couldn't...worship your God just in case.
Almighty God will judge between us all
Is that your own invented definition of faith? It must be because I've never read it anywhere.
I use the Biblical definition of faith. If you really want to know what faith is, read Hebrews 11.
I'll only deny the bad ones.Regardless of how many evidences I post to you, you will deny them.
If anyone's mind is made up, it's yours: you're the one pre-judging the outcome here.I'd be wasting my time. You're mind is made up.
Great - then there should be plenty of material for you to use when you make your case.There are many internal as well as external evidences. There has been much written about the topic.
First off: it's not just about me. Regardless of how you feel about me personally, there are plenty of other people reading this thread. If you can show them that you're justified and I'm unreasonable, then you'll have reached people even if I'm not convinced.It seems you are here to disprove the validity of the Bible, and not truly seeking evidence that it is the Word of God.
It pays to follow the rules.have you considered the parable of the Wedding Feast?
that one ends rather harshly
Not yoursWhich God?
Nothing is to be disregarded. Believe the truth, the whole truth and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.ok....but...
do we now disregard all of scripture?
or do we continue to cherry pick?
I do like cherries
Whether you are willing to admit it or not, there is no way of knowing for sure. There is no way of knowing absolutely whether God exists at all. Stubbornness in this regard doesn't make a difference.They're not!
I've the one true God. There is no other.
Cherries are good, but some scriptures are not cherries. They are poison berries.ok....but...
do we now disregard all of scripture?
or do we continue to cherry pick?
I do like cherries
I agree with you. It seems absurd to contend that scripture must be accepted or rejected 100%.Someone please tell me why a person should think to reject all scripture just because some of it is wrong.
Nope. It doesn't ''have'' to be. However the arguments to the contrary aren't well thought out. Where is the explanations for all the mistakes , that are presented in that paradigm? They aren't there. It isn't legit.I agree with you. It seems absurd to contend that scripture must be accepted or rejected 100%.
But it is a contradictory mess. I think finding contradictions is the start of seeking what was really said.My Scripture, /besides the syncretism,, is the Tanach. The reason why all of it is valid, because once you start assuming 'mistakes', in Scripture, your liable to just end up with a contradictory mess. As evidenced by the contradictory arguments that are presented, when people do that.