Or, the better and more peaceable approach is to recognize the conflicts as different perspectives at different times by different people with different ideas of themselves, society, and God. To try to create some sort of "master story" to try to tie it all as one "harmonious way", is what does violence to history and the richness of human diversity, forcing a single, master narrative via a religious consensus or a single "prophet", for the purpose of mass-control.
I think looking at them more realistically honors the disparate and diverse parts, rather than violently smashing them into a created mythology to support a particular religious perspective which later adopts them for themselves, and protects the "proper" understanding of them via "councils' or committees, a "house of justice" for instance. The "master story" motif, or the "harmonious whole", is a myopic view that does not honor other perspectives. It says "we see the truth", and you have only a partial truth, lacking what our prophet has revealed. It is therefore, not truly universal.