Reflex
Active Member
In view of what has been said about the First Cause, isn't that question more than just a little absurd? I mean, the answer is right there in post #222. Just give it a little thought.Does it imply transcendence?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
In view of what has been said about the First Cause, isn't that question more than just a little absurd? I mean, the answer is right there in post #222. Just give it a little thought.Does it imply transcendence?
See post #222.A lot of atheists are also materialist therefore do not accept a First Cause, afterlife or any transcendant outlook on life
I am facepalming so hard right now...And atheism doesn't?
Because they have tenets, principles, beliefs, etc. built into them. Atheism is just the lack of a belief in a claim.So how are those worldviews and not atheism?
I suspect that he does not want to understand simply because it will mess with his own warped world view.I am facepalming so hard right now...
I have NEVER said that atheism doesn't, and that's not even close to the point I'm making. YOU said that there was no point in atheists debating something that THEY don't believe. I have explained (repeatedly, now) that theism and religion have a multitude of real-world consequences that make it perfectly reasonable for people who are skeptical of such beliefs to openly debate them.
How do you not get this? It's really not difficult to understand.
A worldview is made of all the ideas, attitudes, and points of view that make us up, either as a group or individually. For the group "atheist" it is characterized by a world absent of any acutal god or gods.Because they have tenets, principles, beliefs, etc. built into them. Atheism is just the lack of a belief in a claim.
But that's it. Nothing more. Atheists believe all kinds of different things apart from their atheism.A worldview is made of all the ideas, attitudes, and points of view that make us up, either as a group or individually. For the group "atheist" it is characterized by a world absent of any acutal god or gods.
Yes, that's it. That's all that's the atheist worldview. It's foolish to deny that.But that's it. Nothing more. Atheists believe all kinds of different things apart from their atheism.
A lot of atheists are also materialist therefore do not accept a First Cause, afterlife or any transcendant outlook on life
I have read A Universe From Nothing by Lawrence Krauss recently and what I get from Krauss' perspective is that we are biological robots living meaningless lives in a Universe that sprang from 'nothing'. I can easily understand why many people couldn't relate to that worldview.
But that's it. Nothing more. Atheists believe all kinds of different things apart from their atheism.
I get that, but don't you think it would behoove those arguing from an atheistic worldview to know what they are talking about? The “debate” is always about whether some god or other that is analogous to Santa or a flying spaghetti monster exists, or about faith verses reason -- as though they were somehow in conflict with each other. That approach is childish and absurd.I am facepalming so hard right now...
I have NEVER said that atheism doesn't, and that's not even close to the point I'm making. YOU said that there was no point in atheists debating something that THEY don't believe. I have explained (repeatedly, now) that theism and religion have a multitude of real-world consequences that make it perfectly reasonable for people who are skeptical of such beliefs to openly debate them.
How do you not get this? It's really not difficult to understand.
For sure, thank you!True. They also can believe in things without evidence. For instance, I believe that life exists outside this planet, too.
Ciao
- viole
So you're saying that "I don't believe in god(s)" is a worldview?Yes, that's it. That's all that's the atheist worldview. It's foolish to deny that.
How many times does it have to be explained that atheism isn't a worldview? Worldviews cannot be comprised of a single position on a single subject. It's incredibly ironic that you blanketly accuse atheists of not knowing what they are talking about after repeatedly demonstrating your own ignorance.I get that, but don't you think it would behoove those arguing from an atheistic worldview to know what they are talking about?
And the irony continues. The only time Santa was mentioned as being analageous to theism in our debate was when YOU made that direct comparison.The “debate” is always about whether some god or other that is analogous to Santa or a flying spaghetti monster exists,
Firstly, give a single example of any atheist claiming that faith and belief are "in conflict".or about faith verses belief -- as though they were somehow in conflict with each other. That approach is childish and absurd.
I'd love to, as soon as you show the capacity to stop engagin in childish nonsense. You can start by admitting that your earlier statements about atheists having no good reason to debate the subject of theism was ignorant nonsense.Interestingly, RedDragon started another thread by posting a very good video about the difference between Classical Theism and Theistic Personalism. Since it was not accompanied by any commentary, I don't know if the poster understood the video's content, but Classical Theism is consistent with what I said in post #222 (which was subsequently and absurdly ignored). Now, here is another video about faith and reason:
Why not keep things on an intelligent level instead of going on half-cocked with childish nonsense?
what I said in post #222
here is another video about faith and reason:
In that case, back at you. Only replace the word "atheism" with "theism."How many times does it have to be explained that atheism isn't a worldview? Worldviews cannot be comprised of a single position on a single subject. It's incredibly ironic that you blanketly accuse atheists of not knowing what they are talking about after repeatedly demonstrating your own ignorance.
Seriously? You've just took absurdity to a whole to a whole other level. I have more than a half dozen people on my ignore list for that kind of nonsense and tried to ignore another -- a staff member that I couldn't.And the irony continues. The only time Santa was mentioned as being analageous to theism in our debate was when YOU made that direct comparison.
Firstly, give a single example of any atheist claiming that faith and belief are "in conflict".
Still upset about the adult debating the child about Santa, eh? I've never read a book by atheists making their argument that doesn't take that approach.Secondly, you are in no position to accuse anyone of being childish considering some of the posts you have made in this thread.
Not gonna happen. I refer you again to post #222. Instead of debating God's existence, atheists should discuss the First Cause, which is undeniable even by the standards of rational atheism.I'd love to, as soon as you show the capacity to stop engagin in childish nonsense. You can start by admitting that your earlier statements about atheists having no good reason to debate the subject of theism was ignorant nonsense.
I was unaware you can put yourself on your ignore list....Seriously? You've just took absurdity to a whole to a whole other level. I have more than a half dozen people on my ignore list for that kind of nonsense and tried to ignore another -- a staff member that I couldn't.
atheists should discuss the First Cause
Instead of debating God's existence