Rick O'Shez
Irishman bouncing off walls
I am using the word universe to indicate Everything, including all multiverses, and all intergalactic space
Fine. Your idea of "Absolute" is still meaningless.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am using the word universe to indicate Everything, including all multiverses, and all intergalactic space
So could you explain the relevance of this to what we were just discussing? Or are you hiding behind Zen again?
Fine. Your idea of "Absolute" is still meaningless.
Agreed, but that also depends on how you percieve the universe. To me "universe" means the totality of everything that exists including all other possibly existing universes. So depending on how one percieves it, the universe can be seen as a sort of absolute because there is no other, but that doesn't mean it is not interactive or interconnected.
define absolute
define absolute
I think the important thing is what we can actually observe, which is perpetual change and interaction at all scales.
No, your mind is just muddled up again as you are attached to discrimination.
Infinitite, unbounded, does whatever the hell it wants.
Whatever. I am waiting for you to explain clearly how that Zen poem is relevant to our current discussion. Or did you just post it to look cool?
you always do this because you have little intuitive understanding. I am not going to do your thinking for you. read it and try.
So is our universe infinite and unbounded? No idea. Does it even matter in terms of the current discussion?
It seems to be unlimited, but who really knows for sure? For it to be only "pure nothingness" however seems quite the limitation. I believe it to be interactive and therein resides the potential for it to be anything and everything since it can change into whatever it wants.
The Buddha...said, "Since there is no absolute self-nature thus every existence exhibits void-nature. Because it is void, there is no rising nor falling. Since there is no rising nor falling, thus everything was originally in complete calmness. Its self-nature is nirvana."
'no absolute' refers to no absolute self nature, and since there is no rising or falling, there is no interaction
The Buddha...said, "Since there is no absolute self-nature thus every existence exhibits void-nature. Because it is void, there is no rising nor falling. Since there is no rising nor falling, thus everything was originally in complete calmness. Its self-nature is nirvana."
'no absolute' refers to no absolute self nature, and since there is no rising or falling, there is no interaction
"Pure nothingness" is just more meaningless nonsense in my view. Infinite potential sounds more promising.
"Pure nothingness" is just more meaningless nonsense in my view. Infinite potential sounds more promising.
You are becoming unintelligible.
I don't see The Buddha as being the absolute authority on the universe either, so instead I must become my own "buddha".