Midnight Pete
Well-Known Member
So I support the torture of animals while I love them with all my heart..
Can you explain this statement? I am puzzled by it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So I support the torture of animals while I love them with all my heart..
It wasn't necessary. It was a completely gratuitous waste of life. Why the atheist social conscience is unmoved by this I do not know. Weird morality you got there.
It`s called consistency.
I value cats and their lives as equal to the vast majority of other animals lives.
I don`t think we`d even be having this discussion if Revolting had killed a garter snake.
I see little or no difference.
The fact that the vast majority of people upset over the death of a cat wouldn`t even blink over the death of a snake/lizard/toad speaks volumes about how they value animals.
Would you have called the death of a rodent in the same manner a "gratuitous waste of life"?
Unlikely.
Aw man. My post was supposed to be a parody of certain other issues often discussed on RF. Crap.Kittens are okay to kill because there are snakes and spiders that aren't as cute or cuddly? The Puppy Thrower might have had some similar BS in her own defence. This is a very poor justification of animal cruelty. Since when is being a hick a defence for it?
Pulling the wings off flies or the legs off spiders counts as animal cruelty, BTW. Snakes are also animals.
Animal cruelty is a sign of budding psychopathy. It signals the beginning of a very serious sickness.
In honesty, I love kittens. Even if there was an infestation of kittens I wouldn't kill kittens. I would hold them and play with them and let them bite my fingers with their tiny teeth.
I think I could kill a Black Widow Spider if I had to. If I found it in an area with small children, I think I'd have to. They're just too dangerous.
Weird morality. You. Got. There.
If you mean "weird" as in "not common" then yes..thankfully.
So tell me why do you value a strange cat over a spider?
Is there any objective reason to do so?
I prefer cats to spiders.
But if a spider isn't bothering me, I would not wantonly kill it.
So by this logic if I prefer spiders to cats it`s then ok for me to kill a cat as you would a spider?
Revolting didn`t "wantonly" kill kittens, the kittens in question were bothering him and affecting his income.
Irregardless of how he handled the situation (shelter,turned loose,smack with shovel) death was the probable outcome any way you look at it.
So by your rational for the killing of spiders, (considering all things being equal) the same rational exists for the killing of kittens.
Given this truth the only objection to the killing of kittens is based upon personal taste.
Personal taste doesn`t influence my morality and sadly that makes it "weird".
I myself find it very weird that personal taste does influence most peoples morality.
Having, of course, no reflection on the legitimacy of your post--
Also having no reflection on the content of my post.
Do you have a reply that is perhaps relevant?
I`d like to hear it.
So by your rational for the killing of spiders, (considering all things being equal) the same rational exists for the killing of kittens.
Revolting didn`t "wantonly" kill kittens, the kittens in question were bothering him and affecting his income.
Because you fear punishment and hope for reward?Why stop at kittens if you can rationalize anything?
Yes, because the animal shelter charging him to take the animals and then killing them is so much better than just doing the killing himself, right?This diseased individual could have just taken them to an animal shelter.
Because you fear punishment and hope for reward?
I mean, that is what you were driving at, right?