• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I was just thinking

DustyFeet

पैर है| outlaw kosher care-bear | Tribe of Dan
The OT says to kill gays

maybe not here, but perhaps this part is not 100% accurate, especially taken out of context all on its own.

in this thread, i think we're allies. and i hope that i don't turn into your enemy because of my feelings / bias about the OT.

personally, i would love to see a thread discussing this problem, and actually **all** the ugly problems in the OT.
i imagine it would turn out to be a mighty long list :)
even if i'm not welcome participating in the thread, i would very much appreciate reading and learning about the perspective of others. for the simple fact, i gots to defend my position. and i'd like to know what are all the big complaints.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I believe not. We don't go to prisons and tell the prisoners that breaking and entering is really great. In other words we are not there to support their criminal beliefs. However we are visitors there and not prisoners who have also committed a crime. In the wedding scenario the concept of being there is an acceptance of a sinful relationship. I believe unless a persons conscience is really sensitive one may attend a celebration.

My point is the concept of being with a prisoner is supporting their criminal behavior; the concept of being with a gay person getting married is supporting their act of marriage.

Kinda see the connection?

How does these two make sense?

Edit: In short, marriage is a crime
 
Last edited:

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
How can she sin and not all the men who slept with her?
That's dishonest, and I'm sure you know it too. Where is it at all implied that the men who slept aren't also guilty of sin?

In fact the we can infer it with confidence considering that both Luke 16:18 and Mark 10:11-12 explicitly address men.
 
Last edited:
Top