• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I see no value in atheism

McBell

Unbound
That mean you believe god exists....:)
false dichotomy.
You really should look it up and understand it before you come back to the thread.

i know you won't, you are to egotistic to even consider that you are flat out wrong.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
and you wonder why you are not taken seriously...

sad really.
But you have been thread bombing me.....so why do this if you do not take me seriously?

You are denying that atheists believe that God does not exist...as if by changing the words around changes the reality. So childish...

By saying that you do not believe in God does not change the fact that you are in belief mode...your mind could not be empty of the memory of rejecting God, as you would not then be an atheist....the continuance of that memory is a belief....all atheists believe in the rejection of God....
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
But you have been thread bombing me.....so why do this if you do not take me seriously?

You are denying that atheists believe that God does not exist...as if by changing the words around changes the reality. So childish...

By saying that you do not believe in God does not change the fact that you are in belief mode...your mind could not be empty of the memory of rejecting God, as you would not then be an atheist....the continuance of that memory is a belief....all atheists believe in the rejection of God....
'Believe in the rejection' huh? Again Ben , that is just bad grammer, not an argument.

Look at this sentence: I did not not go to the shop today.

It is a very bad way of writing: I went to the shop today.

As a more contextual example: I believe in no god.

Is just a bad way of writing: I do not believe in god.

Unfortunately, no degree of semantic word play actually changes a disbelief into a positive claim.
 

Unification

Well-Known Member
Mestemia says...."I do not believe god does not exist."

Is your mind that thick?...Look, just in your mind, erase the first 'not' in your sentence...it then reads..."I do believe god does not exist." That is spoken like a true atheist... To add the 'not' back, that means you believe god exists...haha silly...

Such is true, then getting even deeper, there is no such thing as a true atheist, it is the same delusion and imagination that an atheist opposes.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
'

Bunyip said:
'Believe in the rejection' huh? Again Ben , that is just bad grammer, not an argument.

Look at this sentence: I did not not go to the shop today.

It is a very bad way of writing: I went to the shop today.

As a more contextual example: I believe in no god.

Is just a bad way of writing: I do not believe in god.

Unfortunately, no degree of semantic word play actually changes a disbelief into a positive claim.
Ok Bunyip...here goes...

"I do not believe in god" ........has the same meaning as....."I believe in no god"

So here is a question for you.....do you believe in Atheism?....simple yes or no answer please?
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
No ot doesn't Ben.

No.
Yes ot does Bunyip....Using your profound understanding of English grammar, prove to me that it does not have the same meaning...

....and please no answer me this.....do you believe in theism? yes or no....
 

outhouse

Atheistically
it is a belief system rejecting theism....

No it is not. You just want to create your own definition, you can for your personal use. But the rest of the academic world moves on with the current understanding of implicit and explicit atheism as well as strong and weak atheism.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
No it is not. You just want to create your own definition, you can for your personal use. But the rest of the academic world moves on with the current understanding of implicit and explicit atheism as well as strong and weak atheism.
Ok...do you believe God does exist or does not exist? Simple yes or no is all that is required....

If you think the grammar or anything is not perfectly correct so far as English language is concerned...please feel free to call it out?
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Ok...do you believe God does exist or does not exist? Simple yes or no is all that is required....

I know no god exist. Its a difference from belief. 1 + 1 = 2 I don't believe the answer is 2 I know it is.

So your question is fallacious. It would be the same as asking if I believe in 2
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Provide sources for that one. Your opinion could be viewed as anything but academic.
I think he means that atheists attempting to create their own interpretation of the English language mean they are not honest.... It is one thing to believe God does not exist, that is honest, but to rearrange the words and make out it is not a belief, but an absence of belief is just plain dishonest and thus not true! I happen to agree 100% with him....
 

outhouse

Atheistically
It is one thing to believe God does not exist, that is honest, but to rearrange the words and make out it is not a belief, but an absence of belief is just plain dishonest and thus not true!

That's may be your opinion, but it is not academic.

You don't have to like the current definition or accept it. But your disapproval does not change the current status of the definition that absence of belief qualifies one to not be a theist.

What do you call someone who is not a theist?
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
'Believe in the rejection' huh? Again Ben , that is just bad grammer, not an argument.

Look at this sentence: I did not not go to the shop today.

It is a very bad way of writing: I went to the shop today.

As a more contextual example: I believe in no god.

Is just a bad way of writing: I do not believe in god.

Unfortunately, no degree of semantic word play actually changes a disbelief into a positive claim.
Actually, "I believe in no god" is grammatically correct. Consider for comparison the famous "I fear no evil."
 

outhouse

Atheistically
I think he means that atheists attempting to create their own interpretation of the English language mean they are not honest....

Supply credible sources.

What credibility do you possess here to call anyone dishonest?

Is it not a sign of desperation when in fact we have provided credible sources the current definition of implicit atheism does not require a conscious rejection of the concept of theism.
 
Top