Riot police clash with New Zealand anti-vax protesters...Is it, or do we need a better understanding of what rights are? In California mandates haven't been well enforced. But in New Zealand people tended to stick with it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Riot police clash with New Zealand anti-vax protesters...Is it, or do we need a better understanding of what rights are? In California mandates haven't been well enforced. But in New Zealand people tended to stick with it.
They live in the fantasy of the 'lone cowboy', out on the prairie with his horse and his 837 guns, doing whatever he pleases, beholding only to himself, and dispensing his morality as he sees fit. Its an idiot's fantasy, but it's a very popular one in the U.S. One that the gun manufacturers and giant pickup truck manufacturers, and the country music industry, and Hollywood movie-makers, and the republican party, and many others have been cashing in on for a long time. So many entities have been pandering to it that a lot of people think it's their "identity". They have no idea that it never existed, and it never could.Social contract theory is a complex concept. Self-interest, greed, fraud, theft, etc. are easier to understand because the self has a direct benefit. I see too many conservatives completely ignore that the infrastructure they need to live and survive was essentially a socialist approach, how the collective pools resources the whole population can benefit in broad ways. They take too much for granted.
It hasn't been perfect but the case rate and death toll of NZ speaks for itself.
That wasn't an option everywhere. I barely changed my lifestyle at all but I don't live in a city or a town.Small businesses like mine had a ton of assistance, loans, business tax extensions, extra unemployment options even when sole proprietors, etc etc. What's been closing businesses (including the one that I left at the beginning of the pandemic) is growing incentives to choose no work over accepting unlivable wages. Especially ones who weren't taking safety considerations seriously.
Also, I don’t know about you, but I never was 'locked away at home.' I hiked in the sun all pandemic. I just did so in a mask when trails were too narrow to socially distance.
They live in the fantasy of the 'lone cowboy', out on the prairie with his horse and his 837 guns, doing whatever he pleases, beholding only to himself, and dispensing his morality as he sees fit.
No prairie here but there's nothing wrong with having guns or a pick-up or choosing your occupation. We still have the freedom to do that. People who don't sound very jealous when they whine about it.They live in the fantasy of the 'lone cowboy', out on the prairie with his horse and his 837 guns, doing whatever he pleases,
It has nothing to do with "everyone" being selfish. It's a simple fact that some people are and they will do harm to others if they think they can get away with it. EVERYONE knows this. It's why we write laws and create police forces to make people comply with those laws. It's why we create government.You sound like a neo-liberal in voicing these concerns that everyone is basically selfish and acting on selfish impulses. The dog is a far greater threat to the child who still has cake than the child who's already ate a share of cake.
Liberals don't last long out there. They need their safe spaces.It kind of depends on population and real-estate dynamics. You can find a few youtubes about guys who live in cabins in alaska, that freeze dry meat on steel lines, and have to ward off occasional grizzlies. But in the psychosocial matrx, are they then acting in only the way that any individual, of any political persuasion, would under those circumstances?
You can't give heart disease to another, and unless you do something like blowing smoke in someone's face you aren't going to give them cancer either.
Who said I didn't take it seriously? It's over people get on with your lives. This whole thing has shown me that some people love the idea of an all controlling government... it's a mystery to me.Screw thy neighbors is not taking a highly contagious and deadly pandemic seriously. You're actions effect others, amd when too many people have your mentality the hospitals suffer which means everyone suffers.
In the U.S. we think stupidity and selfishness are our "right". The advertisers (and now the media they advertise on) have been telling us so for a century. But it's not. And our politicians are so corrupt and inept that they can't make that clear to the fools among us that don't get it.Is it, or do we need a better understanding of what rights are? In California mandates haven't been well enforced. But in New Zealand people tended to stick with it.
Liberals don't last long out there. They need their safe spaces.
It's not fiction. I know people who pretty much live it. They still buy some stuff at a store but can survive without it. I myself have the skills to make about anything I need to live but of course we all like our luxuries.Well, the bushcraft-based, independent wilderness living idea is a bit of a fiction. I don't think there is a whole of precedent in prehistory for that being how life was lived anyway. Except for what genuine hermits would do
If more than just a VERY few of these people existed, doing what they do would become illegal. Societies don't tolerate those anti-social outliers for long.It kind of depends on population and real-estate dynamics. You can find a few youtubes about guys who live in cabins in alaska, that freeze dry meat on steel lines, and have to ward off occasional grizzlies. But in the psychosocial matrx, are they then acting in only the way that any individual, of any political persuasion, would under those circumstances?
You don't seem to understand the opposition. We preferThey live in the fantasy of the 'lone cowboy', out on the prairie with his horse and his 837 guns, doing whatever he pleases, beholding only to himself, and dispensing his morality as he sees fit.
A brave admission.Its an idiot's fantasy....
It's not fiction. I know people who pretty much live it. They still buy some stuff at a store but can survive without it. I myself have the skills to make about anything I need to live but of course we all like our luxuries.
Not to mention we need each other to procreate. And when we do, our kinds need a society to live in. Being the "last Mohican" is really just 'suicide by selfishness'.It's not fiction. I know people who pretty much live it. They still buy some stuff at a store but can survive without it. I myself have the skills to make about anything I need to live but of course we all like our luxuries.
If more than just a VERY few of these people existed, doing what they do would become illegal. Societies don't tolerate those anti-social outliers for long.
But they all had skills most don't have now. We are so dependant on our technology most people don't even know how to start a fire correctly.I tend to think its advertised as something that 'early man' would have done. But I think it's fairly clear that preindustrial people generally lived in tribes of people, that worked together to do whatever
Don't get me wrong, I still like to watch bushcraft videos, and I kind of like the idea of doing it, but it does seem kind of risky and spooky, in a way that was probably historically unnecessary
IDK, being a semi hermit is not a bad life and I don't see how it hurts anyone else.Not to mention we need each other to procreate. And when we do, our kinds need a society to live in. Being the "last Mohican" is really just 'suicide by selfishness'.