PearlSeeker
Well-Known Member
James Bond has children?A distinction was made, between the Children of the Bond Woman and the Children of the Promise.
Bond girl - Wikipedia
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
James Bond has children?A distinction was made, between the Children of the Bond Woman and the Children of the Promise.
So God cannot convince people of something without violence? He drove the nails and I don't believe it.I believe God has to drive this home with some nails or people won't believe it.
There is no benefit if someone forgives/doesn't forgive me and does/doesn't punish me if I remain the same.1 John 2:2
For all of Man's sins, aren't we all then redeemed?
The payment made in full. Nothing else is being asked of us.
To say God asks anything else from us, isn't this denying the payment Jesus already made?
There is no benefit if someone forgives/doesn't forgive me and does/doesn't punish me if I remain the same.
And why would God after forgiving us need our confirmation of His forgiveness to make it real?
Interesting to know. However, literary criticism is an important and necessary discipline but scholars are not the judges of biblical truth or accuracy. Even in scholarship, the big red line remains faith.Indeed it is.
"do scholars agree that Jesus was crucified?"
The only two events subject to "almost universal assent" are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate. According to New Testament scholar James Dunn, nearly all modern scholars consider the baptism of Jesus and his crucifixion to be historically certain.
Historicity of Jesus - Wikipedia
Correct. My faith does not create truth/history. That is, however, not what I claim. I believe it is objectively true.One's believing does not make things a history.
and Jesus is the overwhelming proof.We believe these things because the proof is overwhelming.
hardly overwhelming to none though, me-understands, please. Right?Correct. My faith does not create truth/history. That is, however, not what I claim. I believe it is objectively true.
I am a Christian, you know. We believe these things because the proof is overwhelming.
It is a wrong concept of John, I gather.1 John 2:2
For all of Man's sins, aren't we all then redeemed?
The payment made in full. Nothing else is being asked of us.
To say God asks anything else from us, isn't this denying the payment Jesus already made?
Yes, and the Gospels are reliable documents informing us about Jesus's life, deeds and words whilst on earth. It documents his death and resurrection with great accuracy. How can we not believe?and Jesus is the overwhelming proof.
What is your point?It is a wrong concept of John, I gather.
I have checked 1 John 2:2 is neither written by Jesus nor authored by Jesus nor spoken by Jesus nor shown to Jesus for approval, as all the verses in the KJV Red Letter Bible* of Protestantism people and of Douay-Rheims** Red Letter Bible ( of the Catholicism people) have been colored in Red. The above quote of 1 John 2:2 is not colored in red in both of them , one may verify it if I am wrong, please. Right?
No such concept has been given by Jesus himself, I understand, please. Right?
If yes, then kindly quote from Jesus, please. Right?
Regards
__________________
*
New Testament
(Red Letter Edition)
King James Version
The New Testament
of our Lord and Saviour
Jesus Christ
Translated out of the original Greek, and with the former translations diligently compared and revised,
with all the words recorded therein as having been spoken by our Lord printed in Red.
Holy Bible King James Version (Red Letter Edition)
**THE HOLY BIBLE:
THE DOUAY-RHEIMS TRANSLATION
The first English Version
used by the Roman Catholic Church
since A.D. 1582.(* With the words of Jesus in red.)
The First Epistle of St. John
Yes, the Gospels are how we come to know about the life, words and deeds of Jesus, but I also believe in Jesus because of what my religion teaches about Him, which corroborates what the Gospels say about His power, born of Almighty God, and the station of Jesus as Savior and Healer of all of humanity.Yes, and the Gospels are reliable documents informing us about Jesus's life, deeds and words whilst on earth. It documents his death and resurrection with great accuracy. How can we not believe?
What do you mean?For all of Man's sins, aren't we all then redeemed?
The point is well elaborated in the post, perhaps one did not read it intently:What is your point?
So?"1 John 2:2 is neither written by Jesus nor authored by Jesus nor spoken by Jesus nor shown to Jesus for approval
Meaning what?"1 John 2:2 is neither written by Jesus nor authored by Jesus nor spoken by Jesus nor shown to Jesus for approval
I agree to ones reason that the Books/letters penned down after Jesus disappearance, must not be included in the Gospels. Is that one is saying please, if I have understood one correctly, please. Right?Meaning what?
It was penned years after His assertion.
You are this "one". Right?but one could not give any reasonable argument, as one have none, methinks. Right?
Have a happy day.
Regards
paarsurrey said: ↑
"1 John 2:2 is neither written by Jesus nor authored by Jesus nor spoken by Jesus nor shown to Jesus for approval
I agree to ones reason that the Books/letters penned down after Jesus disappearance, must not be included in the Gospels. Is that one is saying please, if I have understood one correctly, please. Right?
Regards
after Jesus disappearance