McBell
Unbound
Based on what?You're kidding yourself if you think that there was no pain.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Based on what?You're kidding yourself if you think that there was no pain.
Reality.Based on what?
Reality.
Reality.
There's a lame criterion....another way of saying, "It's obvious!".
I figure that the time between the shovel starting contact & the
shovel finishing its job is less than a hundredth of a second. I
know from experience with hot exhaust pipes that I don't feel
pain that fast. Now those are a very compelling reality!
But you're not a kitten.
I really can't help but think that there was a less cruel and more humane way of dealing with the kittens. They have animal shelters and pet shops that would gladly take them.
Things have been too quiet here lately, so it's time to ruffle some feathers....or raise some fur.
Hypothetically....suppose I once found a family of very young kittens living in a car (an open convertible) stored in my barn. Certainly, I wouldn't let my customer
have his car soiled by their living arrangements, so I presume I must remove them. They wouldn't survive in the wild, even with mom's help so I thought I should
do something. My solution (which is legal where I live): I'd take a large shovel & quickly euthanized (executed? murdered? killed?) each one. (And yes, for those
who want the gory details, their little intestines would squirted out & get me.) I wouldn't want to take them to the Humane Society, since they'd want money from
me just to do the same thing, but more expensively....& they'd whine for donations.
So....was this hypothetical solution:
1) Right
2) Wrong
3) Neither, but you'd do the same
4) Neither, but you'd do differently
Btw, I didn't enjoy it, but I don't feel bad about it either, since my plan was to minimize suffering.
Note: Edited for legal reasons.
Frubals for an excellent post.Animals are born. Animals die. Humans are born. Humans die.
Living on a farm, especially a working livestock one, exposes you to a) the above facts, and b) the understanding that sometimes the range of available choices are not what you want to choose from, but the choices must still be made. If the choices are either ignored or avoided, the situation will become worse, the available choices worse, and the end result is more suffering than if you had chosen one of the originally unpleasant choices.
The answer to that is in your own response: Violently. I think anybody would consider smashing animals with a shovel an act of cruelty. Euthenizing an animal is far more humane. There's a reason why we give lethal injection to people like serial killers and child murders, as opposed to putting them in a guillotine or a bullet to the head.Sudden & violent though the act was, where is the cruelty? Is a lethal does of some gov't
administered Kevorkianesque brew any different, other than social acceptability?
(Btw, no pet shop in this area would take'm. A glut on the market they are.)
I cannot say I favor killing kittens with a shovel :no:.Things have been too quiet here lately, so it's time to ruffle some feathers....or raise some fur.
Hypothetically....suppose I once found a family of very young kittens living in a car (an open convertible) stored in my barn. Certainly, I wouldn't let my customer
have his car soiled by their living arrangements, so I presume I must remove them. They wouldn't survive in the wild, even with mom's help so I thought I should
do something. My solution (which is legal where I live): I'd take a large shovel & quickly euthanized (executed? murdered? killed?) each one. (And yes, for those
who want the gory details, their little intestines would squirted out & get me.) I wouldn't want to take them to the Humane Society, since they'd want money from
me just to do the same thing, but more expensively....& they'd whine for donations.
So....was this hypothetical solution:
1) Right
2) Wrong
3) Neither, but you'd do the same
4) Neither, but you'd do differently
Btw, I didn't enjoy it, but I don't feel bad about it either, since my plan was to minimize suffering.
Note: Edited for legal reasons.
The answer to that is in your own response: Violently. I think anybody would consider smashing animals with a shovel an act of cruelty. Euthenizing an animal is far more humane. There's a reason why we give lethal injection to people like serial killers and child murders, as opposed to putting them in a guillotine or a bullet to the head.
You're welcome to go back in time to about 1997 & visit here to debunk my claim.I also can't really buy that NO pet shops in the area would take the kittens. Even here in L.A. where animals are running wild on city streets is common, there are pet shops that will still take them.
revoltingest said:They wouldn't survive in the wild, even with mom's help so I thought I should
do something.
Well first, it's not my standard, it's just one that I agree with. Secondly, you don't know if the kittens felt any pain or not, since you were not the one being smashed with a shovel. Thirdly, not all acts of cruelty involve grisly acts of violence, like watching someone drown and not helping them (drowning is another painless way to die, btw). As for the last part, like I said: Pet Shops or Animal Shelters.Revoltingist said:So by your standard, it isn't about pain, but rather how grisly the act appears, eh? (That would make surgery cruel, even with effective anesthetics.)
That's one way to see it, & no less right or wrong than mine. My goal is to minimize suffering, with reliability & convenience. I didn't have a syringe
& any drugs, but I did have a shovel & exceptional facility with it.
I wasn't aware that we still shot people as a form of execution in this country. I thought it was all lethal injection?Revoltingist said:Note though, that while Utah state executioners won't deliver a bullet to the head, they will shoot for the heart. I'd rather have a bullet to the head for
less likelihood of suffering. For me, compassion is more about how the subject feels, rather then a queasy observer.
So you went around to every pet shop in your area and checked? It doesn't sound like you even tried that method or any other alternative at all, and just made up your mind you were going to take care of them with a shovel right then and there.Revoltingist said:You're welcome to go back in time to about 1997 & visit here to debunk my claim.
I stand by what I recall about the event.
....drowning is another painless way to die....
I just found out that Utah recently banned it, although a few inmates are "grandfathered in" for it.I wasn't aware that we still shot people as a form of execution in this country. I thought it was all lethal injection?
Now, now...nitpicking the details is uninteresting. This is about larger issuesSo you went around to every pet shop in your area....
Well I guess waterboarding is a way of drowning. I was thinking more though of someone drowning in a pool or a lake which seems like it could be different. Supposedly it's very peaceful.Revoltingist said:That seems wrong. Water boarding is such horrible torture precisely because it feels like (is?) drowning.
I've heard interviews with people who had themselves subjected to it. If was far worse than they imagined.
Interesting.Revoltingist said:I just found out that Utah recently banned it, although a few inmates are "grandfathered in" for it.
It's not nitpicking or a minute detail, it's getting you to defend your claim that no pet shops in your area were taking any kittens since that was the excuse you gave for taking them out with shovel as the alternative; Let's not try and dance around the reason for doing so.Revoltingist said:Now, now...nitpicking the details is uninteresting. This is about larger issues
& values. Let's not wallow in trying to to win some argument about minutiae.
Well I guess waterboarding is a way of drowning. I was thinking more though of someone drowning in a pool or a lake which seems like it could be different. Supposedly it's very peaceful.
Interesting.
It's not nitpicking or a minute detail, it's getting you to defend your claim that no pet shops in your area were taking any kittens since that was the excuse you gave for taking them out with shovel as the alternative; Let's not try and dance around the reason for doing so.
Well I guess waterboarding is a way of drowning. I was thinking more though of someone drowning in a pool or a lake which seems like it could be different. Supposedly it's very peaceful.