What are you talking about? Some of your posts about this subject give the impression of being reflexive and intended to be "tit for tat" rather than being thought out sufficiently or based on evidence.
I can provide various sources for every single statement I have made about measurable facts, like death tolls. On the other hand, you're casually dismissing the immense civilian loss of life in Gaza without any solid basis whatsoever.
That is a great theological question that gets thrown out there. I have found that most people really use statements like that as a catch all.
Care to be more specific and support it with a full Biblical approach?
I asked you that question to contrast the offhand denial of the civilian death toll with the ideals taught by Jesus, whom I assume you try to follow as an example. You had already been confronted about the dismissal of the statistics in another thread, yet you repeated it here without providing any reliable backup for doing so. That would perhaps be less unacceptable if we were talking about a less consequential issue, not the deaths of over 11,000 people.
We have no real on-the-ground access to any specific numbers. We do have Hamas giving us information which can hardly be accepted as truth
I already addressed this in my previous reply to you. No independent organizations or observers have found notable errors in the statistics whether in this war or previous ones, and again, not even the IDF has denied the statistics despite standing to gain the most from doing so. If you have evidence that the Gazan death toll is mainly comprised of "militants," feel free to contact the IDF and help it score a major PR win.
What we do have is that the attack on Israel was 99.9% civilian… desired, purposeful and wicked as it was done on purpose with no military targets.
(Highlighting mine.)
Regarding the highlighted part, Israel itself disagrees with you about the percentage of military deaths in Hamas' attack:
The most recent death toll from the military had 318 service members killed during the attack itself (37 more have been killed since the IDF launched its ground offensive in Gaza), with police citing another 59 dead. Such figures include armed fighters who tackled the terrorists head-on, but also unarmed service members in non-combat roles who were killed inside their bases, sometimes in their beds.
Foreign Ministry official gives new number as Israel continues painstaking efforts to identify the victims of terrorists' brutal rampage
www.timesofisrael.com
Your statement is factually incorrect per the statistics from Israel—not from Hamas and not from any anti-Israel source, but from Israel itself. If you work out 318 out of 1,200 as a percentage, you get 26.5%, so the percentage of civilians killed in the attack was 73.5%.
Yes, the attack was atrocious and killed vastly more civilians than military personnel, but the above demonstrates that you've rushed to some unevidenced conclusions and unsupported claims.
At the least, almost all targets by Israel has been military targets with an exception of “wrong intel” that may have caused undesired consequences.
The vast majority of the 11,000 Palestinians killed have been civilians. See above. I will reiterate:
not even the IDF has denied this. There's a reason for that.
Experts can be found in any part of the spectrum. Experts who contradict other experts.
Yet not a single reputable expert or reliable organization has denied the civilian death toll in Gaza.
As I said, if you know something all of those journalists, organizations, and countries don't know, feel free to contact the IDF and tell them that they should start denying the Gazan civilian death toll too.