Not nearly as much so as the biological findings that it attempts to deny.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If the Theory of Evolution is true what does it prove?
- Thread starter Biblestudent_007
- Start date
Not nearly as much so as the biological findings that it attempts to deny.
Biblestudent_007
Active Member
Based on the religious scripts teaching you/the reader the truth.
McBell
Unbound
That's it?
Biblestudent_007
Active Member
I can take a course in biology and improve my understanding of ToE, but in the end I think I'll stick to what scriptures say.
Copernicus
Industrial Strength Linguist
What makes you think that you are in a position to know what is true? There are plenty of religious documents that you can easily reject as false. On what basis?
Biblestudent_007
Active Member
By training yourself to learn the difference between truth and falsehood.
You may well do so, but only by denying what is actually found in observation, experimentation and research.
Sorry, but I can't touch that one without stooping to your own level.
Not happenin'
camanintx
Well-Known Member
Since quantum theory suggests that physical matter can come into existence without a creator, doesn't your scripture appear to conflict with current scientific knowledge?
gnostic
The Lost One
biblestudent_007 said:
Ignoring Evolution for a moment, your Bible doesn't even teach you anything about basic human anatomy. So how can you stick to the bible if it doesn't teach you the fundamentals of biology?
The bible can't teach you a lot of other things in science, like mathematics, physics, chemistry, geology or earth science, meteorology.
Even in astronomy it get it wrong. From what it say in Genesis 1, you have light and darkness, morning and night, without having Sun as the source of light, until DAY 4. It is not only unscientific, it is illogical.
However, as a (creation) myth or a book of theology, it is fine. The bible (as well as other scriptures) doesn't need to be a science book. As long as you can distinguish religion and science, as 2 separate knowledge, then you won't get any argument from me.
Jose Fly
Fisker of men
Ah, so you are the type of person who will reject an objective truth because it conflicts with your religious dogma.
Biblestudent_007
Active Member
Ok, I understand now go away.
Biblestudent_007
Active Member
As far as I'm aware the Vatican has a symposium on matters concerning religion and science.
Copernicus
Industrial Strength Linguist
Again, what makes you think that you are in a position to know the difference? From what I can see, you are no more qualified than anyone else to know the difference. Everyone who pursues a religious faith claims to know the truth. How do you know that you are any different from those who are merely self-deluded?
McBell
Unbound
:biglaugh:
I suspect that this is nothing more than some sort of code for "ratification".
Especially given the fact that you flat out stated you will ignore truth and facts in favor of your beliefs.
Gunfingers
Happiness Incarnate
So. BibleStudent_007. If I can sum up your point of view as I understand it. You deny evolution because you feel it conflicts with the bible. You believe the bible over observable evidence because you feel you have trained yourself to see "truth" in things, and have seen that the bible has a basis in truth through that skill. Am I following you so far?
Biblestudent_007
Active Member
PolyHedral
Superabacus Mystic
That will most definitely be wrong some portion of the time. The only correct way to find out if a given belief is true is to compare that belief against reality. All other methods will yield inaccuracies.
Copernicus
Industrial Strength Linguist
Then you really ought to read Dawkins' The Greatest Show on Earth. While it is true that he proselytizes atheism, he did keep it to a minimum in this book. His goal was simply to show why he and other scientists considered the ToE "factual", regardless of whether those scientists were religious or non-religious. He laid out the evidence in much greater detail than you will ever get in an online discussion group.