Muffled
Jesus in me
thats my point...a belief based on the lack of empirical evidence.
you are giving license to this sort of thing...
"the holy spirit told me that the bible is just a practical joke and there is nothing you can say to change my mind because the holy spirit told me so, so there"
well then jesus was confused
john 15:15
I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his masters business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you.
:spit: so the kiss was necessary for jesus in the synoptic gospels and not necessary in john...? :areyoucra how many jesus' are we talking about...? how many times was he betrayed? :biglaugh:
pay attention...
it isn't about ommission it's about context...john is describing a jesus that contradicts a jesus in mark or luke or matthew...
jesus is distressed in those gospels jesus is not showing any signs of distress in john.
context context context....the context in the synoptic gospels are contradicting the context in john.
watch for what then? if you are going to argue this point then you are going to have to tell me what they were watching for?
well?
john 14:31...takes them out of the foot washing orgy or was it the last supper...i don't know...
31 but he comes so that the world may learn that I love the Father and do exactly what my Father has commanded me.
Come now; let us leave.
john 15, 16 and 17 jesus says this...
15:1 I am the true vine,
16:33 I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.
17:1 After Jesus said this, he looked toward heaven and prayed:
Father, the hour has come. Glorify your Son, that your Son may glorify you. 2 For you granted him authority over all people that he might give eternal life to all those you have given him. 3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
now compare this confident jesus with
mark 14:34 My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death, he said to them. Stay here and keep watch.
matthew 26:38 Then he said to them, My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death. Stay here and keep watch with me.
luke 22:39 Jesus went out as usual to the Mount of Olives, and his disciples followed him. 40 On reaching the place, he said to them, Pray that you will not fall into temptation. 41 He withdrew about a stones throw beyond them, knelt down and prayed, 42 Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done. 43 An angel from heaven appeared to him and strengthened him. 44 And being in anguish, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood falling to the ground.[c]
context context context...
so tell me how is one to sweat blood from anguish while also telling his disciples he is the vine, and he is glorified and to take heart? it doesn't make any sense.
did jesus ask them to ask if they should draw their swords?
When I turn on my light, I don't have any empirical evidence of a flow of electricity. I simply accept the teaching that the light comes on because of electricity. Granted an elctrician could get empirical evidence but that doesn't change anything for me. I still have to accpt it on faith. So the matter is this, that empirical evidence is available but not necessarily to those who don't have superior knowledge as an electrician does.
That does happen but even then the person has to give a reason why they believe it to be so. I would rule such a statement as not coming from the Holy Spirit because it isn't consistent with scripture.
You are in error when you say "the kiss was necessary." It is not necessary for John to report on the kiss because the other authors did report on it. There is one Jesus and He was betrayed by Judas once in the garden.
Feel free to point out a contradiction but you have not yet done so. You can say "context" until the cows come home but a word by itself doesn't mean much.
Do you know how to read? The word "for" is not in the text. If the text had said "keep vigil" which is what is meant, then you would understand but you have this bizarre belief that "watch" automatically means "watch for." Not only that but the context defintely means that Jesus wanted His disciples to pray with Him.
So. It is not a contradiction. Jesus is not having a problem with the events. He is quite confident of what will happen but that does not mean that contemplating going through them is pleasant. re the dentist analogy in case you have forgotten.
It is not a "while." people are not capable of saying two things at once. Jesus spoke those words before going to the garden. Those words are not in the context of the garden.
He shouldn't have to ask. They should know from the words of Jesus that He is their Lord and that means they need to ask.