Still remains the problem of the Biblical description and timing, and the objective geologic evidence and timing of known floods. The only possible evidence for a catastrophic flood event is the Sumerian records and description describes a catastrophic flood on the Tigris Ephraties River. Noothing here about an Arc, Noah or the Biblical account. You describe two floods, which is equally problematic as far as the actual evidence for flood events.
The flood of Noah's didn't cover the whole earth, only in the area where Noah was at.
Otherwise can someone explain exactly how the isles of the Gentiles survived ?
Now notice in Verse 5, If the Flood of Noah's were to cover the whole earth, as people believe it did, then where did the isles of the Gentiles come from?
In Genesis 10:1-5---"
1--"Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.
2--"The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
3--"And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.
4--"And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.
5--"By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations"
So where did the isles of the Gentiles come from?
The other question is, as Scientist discovered in the area of the North Pole,
Plants and animals buried under neath the ice, How did they get there?
As some try to say, the giant mammoth lived up there, but yet the giant mammoth is a vegetarian animal.
So why would a vegetarian animal such as the giant mammoth be doing there, where there is no living plants to eat.
All because scientist found the remains bones of the giant mammoth, then they say, the giant mammoth must haved lived up there,
Which I consider quite funny. How a vegetarian animal would be in area of snow and icebergs ?