• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I kill kittens.

Mister_T

Forum Relic
Premium Member
I don't defend my claims.
Well that's one way to win an argument.

Revoltingist said:
You're welcome to dislike my actions & reasons....but not to be boring & tedious about it.
I'm sorry, next time I'll be fun and spontaneous by buying into the poor excuses you have for doing something inhumane, callous and a number of other colorful phrases (that you wanted to debate?) and not question it. :sarcastic

Revoltingist said:
You know....if you want a Yoda avatar, then talk like him you must
Another reason for smashing kittens, I think you have. :yoda:
 

Mister_T

Forum Relic
Premium Member
Take it from someone who has nearly drowned twice, it isn't at all peaceful or painless. When you start inhaling water you reflexively try to cough, causing you to inhale more water. Your sinuses burn like wild fire as the water hits them and your lungs feel like they're being ripped apart from the inside. There's nothing peaceful about it. You're basically choking to death. Passing out from lack of oxygen is the most merciful part about it.

tl:dr - Drowning hurts like hell.
Well I'll take your word for it then, since you have the experience. Must be another one of those urban myths.
 

Engyo

Prince of Dorkness!
ASPCA in Houston requires $30 to drop off an animal. They say they do this specifically to discourage people from bringing animals in.
And that's because they get 10 or more for every one that ends up getting adopted. It's easy to get people to donate money for distressed animals, but not to donate money to euthanize said animals.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Well that's one way to win an argument.

I'm not arguing or debating anything.
I suggest that you try to discuss the subject, rather than try to win an imagined argument.

I'm sorry, next time I'll be fun and spontaneous by buying into the poor excuses....
English lesson time! An excuse is a false reason which masks the real reason. I stated the real reasons for what I hypothetically did.

Another reason for smashing kittens, I think you have. :yoda:
So now you're an expert on my mysterious ulterior motives....just like your expertise on the peacefulness of drowning, eh? (What a blunder!)
If suggest dishonesty on my part you must, then of hubris & dimfoolery I accuse you.
But let's let this nascent flame war fizzle out, so that the issues may be explored.
 
Last edited:

Madhuri

RF Goddess
Staff member
Premium Member
I would never kill the kittens. I would feel guilty and disgusted with myself for the rest of my life. The idea of killing an animal like that horrifies me just as much as the idea of killing a human like that. I'd be traumatised.
 

Mister_T

Forum Relic
Premium Member
Revoltingist said:
I'm not arguing or debating anything.
I suggest that you try to discuss the subject, rather than try to win an imagined argument.
Maybe you put this in the wrong place then, cause I could have sworn we're in the General Debates section, not General Discussion.

Revoltingist said:
English lesson time! An excuse is a false reason which masks the real reason. I stated the real reasons for what I hypothetically did.
And the definition accurately reflects your excuse for not taking those kittens to the pet shop, "hypothetically." :rolleyes:

Revoltingist said:
So now you're an expert on my mysterious ulterior motives....just like your expertise on the peacefulness of drowning, eh? (What a blunder!)
English lesson time! I stated the peacefulness of drowning was a supposed notion (hence the reason the word "supposed" was placed there) of that long time idea that's been floating around; I never stated that I had expertise on the subject. So much for your expertise on English Lessons, eh? (What a blunder!) :foot: :facepalm:

Revoltingist said:
If suggest dishonesty on my part you must, then of hubris & dimfoolery I accuse you.
But let's let this nascent flame war fizzle out, so that the issues may be explored.
Coping out of answering, you are. Strawman, this is.

You're right, I should talk like Yoda.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Maybe you put this in the wrong place then, cause I could have sworn we're in the General Debates section, not General Discussion.

Good call! Next time I'll pick a more appropriate category.

You're right, I should talk like Yoda.

That should be, "Right you are, talk like Yoda I should.".
I once had an identity as whom I posted everything in Yodish. Easy is was not!
 

Dezzie

Well-Known Member
I don't agree with those methods either. I'm not a huge fan of cats but Lord I would never kill them. Why not sell them? Get some extra cash.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Some questions occur to me:
1) When is it acceptable to kill kittens?
2) When is it acceptable to kill other animals?
3) What's the difference between kittens & cows, pigs, lambs, shrimp, lobsters & chickens?
4) Which ways of killing are acceptable & which aren't. Why?
5) If one makes the decision to kill, 5a) should suffering be avoided? 5b) Should violent or gory acts be avoided?
6) If we make our killing methods feel very inoffensive, will we become less aware of the deaths we cause?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I kill 17 year old cats with arthritis.

I sympathize. We had a cat (Bender) with cardiomyopathy. He got worse & worse, & eventually
lost the use of his hind legs. We had a vet put him down cuz he was suffering so.
 
Last edited:
Top