Hell is a big fat religious lie. Notice I gave you two verses that all cursed by Adam will be made alive in Christ and you rejected them.
No, everything you post is a big fat religious lie.
See, what you're doing is attempting to bypass centuries of historical debate and controversy, as if your view is right and all other views are wrong, just because, without actually getting into it. You have bypassed my offer to debate on my thread on the subject. You are simply wrong. The concept of hell was in fact a religious concept in ancient Judaism, even the Rabbis agree.
Were you there with the early christians. Yes all scholars and commentators are not the Spirit of Truth but that is where you find your truth human carnal scholars and commentators and reject the spirit of truth ..
Have you considered the possibility that maybe you should ask yourself the same thing?
Who are you to tell anyone which of these all scholars and commentators is of God.
Who are you to tell anyone they're not?
Its all based on your bias opinion.
But of course yours isn't.
No I did not attack God's Word; I interpeted it by the facts their are two sides of the issue. One side you reject and that is the ultimate salvation of all men. The other you condemn billions with.
No, you are the one rejecting that there are any sides to the issue other than your own. I have good reason for my views. You are basing your view on nonstop presumptions which you fail to uphold. I have upheld every one of my views. I have made entire threads about my views in which I've successfully defended almost all of them, and changed a few since I realized a few things such as certain meanings behind what Paul said.
But you, you don't want to accept the possibility of interpretations that go beyond your own, because you think you are guided by the "Spirit of Truth", and thus can't POSSIBLY accept the idea that there are good reasons behind what I say. In fact, you
WILL NOT EVEN ADDRESS WHAT I SAY IN THE FIRST PLACE.
I have thought about your view, and I know the bible doesn't say what you're saying. You are twisting it like crazy, and then asking for proofs to deny your twisted interpretation, then when I provide a way of viewing the context which is the plain text reading that disproves your view, you simply swat it away and tell me I'm wrong without even explaining how, and then you repeat the same verses which I have proved you aren't even using in the right context.
It's beneath me to even reply to you at this point.