Marisa
Well-Known Member
Respect does not equate to obedience, which is what you are missing. I respect almost every human being on the planet, yet I am obedient to none of them.sorry i mean she touch their feet by her hand as respect
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Respect does not equate to obedience, which is what you are missing. I respect almost every human being on the planet, yet I am obedient to none of them.sorry i mean she touch their feet by her hand as respect
that's Western view , as that site tellsRespect does not equate to obedience, which is what you are missing. I respect almost every human being on the planet, yet I am obedient to none of them.
Oh, you meant flirting. Well that depends on how your spouse responds to it. A person could have valid cause for jealousy if their spouse behaves inappropriately. For example:
(male) Hey babe! You're looking sweet.
(your spouse) Get lost, jerk!
{No reason for jealousy.}
(male) Hey babe! You're looking sweet.
(your spouse) You're a fine looking stud. Let's get naked and get it on.
{Reason for jealousy.}
So, it depends.
Nope. But that doesn't mean I don't respect them, when I feel they have earned my respect.the curious question , would you touch the feet of your husband or his parents everytime as a kind of respect ?
Why notNope. But that doesn't mean I don't respect them, when I feel they have earned my respect.
I am talking about offending flirting .
let's suppose that EX of your wife, tells your wife , " you looking so sweet" , what would be your reaction ? afront of you .
let's suppose that EX of your wife , tells your wife : " we had very sweet memories ,my ex-baby " . afront of you .
Marisa MemberWhy not
i mean , that not your type of respect , or it's about extra respect (humilation), or looks like obedient ?
If your husband demand to touch their his feet for ONCE, as try ?
I did not tells Hinduism teaches worship cats , and i did not lie about hinduism teachs ok ?@Godobeyer - if my father tells me to go and feed the chickens and I say 'Sorry, I'm busy right now' then that doesn't mean I don't respect him, but it does mean I am not obeying him.
Likewise, if a boss at work who I don't like and who I don't have respect for tells me to clean the office floor, I'll do it. But just because I am obeying them doesn't mean I respect them.
I can disrespect someone and obey them, and I can respect someone but not obey them. Obedience and respect are different things.
EDIT: Also, please don't go round telling people what Hinduism teaches. I don't go round saying that Islam encourages worship of cats. Please don't misrepresent other beliefs. It's very disrespectful.
this maybe not necessary to poke .While of course we should wait for Marisa to answer, it's your use of terms like 'demand' which makes your ideas so objectionable.
Next time, if there is "next" , this is my answser too.Asked, and answered.
I did not tells Hinduism teaches worship cats , and i did not lie about hinduism teachs ok ?
sorry , you need correct me if i am wrong , because I feel it's HIGH degree of hypocrisy that it's used in this thread , when you critic a way of life (obedient wife) ,and you actualy believe in it (your beliefs called wife to obey her husband) , since you hinduism called the wife to considere her husband as God ?!!
please check this : #114
then where I disrespect Hinduism beliefs or Islam when i suppose innocent question , when i asked a Western woman , if she agree that her husband (had other religion) tradition or not , and why not ?
Its obviously that hinduism called wife to be obedient her husband and his elders .
this maybe not necessary to poke .
that's between me and Marisa , she demand me before to answser to her reply . and i did .
That's the thing that @Godobeyer seems to be missing. That when you make your romantic/sexual reactions someone else's responsibility, as in suggesting that someone's clothing can reasonably be considered harassment, then it removes the individual's personal responsibility for their own actions. They can say "I would not have harassed that woman had she been properly clothed" and not realize they are failing to take responsibility for their own actions and engaging in victim blaming.
I am little confused , lets back toCats thing was just a random thing. Wasn't saying you said it about Hinduism.
The disrespect is you telling a Hindu what Hinduism teaches when that Hindu actually disagrees with you.
The questioning was fine, no worries. It was saying:
When this is in fact an Indian cultural matter, not some intrinsic Hindu teaching (as if such athing exists).
.
This would be like me saying that female circumcision is taught by Islam because it is practiced in the name of Islam by so many people, when in fact it is cultural
I am little confused , lets back to
is not this site is a religous hinduism ?
http://www.hinduism.co.za/women.htm
and this scripture and many others , as culture teaching or religious teaching ?
"For a wife during her life-time, the husband is both god and lord alike"
the indians believe/accept in that scripture , as culture or as religious ?
final answser
did you reject to accept that scripture ?
you indeed right about
Why it's looks like sacred teaching , more than mythological moral stories .The lines between culture and religion in India are blurred to nothingness.
Yes, that site is about Hindu tradition. The Mahabharata isn't really a scripture, it's more mythological moral stories.
'The Indians' do all sorts of things.
I'll give a fuller explanation of my reasoning for not believing what some would say is a Hindu tradition when I get home.